As more and more truth comes to light ... @Freeloading Rusty watches on..Ah yeah, nothing like that first Covid fear porn fix of the day.
Just keep the fear porn flowing and I’ll be fine.
Rand has torn Fauci twelve new assholesThis article has been circulating in right wing social media this past week, but it's from October, 2021. Why are influencers trying to pretend this is a new revelation? Anything else going on?
View attachment 73750
That's a noble sentiment. Public figures should be held accountable for misleading people during this horrible time. But this is an ad campaign to drive up National Review subscriptions that has gone viral, which means it's a success. Holding someone accountable isn't hitting the retweet button. It's calling your congress member or leading a rally to demand the truth and then having a political outcome tied to the revelation of whatever that truth is. So Rand talked tough to him. So what? What did anyone do? What do you want them to do besides crush a person you've decided is bad? Fire him? Great. What do you want from his successor? Who should get the job? What percent of their time should be devoted to investigating orgins versus dealing with the ongoing health crisis? What can and should these agencies do better or differently? Should the US withdraw from gain of function just to be safe? If so, what would you like Fauci's successor to do to ensure that? Also, if Fauci lied, that means two Presidents from both parties also lied because it's highly unlikely the White House wouldn't have known if he knew. So what do we do about them? What might this lie suggest about how safe it is now? Maybe it's not safe at all and they're overplaying how safe it is like they underplayed their connection to the lab? Or maybe neither Fauci nor the two administrations knew concretely about this funding relationship and what does that say about how much we're minding public health? What safeguards can we put in place to solve that transparency problem? Maybe the US government should be forced to publicly list every individual and organization it has any funding relationship with whatsoever, even indirectly. I'd certainly welcome that.Rand has torn Fauci twelve new assholes
That can and should be revisited often so people can wake the F up to the fuckery/fraud/corruption
I hope to read that headline many more times
Twelve assholes
hahaThat's a noble sentiment. Public figures should be held accountable for misleading people during this horrible time. But this is an ad campaign to drive up National Review subscriptions that has gone viral, which means it's a success. Holding someone accountable isn't hitting the retweet button. It's calling your congress member or leading a rally to demand the truth and then having a political outcome tied to the revelation of whatever that truth is. So Rand talked tough to him. So what? What did anyone do? What do you want them to do besides crush a person you've decided is bad? Fire him? Great. What do you want from his successor? Who should get the job? What percent of their time should be devoted to investigating orgins versus dealing with the ongoing health crisis? What can and should these agencies do better or differently? Should the US withdraw from gain of function just to be safe? If so, what would you like Fauci's successor to do to ensure that? Also, if Fauci lied, that means two Presidents from both parties also lied because it's highly unlikely the White House wouldn't have known if he knew. So what do we do about them? What might this lie suggest about how safe it is now? Maybe it's not safe at all and they're overplaying how safe it is like they underplayed their connection to the lab? Or maybe neither Fauci nor the two administrations knew concretely about this funding relationship and what does that say about how much we're minding public health? What safeguards can we put in place to solve that transparency problem? Maybe the US government should be forced to publicly list every individual and organization it has any funding relationship with whatsoever, even indirectly. I'd certainly welcome that.
The point of my questions aren't necessarily for you to answer them one by one, but to move beyond the idea that folks are corrupt and lie and think about what we do about it. What is the thing we build to ensure public health is transparent, safe and accountable? What does it mean that government is using all these private contractors instead of having a system with public oversight and the accompanying transparency? It seems like our system, which is privatized from the R&D work to the everyday point of access for care, is full of places for people to hide things and act in ways outside the public interest. If we had a health system accountable to, owned by and for the benefit of everyday people, suits of all stripes wouldn't be able to lie to us whenever they wanted to.haha
I was gonna answer all your questions but then I saw there were 36 of them so I decided I couldn't read anymore
I don't care about subscriptions and I don't know who is spamming the article for gain...The testimony and incriminating documents and paper trail is the story for me, that is all I care about or will remember
The common theme to your 36 questions is corruption, it has no bounds or rules, you/I and everybody not tuned only into MSM knows it...the solution, I am unsure about...open to suggestions, but forgetting Fauci and his fraudulent sales pitch tactics over his looong corrupt career isn't a solution I will engage in, or endorse.
I understood and understand the point of multiple questions. I have had many of the exact questions myself.The point of my questions aren't necessarily for you to answer them one by one, but to move beyond the idea that folks are corrupt and lie and think about what we do about it. What is the thing we build to ensure public health is transparent, safe and accointable? What does it mean that government is using all these private contractors instead of having a system with public oversight and the accompanying transparency? It seems like our system, which is privatized from the R&D work to the everyday point of access for care, is full of places for people to hide things and act in ways outside the public interest. If we had a health system accountable to, owned by and for the benefit of everyday people, suits of all stripes wouldn't be able to lie to us whenever they wanted to.
Again this article is nearly a year old as are the disclosures it mentions. The exposure already happened. But information about the relative danger and long term risks of this virus is still being misrepresented to the general public. The short term issue is that needs to change right now. The longer term issue is that if it wasn't Fauci it would be someone else we never heard of before 2020 saying the exact same things. It's because health and health related research lacks sufficient public oversight, which it would have if it weren't a product for sale.I understood and understand the point of multiple questions. I have had many of the exact questions myself.
The fact somebody is using this story or video for clicks doesn't bug me, I don't care who/why/how it is getting posted...people need to know what was and is going on.
Of course we are both engaging in mental masturbation, the system is so powerful and so corrupt that it obviously has an immense chokehold on our minds and out health. Truth and honesty set sail decades ago and we can only hope to re-unite with them down the line.
TLDR...Fauci needs to be exposed regardless of the method/website/article...He is the talking head that was pushed the most and that many people believed at face value...Trust the Science.
I got confronted and all I had to do was explain the truth, that my friend and his whole double jabbed family was sick that week and I was protecting others from me.
All I am saying is...Again this article is nearly a year old as are the disclosures it mentions. The exposure already happened. But information about the relative safety and long term stability of this virus is still being misrepresented to the general public. The short term issue is that needs to change right now. The longer term issue is that if it wasn't Fauci it would be someone else we never heard of before 2020 saying the exact same things. It's because health and health related research lacks sufficient public oversight, which it would have if it weren't a product for sale.
but what are we doing to make sure he's held accountable, besides kicking advert money to right-wing websites?All I am saying is...
Fauci does not deserve to get a pass
I'm not going to ignore it, that is what I am doing.but what are we doing to make sure he's held accountable, besides kicking advert money to right-wing websites?
Lol who you foolin?I couldn’t wait to get off work today and get my fix of Covid vaccine fear porn.