Belgian priest arrested after deadly night of sex and drugs with British cleric
The 60-year-old priest was questioned by the investigating judge and placed under arrest, the prosecutor's office said.
www.cbsnews.com
General Belgian priest arrested after deadly night of gay sex and drugs with British priest
- Thread starter touch
- Start date
www.cbsnews.com
I'm surprised this doesn't happen more often.
I'm sure it does
I mean the picture of the pope and the reference to his visit, as well as the term "preist" all point to them being catholic. Plus catholics are a bunch of disgusting degenerates.
Why do you need a picture of a former pope when you can just use the term "catholic priest"? Doesn't that seem odd to you?
Have you met any "journalists"? They're retards, that article is par for the course.
This is true
These kind of articles pop up from time to time. If you Google Belgian priest in the news you see the article on several outlets written almost identically. Infact you have to look really close to notice they're not the exact same article reposted over and over.
None of them contain any information that is different. All of them are littered with links to articles about catholic church sex abuse. They follow the exact same format and none of them contain one peice of information different from the other.
There is no way that different people wrote almost the same article in the same format but they're just different enough so you know it's not the same article picked up by different outlets. None of them list an author of the story.
It almost like an ad rather than a news story. My guess is these outlets at best are using AI to rewrite the same thing just slightly different enough to not be plagiarism or at worst this never actually happened at all and it's wierd propaganda to pop up like a add for herbal pills when you search for headaches or cancer.
I'm getting where I can spot them now just by seeing them.
None of them contain any information that is different. All of them are littered with links to articles about catholic church sex abuse. They follow the exact same format and none of them contain one peice of information different from the other.
There is no way that different people wrote almost the same article in the same format but they're just different enough so you know it's not the same article picked up by different outlets. None of them list an author of the story.
It almost like an ad rather than a news story. My guess is these outlets at best are using AI to rewrite the same thing just slightly different enough to not be plagiarism or at worst this never actually happened at all and it's wierd propaganda to pop up like a add for herbal pills when you search for headaches or cancer.
I'm getting where I can spot them now just by seeing them.
Last edited:
Are you completely unaware of reuters and the associated press? Local agencies copy and paste shit from them, and each other, all the time. The catholic church is also extremely secretive and has been trying to cover shit up for years, so sparse details, initially, are to be expected. No one needs to make up stories about sex abuse and faggotry in the catholic church, it's commonplace and has been for centuries.
Are you catholic?
Pics?
Asking for a friend...
Asking for a friend...
If you read what I wrote, they are not copied and pasted.
It's happened in every established organization across time. Why are you so down on the church. Have you looked at studies of how wide spread it is? At least relative to say the American public school system?
No I'm not catholic but I have appreciated thier hospitals for many years and watched their charities give away a lot of winter coats and feed a lot of people.
I'm not a fan of any Abrahamic religions. They're all vile. Will you link some of your studies, friend, so I can check them out. Were those studies funded/conducted by catholics?
Great to see that clergy is leading by example
There are a ton of bots that scrape the internet for news stories, change just a few little bits of the headline and story, and then post them as their own. The more sophisticated ones apparently use automated AI scripts to rewrite the stories differently from the original article.
You can often tell them by the way they will use random foreign letters like ö instead of o, or ş instead of s etc. in the headlines, in order to avoid being immediate flagged as a copy.
They just harvest clicks in order to generate ad revenue, if one website gets shut down, or just becomes unpopular due to people cottoning on, they just switch up to the next one.
Some of them do have a bit of human input. They will have the bots automatically generate a ton of AI slop, and flag up those that are gaining clicks the fastest. The human operator will then edit those articles to remove any obvious AI weirdness so that it doesn't lose traction.
If you click on one that has only recently been scraped and posted, you will often see a lot of disjointed nonsense in the article, as the AI has misinterpreted the original story.
The Opera browser news feed on my phone used to be heavily infected with this crap, which is how I ended up going down the rabbit hole to find where it was all coming from. It seems to have calmed down a lot recently.
No
You didn't even take the time to check what I wrote, rather you made a condescending statement out of happy ignorance about rueters. Why would I go through the trouble of posting research. You'd be much happier with your meme assembled philosophy.
