A few things:Pit bull mix running around loose on the streets. As much as I hate overzealous cops, the only thing this irresponsible dog owner only deserves, is a Matt Serra gif
Not if it were in a cage and the law stated that the dog did not have to be killed.If it wasn't a law officer, but a citizen that shot the agressive dog, would that be ok?
No common sense.but he used common sense, saved the town money destroying it himself, and the town is now safer and better off because of him.
Im sure he shot the dog at that time because otherwise it would increase the chances for it to live and he wanted it dead, or maybe because it might be more work for him, who knows.Not if it were in a cage and the law stated that the dog did not have to be killed.
The entire story sounds like bullshit.
He states he was in a rush to another call, but had time to transport he caged dog to the shooting range before going to this emergency rollover.
No common sense.
Normal people would leave the ALREADY CAGED dog come back in a few hours to deal with it like normal.
They wouldn't say, "I hear there's a rollover" executing this already secured dog just became my top priority so I better get transporting him now and not heading to the wreck.
The saving money angle is just him fellating himself. He killed the dog cheaply because he didn't have time to find the cheapest vet. That's his writing in his report. Its ridiculous when you realize that that the dog was caged and then transported to be shot AFTER this supposed emergency came in.
Your argument is, "If the dog attacked someone while loose, it would have been okay to shoot it. So later on, even with the dog not aggressive and fully secured by law enforcement, I'm still okay with killing it without any process. Once a dog is out, just shoot it because no amount of re-securing the dog can undo the sin of getting out and shooting them trumps the man made laws."
I mean I really don't get it. It doesn't even compute to me.
Im sure he shot the dog at that time because otherwise it would increase the chances for it to live and he wanted it dead, or maybe because it might be more work for him, who knows.
And as ive kept saying, yeah, he broke he rules.... I just don't care.
If the police chief decided to break into the city's jail and shoot all the kiddy fiddlers dead, I'd be cool with that too. Ends justify the means type scenario. She should be happy with this because otherwise the law would be coming full force for her.
At the end of the day, the result is a police chief that broke the rules, and only a bunch of positives for the city.
They should keep an eye on this shady bitch to make sure she doesnt get any more pitties though.
Okay. Yeah that kinda changes everything. Haha. Ive predetermined it as an agressive dog.two 911 calls for trying to attack people.
Just saw your post here. That didn't happen.
One person called to say there was stray dog and it was barking at people.
The next call was a guy saying that he was going to go shoot the dog because school was going to let out, so he was going to make sure it was dead just in case.
The cop showed up and told that guy not to shoot the dog and doing so would be illegal. The dog was not a threat at that time and discharging the firearm under those circumstances was a crime.
I realize I've typed more than I meant.
@Hwoarang
Once a dog is out, I think we agree the owner should/could be held liable. In this case, the owner had the dog in their yard and it got out.
After that point, when would you be willing to let the dog live?
Did i just get wishy washy