Ok let's go with that. So you're using average skull size/shape with corresponding soft tissue features to separate races, right?You're ignoring the fact that the photo I posted is an aggregate of people. Not just solo comparisons.
Ok let's go with that. So you're using average skull size/shape with corresponding soft tissue features to separate races, right?You're ignoring the fact that the photo I posted is an aggregate of people. Not just solo comparisons.
I've been insanely blunt in this thread. Why do you want me to repeat myself?Ok let's go with that. So you're using average skull size/shape with corresponding soft tissue features to separate races, right?
Because we seem to be going around in circles and I feel this can easily be put to rest.I've been insanely blunt in this thread. Why do you want me to repeat myself?
i have a medium sized peepeeWhat distinct physical traits do members of a race share?
Yes.Because we seem to be going around in circles and I feel this can easily be put to rest.
So I take that as a yes?
OkYes.
Please continue.
The suspense is killing me....
That's an awfully unique sample pool if we're trying to be scientific about things.Ok
Drum roll.....
I present you two different races, based on the differences in the average skull size and shape:
Race 1
Race 2
Wood chick in the blue in the first pic.Ok
Drum roll.....
I present you two different races, based on the differences in the average skull size and shape:
Race 1
Race 2
No, actually I googled "Random Group Of People". Nothing unique about them. Any group of random people will have differences in average skull size and shape from another group of random people. Your agreed criteria for showing racial differences is arbitrary, demonstrating that race, by your definition at least, is not real.That's an awfully unique sample pool if we're trying to be scientific about things.
First pic, back row, second and third from the left dudes have strikingly similar faces.No, actually I googled "Random Group Of People". Nothing unique about them. Any group of random people will have differences in average skull size and shape, your agreed criteria for showing racial differences.
lol. We're talking about specific groups of people. Of course your search for "random group of people" will yield random results.No, actually I googled "Random Group Of People". Nothing unique about them. Any group of random people will have differences in average skull size and shape from another group of random people. Your agreed criteria for showing racial differences is arbitrary, demonstrating that race, by your definition at least, is not real.
South Africa FTW!Size/shape of skull and corresponding soft tissues.
Not that I'm in this but I get the impression "skull size" is a loose way of saying "relative skull size" or something to that effect.So these people with different sized skulls, must be from two different races, even though they are siblings.
Then specify them. I've been asking you repeatedly to do so.lol. We're talking about specific groups of people. Of course your search for "random group of people" will yield random results.
Relative to what?Not that I'm in this but I get the impression "skull size" is a loose way of saying "relative skull size" or something to that effect.
I don't know what their genealogy is but they're a different breed than me but I think we could still be really good friends, they have very kind looking eyes imo.
It's over man. Just stop.Then specify them. I've been asking you repeatedly to do so.
Yes, it seems that way. You CANNOT specify a race.It's over man. Just stop.
Populations?Relative skull size also varies massively within populations.
Exactly. Race is arbitrary. Whoever claims race is real can select the group of people they're categorising and that group will have varying proportional skull sizes (and other physical traits).Populations?
A population of a town? city? country? what?