Yes you did. You said "I know".
You keep contradicting yourself. You've invented this language issue and then fallen victim to it.
Race discussion with Big.Thirsty
- Thread starter Leigh
- Start date
You keep contradicting yourself. You've invented this language issue and then fallen victim to it.
Nobody answered the most important question either.
If not race, what will we call it?
If not race, what will we call it?
It is getting absurd, I agree. I give you credit though that of all the people disagreeing about race not being real, you're the only one in 29 pages to give a definitive statement.
The point of this thread (which you and I didnt start) was whether "race" in its current and most widely accepted definition exists and namely the 3 races Caucasian/white, Negro/Black, Mongoloid/Yellow.
It does not is what Im saying nothing more,do you agree mate?
Definitively correct, innit?
No, it was demonstrated false. But at least you stepped up, rather than make spurious pseudo claims and then refuse to have them questioned.
Call what? people grouped by genetic adaptions based on their environment?
"genetic adaptions based on their environment "
Just remember that the way those adaptions manifest themselves may be replicated elsewhere under very different environmental requirements
Therein lies your problem. Nobody ever scientifically qualified the word "race" as those particular subsets of people. The meaning eventually expanded to fit the broader perspective we have now, and over time continues to be less and less relevant.
The concept of race is becoming so irrelevant that the societal aspect of it has to be pondered for 29 pages on an MMA forum.
Dafarq did you come to that conclusion my brother?
Well, most of those 29 pages are me asking people for examples of their position and them tucking.
Mate. I keep asking questions to progress the narrative. If you wanna keep going, you're gonna have to directly refute. It is impossible for me to be anymore blunt than I have been.
If ever you want to talk about whether races exist or not Ill be here but agree that lets fucking drop it until you have a better point to make
1
1031
Guest
The words "I know" were in agreement with your condition of "unless." Now I may not have understood your point but I believe I was agreeing with your stated protest to the idea of race or whatever it is you have issue with.
I don't believe so...I mean, I agreed with you on a point but you seem to be under the impression that whatever you say, I think the opposite. It's hard to have a discussion with you when you invent positions and arguments on behalf of others.
I don't think that's true but I could be wrong. However, if I took issue with your words then it would be the use of the word "keep" (as an adverb) to insinuate repeated contradictions. That's an odd way of interpreting my posts, but there you go.
I honestly never thought I'd meet a man more stubborn than me...If ever you want to talk about whether races exist or not Ill be here but agree that lets fucking drop it until you have a better point to make
@Leigh and @Kirk have very sneaky logic.I'm gonna hang tight for
@Kneeblock's response though. He's challenged me to dig deepest.
NejYou win I lose.....
Sneaky = stick to their point and expose holes in yours that you didn't realise.
I'm gonna hang tight for
So thread cliff notes:
* Race isn't real.
*
@IschKabibble made a fair effort to debate (along with some shit posts)* The rest is filler.
The end.
Last edited:
I need to bounce huh?
Or not. But I made you admit race wasn't just a social construct. Why are you still here?
No you didnt thats why Im still here mate. What are you not getting here?
