The other day it was "industrialization" today its "macro" are these little thai midgets teaching you English or the other way around?
Race discussion with Big.Thirsty
- Thread starter Leigh
- Start date
I'm learning from them. Tomorrow I'll get their take on me lanes I and Indians.
Dont try trolling me man, I got nothing better to do than to keep replying to you.How many more times do you want to prove my point for me?
For some odd reason I dont doubt that third world slum dwellers are teaching you English.
Cant put my finger on it doh
It's not a good look friend. You got teabagged like 10 pages back and didn't even realize it.
Lol my students come from rich stock.
Really? page 22?It's not a good look friend. You got teabagged like 10 pages back and didn't even realize it.
Oh he realized.It's not a good look friend. You got teabagged like 10 pages back and didn't even realize it.
Why else you think he keeps coming back for more?
lol
"Hiso" in the first world equates to "I can afford to feed my kids"
Anyway either start getting racial on this thread or GTFO
I thought it'd been racial all along. You're flailing in various threads trying to bait people into attacking your supposed race which is kangaroo mix breed.
Zilch, except water
,
Let me leave you gentlemen with one thought.
@Alco Hauler tagging you cause I know your next in line to stir the oats
@Alco Hauler tagging you cause I know your next in line to stir the oats
P
Punch
Guest
I have seen not a single shred of proof race exists beyond the minds of those that wish to be divisive in this thread.
Yep we have explained it in various ways, I even addressed the "genetics" basis for race or lack thereof and then got accused of trying to play with words.
P
Punch
Guest
Your avatar and sn is fucked.
I know, yall didnt know Galt owns the OG eh?Your avatar and sn is fucked.
That's because you're using selective reasoning.
P
Punch
Guest
Actually, it's because no proof has been offered.
None of the proof I offered was refuted. Only worked around with a social argument, which becomes selective reasoning. The historical context of race doesn't apply when you're arguing very specifically about the biological aspect it.Actually, it's because no proof has been offered.
The implications that my point of view are racist are so beautifully ironic to me. I really hope I'm not in the minority in seeing this.
P
Punch
Guest
Your skull and soft tissue argument was pwnt.