TMA's 1-Step Sparring, Part 2.
To preface, this is not to say sport fighting methods like boxing, etc, don't work or aren't effective. Good boxers absolutely kill tons of sport karate competitors. I've witnessed this in my own dojo. The boxers prevail because karate isn't a sport. Sport training is physically centered, traditional karate is mind-body centered (and more). A very complex subject.
Where 1-Step Sparring is failure, is when it is approached as a physical drill. Then the criticism quoted in Part 1 will be be valid, and your 1-step practice will result in martial disaster. Stick with boxing, Muay Thai, BJJ, MMA, etc, coaches if you want the physically-centered approach. This approach will help you develop good technical habits. Just as the 1-step critic seeks.
Traditional karate 1-steps don't rely on habits. Traditional karate as an art seeks to develop a strong, disciplined mind which controls and directs the physical body at all times. Now 1-steps go from mindless practice routines of 'some' pre-arranged move, to a much higher plane of training where the thinking mind is making a whole host & series of sequential decisions in directing the physical, martial form of the technique. OOOWWWW. So what does all this gibberish mean?
The opponent stepping forward and punching with an outstretched arm, is simulating a physical attack on you, here by a straight punch. The straight punch is not the objective of the defense. The objective of the straight punch, the arm held extended, is to provide an actual, live example of what an assailant can do... IN TERMS OF A POTENTIALLY HARMFUL TARGET. The outstretched arm presents a model for how to efficiently & effectively deal, by competent thinking, ways of dealing with the assault. How the structure of the opponent coming at you in this way is never explained by the critics.
1. The opponent starts from outside striking range because this is what typically happens.
2. The opponent uses a punch because this is a typical attack uses by everyone in a conflict. And you have to start somewhere.
3. The opponent stops short of striking you because we are learning & demonstrating tactical principles first. That's right, 1-steps are instructing one on martial principles, notably applied tactics for the kihon (basics) in the curriculum.
4. More importantly, the opponent stops short so you don't have to worry about getting hit, so you can concentrate on developing the disciplined thinking needed to not fight like Johny Hendricks. You are thinking about exactly what to do in order to overcome the punch coming at you, and getting your whole physique to respond (not react) in a coordinated, tactically effective fashion.
5. The 1-steps present a menu or toolbox of tactics; however, the real value is learning how to think under the presence of an attack of what PRINCIPLES one has at their disposal. Mental discipline first, whole body second, precise technique third.
Of course this take tons more effort than Mike Winkeljohn moving striking mitts around for Holly Holm. WHY, because the traditional karate emphasis is one you, the practitioner, to develop a strong, thinking mind capable of causing the entire body to move against the opponent in the correct, efficient & effective way-- ON YOUR OWN. The whole body & mind acting as a disciplined, purposeful unit.
For instance, the structure of 1-steps begins with you shifting mindset from relaxation to a mentally ready state of being prepared to do what needs done, NEXT. Hence, it's driven by an internal process of the body and mind working together in unison, rather than an athletic punching-the-bag exercise or playfully trading informal technique with a sparring partner.
When the opponent steps in, you don't react, you RESPOND with the proper martial technique, IN PRINCIPLE.
If you practice 1-Steps as some automatic, per-programmed physical reaction to an opponent coming at you, the 1-Step critic is accurately correct in his interpretation of how useless and counterproductive these are. If you mentally glean the principles presented in the 1-steps and make the right, mentally disciplined adjustment to your opponent's aggression, putting your whole body into the move as called for, and select the proper technique or technical package, then you have achieved the traditional karate kumite skill, in application, to start winning fights.
A tall order. That's why the critics pan traditional karate and 1-steps. It takes just too much (way too much for most) mental discipline to master.
You can see some good examples of this watching JKA Shotokan kumite matches. The competitive karate skills can be attained by developing one's athletic abilities alone. Or, they can be developed through mental discipline engaging the whole body into the precisely needed response that overwhelms the opponent's actions. Wonderboy is a mix. Make a decision about traditional karate, but you can't dismiss it with popularized & superficial criticisms any high school athlete can discern. Or McDojo rat.
So how long have I been training? A "long" time.
To preface, this is not to say sport fighting methods like boxing, etc, don't work or aren't effective. Good boxers absolutely kill tons of sport karate competitors. I've witnessed this in my own dojo. The boxers prevail because karate isn't a sport. Sport training is physically centered, traditional karate is mind-body centered (and more). A very complex subject.
Where 1-Step Sparring is failure, is when it is approached as a physical drill. Then the criticism quoted in Part 1 will be be valid, and your 1-step practice will result in martial disaster. Stick with boxing, Muay Thai, BJJ, MMA, etc, coaches if you want the physically-centered approach. This approach will help you develop good technical habits. Just as the 1-step critic seeks.
Traditional karate 1-steps don't rely on habits. Traditional karate as an art seeks to develop a strong, disciplined mind which controls and directs the physical body at all times. Now 1-steps go from mindless practice routines of 'some' pre-arranged move, to a much higher plane of training where the thinking mind is making a whole host & series of sequential decisions in directing the physical, martial form of the technique. OOOWWWW. So what does all this gibberish mean?
The opponent stepping forward and punching with an outstretched arm, is simulating a physical attack on you, here by a straight punch. The straight punch is not the objective of the defense. The objective of the straight punch, the arm held extended, is to provide an actual, live example of what an assailant can do... IN TERMS OF A POTENTIALLY HARMFUL TARGET. The outstretched arm presents a model for how to efficiently & effectively deal, by competent thinking, ways of dealing with the assault. How the structure of the opponent coming at you in this way is never explained by the critics.
1. The opponent starts from outside striking range because this is what typically happens.
2. The opponent uses a punch because this is a typical attack uses by everyone in a conflict. And you have to start somewhere.
3. The opponent stops short of striking you because we are learning & demonstrating tactical principles first. That's right, 1-steps are instructing one on martial principles, notably applied tactics for the kihon (basics) in the curriculum.
4. More importantly, the opponent stops short so you don't have to worry about getting hit, so you can concentrate on developing the disciplined thinking needed to not fight like Johny Hendricks. You are thinking about exactly what to do in order to overcome the punch coming at you, and getting your whole physique to respond (not react) in a coordinated, tactically effective fashion.
5. The 1-steps present a menu or toolbox of tactics; however, the real value is learning how to think under the presence of an attack of what PRINCIPLES one has at their disposal. Mental discipline first, whole body second, precise technique third.
Of course this take tons more effort than Mike Winkeljohn moving striking mitts around for Holly Holm. WHY, because the traditional karate emphasis is one you, the practitioner, to develop a strong, thinking mind capable of causing the entire body to move against the opponent in the correct, efficient & effective way-- ON YOUR OWN. The whole body & mind acting as a disciplined, purposeful unit.
For instance, the structure of 1-steps begins with you shifting mindset from relaxation to a mentally ready state of being prepared to do what needs done, NEXT. Hence, it's driven by an internal process of the body and mind working together in unison, rather than an athletic punching-the-bag exercise or playfully trading informal technique with a sparring partner.
When the opponent steps in, you don't react, you RESPOND with the proper martial technique, IN PRINCIPLE.
If you practice 1-Steps as some automatic, per-programmed physical reaction to an opponent coming at you, the 1-Step critic is accurately correct in his interpretation of how useless and counterproductive these are. If you mentally glean the principles presented in the 1-steps and make the right, mentally disciplined adjustment to your opponent's aggression, putting your whole body into the move as called for, and select the proper technique or technical package, then you have achieved the traditional karate kumite skill, in application, to start winning fights.
A tall order. That's why the critics pan traditional karate and 1-steps. It takes just too much (way too much for most) mental discipline to master.
You can see some good examples of this watching JKA Shotokan kumite matches. The competitive karate skills can be attained by developing one's athletic abilities alone. Or, they can be developed through mental discipline engaging the whole body into the precisely needed response that overwhelms the opponent's actions. Wonderboy is a mix. Make a decision about traditional karate, but you can't dismiss it with popularized & superficial criticisms any high school athlete can discern. Or McDojo rat.
So how long have I been training? A "long" time.
Last edited: