D
Deleted member 1
Guest
FIRST OFF, you're not allowed in here if you don't vote!
NY Times ran this article...
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/29/s...-are-high-boxings-future-is-murkier.html?_r=0
Expectations for Mayweather-Pacquiao Are High; Boxing’s Future Is Murkier
Too dangerous? Is boxing just for poor minorities and that's why its shifting to popularity in immigrant populations over middle class America? Will this violence be the decline of MMA without the entertainment mixed in?
So outside of the existential crisis that boxing is undergoing, lets talk the fight itself:
De la hoya is taking Mayweather
Tyson picks pacman
Ali is picking pacman in the midst of telling Mayweather to remember that Ali is the best
Get your vote. How's the fight going? Is this the last hurrah without a significant change in boxing?
I want to argue against it, but no one knew a Klitschko was fighting last weekend. And GGG is in a tough weight class to really get a legacy going. He clears it out and then what?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c8e6/9c8e6009caf31a7890417e143014295faa828b64" alt=""
NY Times ran this article...
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/29/s...-are-high-boxings-future-is-murkier.html?_r=0
Expectations for Mayweather-Pacquiao Are High; Boxing’s Future Is Murkier
Bob Arum, Pacquiao’s promoter as well as Ali’s, had a front-row seat through some of boxing’s glory days and through its declining ones. He looks at his roster of 70 boxers, who are predominantly Hispanic and African-American, along with a smattering of Eastern European fighters, and he recognizes the sport’s fundamental problem: It is too brutal for all but a few.
“Boxing is for poor people who don’t have any other alternative to make their way in life,” Arum said. “We can’t get white middle-class kids into boxing. Let’s be honest: No parent in their right mind is going to let them come to a gym. I wouldn’t let my kid go into boxing.”
Too dangerous? Is boxing just for poor minorities and that's why its shifting to popularity in immigrant populations over middle class America? Will this violence be the decline of MMA without the entertainment mixed in?
I JUST posted the other day about the ratings for cable boxing and that it was doing as well as cable UFC. There is some interest still! Maybe not the heyday, but still plenty compared to MMA. Is this just the decline of the PPV model and no one is willing to say it?The bout also comes at a time of stiffer competition within the niche of combat sports. Both scripted wrestling and mixed martial arts put on lucrative pay-per-view events. In addition, World Wrestling Entertainment, a staple of cable television, has its own online TV network with 1.3 million subscribers, and it drew more than 70,000 people in March to Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara, Calif., for WrestleMania 31, the latest edition of its marquee event. The Ultimate Fighting Championship has a $100-million-a-year network television deal with Fox.
“They’ve done a better job building excitement and personalities,” Dorfman said. “You don’t see any Alis or Fraziers or Mayweathers coming up out there.”
Pretty good numbers.The most recent Saturday night P.B.C. on NBC telecast, on April 11, averaged 2.9 million viewers. That made it the second-most-watched professional boxing broadcast since “Oscar De La Hoya’s Fight Night,” a Fox broadcast on March 23, 1998, that drew 5.9 million viewers. Still, the audience figure was down from NBC’s first P.B.C. event, in March, which drew 3.4 million.
So outside of the existential crisis that boxing is undergoing, lets talk the fight itself:
De la hoya is taking Mayweather
Tyson picks pacman
Ali is picking pacman in the midst of telling Mayweather to remember that Ali is the best
Get your vote. How's the fight going? Is this the last hurrah without a significant change in boxing?
I want to argue against it, but no one knew a Klitschko was fighting last weekend. And GGG is in a tough weight class to really get a legacy going. He clears it out and then what?
Last edited by a moderator: