It is nice to know the price tag on the services that she provides.
Lol.
It is nice to know the price tag on the services that she provides.
Lol.
They are talking about his taxes and know how much he paid, when he will release them and why, that is pretty much amazing inside info, no? Also talking about 'we' while making the leaks at certain times to specifically stop the democrats from getting a presidency. That seems at the very least highly biased, and at most directly out of his camp.
@webtv.net?
Editor of the hill and Huffington Post coordinating stories with Clinton campaign.
They use the word 'we' a lot tho.That's 4chan who is has a large pro and anti Trump contingent. That's the pro Trump wing talking. And even the anti Trump wing hates Hillary.
Wikileaks just hates Hillary. Maybe because she suggested assange should be assassinated?
Either way, like media shouldn't be biased, wikileaks shouldn't either.
Yeah, the corrupt media isn't.... Oh wait, they are talking about the email leaks... Nevermind.And yet she'll get elected because the corrupt media isn't talking about it, and the American public is too stupid/lazy to research it on their own.
Lots of low-energy emails clogging this thread these days @Splinty!
for the record, IIRC, Assange is no fan of Trump. both terrible candidates.So wikileaks is working for the Trump-campaign now? They should have hitched their wagon behind a better candidate..
Or no-one at all, for that matter. Get this shit out before Hillary even becomes candidate.
If they got a smoking gun on Hillary, fire it when you can. Its not your job to fool around.I'll get right on that decades of government corruption and death from Trump...
I think both sides have a grand finale planned for the opposition that will be released a couple days before the next debate.for the record, IIRC, Assange is no fan of Trump. both terrible candidates.
IMHO, this has become more about him now. he is probably shooting for Snowden-type adoration. If he is really sitting on something that will "put Hillary in prison" or "end her campaign" he should release it immediately. I doubt there is anything more shocking than what we have already seen, & honestly, was anyone really shocked by any of his releases yet?
Its not your job to fool around.
I'm talking about the Clinton News Network and other television media entities that virtually ignore it. Who is reading the NYT anymore?Yeah, the corrupt media isn't.... Oh wait, they are talking about the email leaks... Nevermind.
Maybe you should have researched it on your own so I didn't have to debunk your nonsense.
NY Times article -
www.google.com/amp/mobile.nytimes.com/2016/10/13/us/politics/wikileaks-hillary-clinton-emails.amp.html
I disagree. The trickle release is brilliant. The news cycle in America moves far too quickly for a single dump to be effective.If he is really sitting on something that will "put Hillary in prison" or "end her campaign" he should release it immediately.
while Trump continues to sink? I guess it really doesn't matter @ this point for me.I disagree. The trickle release is brilliant. The news cycle in America moves far too quickly for a single dump to be effective.
Trickle it slowly, and save the juiciest stuff for last!
two worst candidates I could possibly imagine.
not a fan, maybe should have said 3, but Johnson not on Clinton or Trump's level IMO & no realistic chance of winning.I don't like Hillary or Gary either. Poor Johnson.