General Woolly mammoth on verge of resurrection, scientists reveal

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up

jason73

Yuri Bezmenov was right
First 100
Jan 15, 2015
73,000
134,473



Thursday 16 February 2017 15.00 GMTLast modified on Thursday 16 February 201722.00 GMT

The woolly mammoth vanished from the Earth 4,000 years ago, but now scientists say they are on the brink of resurrecting the ancient beast in a revised form, through an ambitious feat of genetic engineering.

Speaking ahead of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) annual meeting in Boston this week, the scientist leading the “de-extinction” effort said the Harvard team is just two years away from creating a hybrid embryo, in which mammoth traits would be programmed into an Asian elephant.

“Our aim is to produce a hybrid elephant-mammoth embryo,” said Prof George Church. “Actually, it would be more like an elephant with a number of mammoth traits. We’re not there yet, but it could happen in a couple of years.”

The creature, sometimes referred to as a “mammophant”, would be partly elephant, but with features such as small ears, subcutaneous fat, long shaggy hair and cold-adapted blood. The mammoth genes for these traits are spliced into the elephant DNA using the powerful gene-editing tool, Crispr.

Until now, the team have stopped at the cell stage, but are now moving towards creating embryos – although, they said that it would be many years before any serious attempt at producing a living creature.

“We’re working on ways to evaluate the impact of all these edits and basically trying to establish embryogenesis in the lab,” said Church.

Since starting the project in 2015 the researchers have increased the number of “edits” where mammoth DNA has been spliced into the elephant genome from 15 to 45.

“We already know about ones to do with small ears, subcutaneous fat, hair and blood, but there are others that seem to be positively selected,” he said.

Church said that these modifications could help preserve the Asian elephant, which is endangered, in an altered form. However, others have raised ethical concerns about the project.

Matthew Cobb, professor of zoology at the University of Manchester, said: “The proposed ‘de-extinction’ of mammoths raises a massive ethical issue – the mammoth was not simply a set of genes, it was a social animal, as is the modern Asian elephant. What will happen when the elephant-mammoth hybrid is born? How will it be greeted by elephants?”

Church also outlined plans to grow the hybrid animal within an artificial womb rather than recruit a female elephant as a surrogate mother - a plan which some believe will not be achievable within the next decade.

“We hope to do the entire procedure ex-vivo (outside a living body),” he said. “It would be unreasonable to put female reproduction at risk in an endangered species.”

He added that his lab is already capable of growing a mouse embryo in an artificial womb for 10 days - halfway through its gestation period.

“We’re testing the growth of mice ex-vivo. There are experiments in the literature from the 1980s but there hasn’t been much interest for a while,” he said. “Today we’ve got a whole new set of technology and we’re taking a fresh look at it.”

“Church’s team is proposing to rear the embryo in an ‘artificial womb’ which seems ambitious to say the least – the resultant animal would have been deprived of all the pre-birth interactions with its mother,” said Cobb.

The woolly mammoth roamed across Europe, Asia, Africa and North America during the last Ice Age and vanished about 4,000 years ago, probably due to a combination of climate change and hunting by humans.

Their closest living relative is the Asian, not the African, elephant.

“De-extincting” the mammoth has become a realistic prospect because of revolutionary gene editing techniques that allow the precise selection and insertion of DNA from specimens frozen over millennia in Siberian ice.

Church helped develop the most widely used technique, known as Crispr/Cas9, that has transformed genetic engineering since it was first demonstrated in 2012. Derived from a defence system bacteria use to fend off viruses, it allows the “cut and paste” manipulation of strands of DNA with a precision not seen before.

Gene editing and its ethical implications is one of the key topics under discussion at the Boston conference.

Church, a guest speaker at the meeting, said the mammoth project had two goals: securing an alternative future for the endangered Asian elephant and helping to combat global warming. Woolly mammoths could help prevent tundra permafrost from melting and releasing huge amounts of greenhouse gas into the atmosphere.

“They keep the tundra from thawing by punching through snow and allowing cold air to come in,” said Church. “In the summer they knock down trees and help the grass grow.”

The scientists intend to engineer elephant skin cells to produce the embryo, or multiple embryos, using cloning techniques. Nuclei from the reprogrammed cells would be placed into elephant egg cells whose own genetic material has been removed. The eggs would then be artificially stimulated to develop into embryos.

Church predicts that age-reversal will become a reality within 10 years as a result of the new developments in genetic engineering.
 

jason73

Yuri Bezmenov was right
First 100
Jan 15, 2015
73,000
134,473
i got a crazy beard right now.ive gone from tank to roy nelson
 

SC MMA MD

TMMAC Addict
Jan 20, 2015
5,715
10,841
Do their justifications for the project seem a little flimsy: including saving elephants through an as yet unexplained mechanism, preventing further global warming by punching holes in the snow to let cold air keep the permafrost frozen, and knocking down trees so grass can grow (I thought that was a bad thing for the environment)? I think they just want to see if they can do it.
 

Robbie Hart

All Biden Voters Are Mindless Sheep
Feb 13, 2015
49,837
50,793
I hope it happens and they let them roam city streets, will help clear up some of the congestion
 

Grateful Dude

TMMAC Addict
May 30, 2016
8,925
14,262
I think they just want to see if they can do it.
Bingo.

Don't get me wrong, this is a pretty big leap for the advancement of genetics, and I think CRISPR is fascinating. But they're also making some big assumptions on what they're expecting the results to be. They've got a long way to go before this is plausible.
 

nuraknu

savage
Jul 20, 2016
6,247
10,770
This is cray-cray. While yes, we should try to keep the permafrost from melting, creating an animal that will in turn probably lead to new viruses etc. is a lazy way to do it because they can't get people to cooperate.

Also, it was a little unclear, but it sounds like this species is endangered, so let's mess with it so we can move it to a new climate zone where most people don't like to live? Idk. I get it, it's a solution, but what about the ecosystems they will be disrupting...this is a pandora's box, and possibly the beginning of made-for-syfy channel B-movie sci-fi horror thriller. I feel like reading this article is like watching it and shouting to the pretty girl "no, don't run that way" and rolling my eyes.

I think everyone who reads this thread should watch the series Fortitude (I think it's 12 episodes, on Amazon Prime right now, warning for graphic depictions of lots of things). Then come back and talk about your feelings.
 

Mix6APlix

The more you cry, the less I care.
Oct 20, 2015
12,918
13,449
Viruses. The herd needs culling. We bring back so prehistoric shot that wipes out 80% of us.....? I'm all for it.
 

Bluesville

First 100
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
2,571
2,954
lol

I suppose it's a good thing that they didn't pick a predatory dinosaur, but couldn't they have gone with something a bit smaller and less likely to go on a rampage?
 

Mix6APlix

The more you cry, the less I care.
Oct 20, 2015
12,918
13,449
lol

I suppose it's a good thing that they didn't pick a predatory dinosaur, but couldn't they have gone with something a bit smaller and less likely to go on a rampage?
Have you never seen the documentary Jurassic Park? Raptors are way more likely to rampage than mammoths.
 

Bluesville

First 100
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
2,571
2,954
Have you never seen the documentary Jurassic Park? Raptors are way more likely to rampage than mammoths.
I have. That's the positive side.

A mammoth could fuck things up royally too.

Isn't there an extinct shrew they could bring back to life?