Actually, I believe "a mma star" is correct. You wouldn't say "an mixed martial arts star".He said "a mma star", it's "an mma star", that's when I dropped off and lost interest
If using the full description, yes.....but do you say "I'm going to have a m and m"Actually, I believe "a mma star" is correct. You wouldn't say "an mixed martial arts star".
I could be wrong, I'm no expert. However, it seems like one of those cases where it sounds wrong to say it the correct way.If using the full description, yes.....but do you say "I'm going to have a m and m"
it's based on the phonetic sound of the first syllable.Actually, I believe "a mma star" is correct. You wouldn't say "an mixed martial arts star".
an "em and em"If using the full description, yes.....but do you say "I'm going to have a m and m"
A mikstit's based on the phonetic sound of the first syllable.
an "em em ay" star.
a "mi xsd" martial arts star.
Those are full words and not abbreviations.A mikst
but yes this is spot on. Same reason we say a university and an honor.
The letter M is not an abbreviation or an acronym.Those are full words and not abbreviations.
If using the full description, yes.....but do you say "I'm going to have a m and m"
In the term "MMA" it is.The letter M is not an abbreviation or an acronym.
The only reason it's an is because of the letter M, which is pronounced em.In the term "MMA" it is.
The meaning of the "M" itself doesn't change.The only reason it's an is because of the letter M, which is pronounced em.
"A U.N. meeting." would be correct, just as "A United Nations meeting." is correct. You wouldn't say "An United Nations meeting"?It would be the same as saying a U.N. meeting.
No, for the same reason I wouldn't say an mixed martial arts fighter.The meaning of the "M" itself doesn't change.
"A U.N. meeting." would be correct, just as "A United Nations meeting." is correct. You wouldn't say "An United Nations meeting"?
I'm really not. Abbreviating a word to a single letter doesn't negate the complete word or in turn the meaning of the singular letter. The easiest example would be abbreviations associated with units of measurement. In some instances the word itself is replaced by a non linguistic character, but the pronunciation and how it's treated grammatically don't change.You're arguing just to argue.
I'm really not. Abbreviating a word to a single letter doesn't negate the complete word or in turn the meaning of the singular letter. The easiest example would be abbreviations associated with units of measurement. In some instances the word itself is replaced by a non linguistic character, but the pronunciation and how it's treated grammatically don't change.
Jew@ConorMcGregorsBeard you're gonna force me to think of an acronym in which the letter "u" in the word sounds like oo and not yoo. I don't feel like it.
call an Uber, it's a ubiquitous service.@ConorMcGregorsBeard you're gonna force me to think of an acronym in which the letter "u" in the word sounds like oo and not yoo. I don't feel like it.