General 10 dead in Buffalo supermarket shooting

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up

John Lee Pettimore

Further south than you
May 18, 2021
6,302
6,762
You can "disagree" all you want, Thuglife13 @Thuglife13, but the guy (and several others as well) have literally spelled it out for you. They WANT you to know that the right wing lying garbage blogs directly inspired them to do this - it's very important to them that this be known.

??
 

Splinty

Shake 'em off
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
44,116
91,096
You can "disagree" all you want, Thuglife13 @Thuglife13, but the guy (and several others as well) have literally spelled it out for you. They WANT you to know that the right wing lying garbage blogs directly inspired them to do this - it's very important to them that this be known.

??
Richard Spencer, Mike cernovich, and a few others were all involved in some offshoots of the daily stormer where Nazis like SpencerSpencer found sympathetic listeners in free speech absolutists and made plans openly to shift the overton window of acceptable public discourse to bring so-called intellectual racism to the front and be part of the normal public conversation. They specifically describe using humor to cover their true intention so that They could tell any detractors that they were just joking and why are you being so serious. This would also make unpopular topics about blacks and jews Palatable by hiding it under a joke. And they found plenty of sympathizers in nerdy white basement dwellers who were largely NEETs or technologists and free speech absolutists.
This plan worked exactly as intended on these smaller sites and would later move on to chan where edgelord jokes got replaced with actual racists. And that's where the cesspool continues to largely trickle from out to public social media. So actual racist launch a plan to co-opt sympathetic losers and give cover against detractors. And it's working.
 

Splinty

Shake 'em off
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
44,116
91,096
Anyways, under my rule, nobody with a diagnosed mental illness can reproduce.
Then guys like this don't get born.
It's sad that mental illness remains so stigmatized that you think this would work

Do people have family histories of heart disease? Of course. Do people get heart disease without family history due to not taking care of their physical being of course.

Mental health is no different. Go ahead and stop everybody with a diagnosis from procreating. Life will still calls, mental health, declines in plenty of us. And that's not a result of family genetics. It's a result of life.
 

Speaker to Animals

encephalopathetic
May 16, 2021
8,161
7,428
It's sad that mental illness remains so stigmatized that you think this would work

Do people have family histories of heart disease? Of course. Do people get heart disease without family history due to not taking care of their physical being of course.

Mental health is no different. Go ahead and stop everybody with a diagnosis from procreating. Life will still calls, mental health, declines in plenty of us. And that's not a result of family genetics. It's a result of life.
But the numbers would plummet, yes?
If it happened, that would benefit future generations.
I'm not saying discontinue medical research.
 

Splinty

Shake 'em off
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
44,116
91,096
But the numbers would plummet, yes?
If it happened, that would benefit future generations.
I'm not saying discontinue medical research.
I don't know That's true. You're talking about eliminating children from anybody with a diagnosis that has heritable increased risk. The risk of being bipolar is 1% with no bipolar parent. It's 8% with a bipolar parent. That means that bipolar patients have a 92% chance that they do not have a bipolar child.
So you will eliminate the 7% increase of bipolar child offspring while also eliminating the 92% chance of having non-bipolar kids diluting out those bipolar numbers.

Again, to say this in reverse, 99% chance your child doesn't have bipolar. 92% chance your child doesn't have bipolar If you do have bipolar.
Getting rid of people that have a 92% chance of not having a bipolar child seems unlikely to make a significant dent in population outcomes, given that both sides of the coin have such low absolute risk.
 

Splinty

Shake 'em off
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
44,116
91,096
Most heart disease is caused by societys Input. Is most mental health caused by society as well?

I don't know. But being hyper focused on heritable disease ignores what we see in other diseases that are based on society and lifestyle.
 

Speaker to Animals

encephalopathetic
May 16, 2021
8,161
7,428
I don't know That's true. You're talking about eliminating children from anybody with a diagnosis that has heritable increased risk. The risk of being bipolar is 1% with no bipolar parent. It's 8% with a bipolar parent. That means that bipolar patients have a 92% chance that they do not have a bipolar child.
So you will eliminate the 7% increase of bipolar child offspring while also eliminating the 92% chance of having non-bipolar kids diluting out those bipolar numbers.

Again, to say this in reverse, 99% chance your child doesn't have bipolar. 92% chance your child doesn't have bipolar If you do have bipolar.
Getting rid of people that have a 92% chance of not having a bipolar child seems unlikely to make a significant dent in population outcomes, given that both sides of the coin have such low absolute risk.
You're world domination plans shaming
 

kaladin stormblessed

Nala fanboy
Apr 24, 2017
17,637
20,147
I don't know That's true. You're talking about eliminating children from anybody with a diagnosis that has heritable increased risk. The risk of being bipolar is 1% with no bipolar parent. It's 8% with a bipolar parent. That means that bipolar patients have a 92% chance that they do not have a bipolar child.
So you will eliminate the 7% increase of bipolar child offspring while also eliminating the 92% chance of having non-bipolar kids diluting out those bipolar numbers.

Again, to say this in reverse, 99% chance your child doesn't have bipolar. 92% chance your child doesn't have bipolar If you do have bipolar.
Getting rid of people that have a 92% chance of not having a bipolar child seems unlikely to make a significant dent in population outcomes, given that both sides of the coin have such low absolute risk.
Plus, people who die of cancer can live long, happy, fruitful lives. Same of heart disease. Same of bipolar.

Case in point, Ashley (halsey) frangipani is bipolar. Ergo her album "manic" which has brightened the moments, days. and lives of millions


View: https://youtu.be/YO0T4ijf4LI
 

Rambo John J

Eats things that would make a Billy Goat Puke
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
71,720
71,602
We need fertility laws and birth rights awarded based on merit.

Good genetics... no history of heart disease, mental illness, cancer, etc.
We could eliminate inherited disease in a few generations
Uhhh

what the fuck are you talking about?

talk about a slippery slope, why just not do the same for those that don't share your same opinions?
 

Rambo John J

Eats things that would make a Billy Goat Puke
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
71,720
71,602
Most heart disease is caused by societys Input. Is most mental health caused by society as well?

I don't know. But being hyper focused on heritable disease ignores what we see in other diseases that are based on society and lifestyle.
the last two years have created and accelerated lot of mental illness

I know two suicides from the first few months of "lockdown"

that solution was far worse than any strain of illness

sad but true