1
Humanmetrics Jung Typology Test
- Thread starter jason73
- Start date
interesting article friend sent me about Floyd (ESFP) vs Conor (ESTP)
What is the difference between ESFP and ESTP? | FamousTypes
What is the difference between ESFP and ESTP? | FamousTypes
1
1031
Guest
Maybe. I figure I should take it again tomorrow and see how it compares. I think it was like 38% 3% 9% and 28% of whatever the letters represent. The thing about the questions is I was always thinking "well that depends." What I mean is, some things I don't plan and some things I do....like, I don't exactly plan when I'm going to go to sleep but for other things I do. So I just went with my first reaction but then I thought "wait... now does this mean I'm making emotional decisions and not analytical?" Blah blah blah, know what I mean?
I just had to read some of his stuff for psychology classes my knowledge of him is probably that of a freshman in college or a senior in high school. psychology or sociology was the major for jocks most mma fighters majored in that in college.@Jesus X are you interested in Jung?
A lot of jitsu guys became doctors where I was.
Do you find it interesting?
I agree...some questions could change via mood
but your above post fits perfectly with what I read as description of your personality type assigned by the test IMO
the questions were all pretty clear cut for me except for maybe 3 of them
1
1031
Guest
I took it again and it was INTP:
Introvert(28%) iNtuitive(25%) Thinking(1%) Perceiving(6%)
- You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (28%)
- You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing (25%)
- You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling (1%)
- You have slight preference of Perceiving over Judging (6%)
You plan your actions in advance- well yeah I don't just shit my drawers if I have to go but does that constitute planning? What do we mean by "plan," it's all relative.
You feel at ease in a crowd. -How big is the crowd? Who are they? Where are we? What are we doing? = it's all relative
The more people you speak to, the better you feel.- Who are these people? What are we speaking about? How much listening am I doing?
Words like: easily, often, tend to, frequently and somewhat are all interpretive imo.
That said, you (and the test) are probably right as the test, more or less, spit out the same thing twice.
Cool
I read that personality type on a few different sites and it seems identical to how you come across via text ...your the Logician Bro
Not saying I know you personally but that is how you comes across to me.
The traits it described me as are so dead on it is scary...I almost always get assigned the leader(not because of intellect or physicality though, just based on some personality characteristic that others notice in me) when I get involved with large groups. That happened on every sports team I played on and in every Job I had that involved a crew of people. I don't really enjoy it but others always suggest I take that role. I was not the best player in any sport but I was asked to call plays for my offense(as a Running Back even though QB usually has that job) and defense(Linebacker) in football and also asked to lead player huddles/meetings in Basketball and Baseball also. Used to lead crews/jobs of 20 construction people and was very successful at it(stressful though), I was promoted to crew leader fast over far more skilled and experience people just because it made things work efficiently.
It also pegged the parts of my personality that are "too much" for others to deal with on occasion, and those come across in my text also I believe at times. These are things that I work on and struggle with daily. My gifts of clarity, assertiveness, and quick debate is also my curse.
very interesting stuff.
well the thread is from 2015...somebody dusted it off and it got new life
But I would be interested in seeing a bunch of TMMAC posters take and post results, it is enlightening.
I had some problems to, it had to do with certain traits that I’ve been working on over the years that wish I could change.
A fren told me u gotta be aware of your core-self and your developed self.
Core-self is your truest self from the past and developed-self is you, now which includes all the education, influences, changed values due to changing circumstances and so on,
One of the questions were about “do you plan ahead or be spontaneous” and my answers were split, cuz my old self was always about planning, but my current self is trying hard to be spontaneous.
If I answer the question considering my core-self, the results come out as INFJ,
If I answer the questions considering my developed, current, up-to-date self, I become INFP
Both description seemed to fit me very well
Try different versions of the test
Free personality test, type descriptions, relationship and career advice | 16Personalities
1
1031
Guest
Yeah, that has some merit to it. It's probably best for me not to get too wrapped up in such tests (I'd analyze it until kingdom come). It's interesting in some way but without any practical use (at present) I'll be happy with this result.
That’s probably one of your traits
I just thought it was interesting to understand myself more throughly, work on my weaknesses to become more balanced person,
Balanced person is a happy person
M
member 1013
Guest
List them please
M
member 1013
Guest
This is me to a T
I didn’t read t but it’s still me I know these things so trust me.
To outsiders, INTJs may appear to project an aura of "definiteness", of self-confidence. This self-confidence, sometimes mistaken for simple arrogance by the less decisive, is actually of a very specific rather than a general nature; its source lies in the specialized knowledge systems that most people of this type start building at an early age. When it comes to their own areas of expertise -- and INTJs can have several -- they will be able to tell you almost immediately whether or not they can help you, and if so, how. INTJs know what they know, and perhaps still more importantly, they know what they don't know.
People of this type are perfectionists, with a seemingly endless capacity for improving upon anything that takes their interest. What prevents them from becoming chronically bogged down in this pursuit of perfection is the pragmatism so characteristic of the type: INTJs apply (often ruthlessly) the criterion "Does it work?" to everything from their own research efforts to the prevailing social norms. This in turn produces an unusual independence of mind, freeing them from the constraints of authority, convention, or sentiment for its own sake.
INTJs are known as the "Systems Builders" of the types, perhaps in part because they possess the unusual trait combination of imagination and reliability. Whatever system this type happens to be working on is for them the equivalent of a moral cause to an INFJ; both perfectionism and disregard for authority may come into play, as INTJs can be unsparing of both themselves and the others on the project. Anyone considered to be "slacking," including superiors, will lose their respect -- and will generally be made aware of this; INTJs have also been known to take it upon themselves to implement critical decisions without consulting their supervisors or co-workers. On the other hand, they do tend to be scrupulous and even-handed about recognizing the individual contributions that have gone into a project, and have a gift for seizing opportunities which others might not even notice.
PS
@Leigh people who say alpha are beta get in my guard bro
I didn’t read t but it’s still me I know these things so trust me.
To outsiders, INTJs may appear to project an aura of "definiteness", of self-confidence. This self-confidence, sometimes mistaken for simple arrogance by the less decisive, is actually of a very specific rather than a general nature; its source lies in the specialized knowledge systems that most people of this type start building at an early age. When it comes to their own areas of expertise -- and INTJs can have several -- they will be able to tell you almost immediately whether or not they can help you, and if so, how. INTJs know what they know, and perhaps still more importantly, they know what they don't know.
People of this type are perfectionists, with a seemingly endless capacity for improving upon anything that takes their interest. What prevents them from becoming chronically bogged down in this pursuit of perfection is the pragmatism so characteristic of the type: INTJs apply (often ruthlessly) the criterion "Does it work?" to everything from their own research efforts to the prevailing social norms. This in turn produces an unusual independence of mind, freeing them from the constraints of authority, convention, or sentiment for its own sake.
INTJs are known as the "Systems Builders" of the types, perhaps in part because they possess the unusual trait combination of imagination and reliability. Whatever system this type happens to be working on is for them the equivalent of a moral cause to an INFJ; both perfectionism and disregard for authority may come into play, as INTJs can be unsparing of both themselves and the others on the project. Anyone considered to be "slacking," including superiors, will lose their respect -- and will generally be made aware of this; INTJs have also been known to take it upon themselves to implement critical decisions without consulting their supervisors or co-workers. On the other hand, they do tend to be scrupulous and even-handed about recognizing the individual contributions that have gone into a project, and have a gift for seizing opportunities which others might not even notice.
PS
@Leigh people who say alpha are beta get in my guard bro
M
member 1013
Guest
That was terrifying
M
member 1013
Guest
We are similar but I beat you in everything good except being unfriendly you weird wallflower
You know all this and I get that you are joking, but each type has its strengths ...high percentage tells a lot but does not win any prizeWe are similar but I beat you in everything good except being unfriendly you weird wallflower
these strengths/traits can lead to problems, at least in my case
nobody beat anybody...but it is good to be self aware of your type IMO
to me it seems skewing farther or Beating somebody in a percentage can have both positive and negative repercussions
Similarly those who are teetering on the line between traits also have holes in other areas
interesting stuff
you and Jason got that cold blooded//intelligent/introvert/judgemental personality it seems, interesting combo...U both mysterious mofos