General Looting n Protesting n Minneapolis

Freeloading Rusty said:
Racially charged?
Click to expand...
Don't play coy.....you know you used a racist dog whistle.

www.vox.com

The sneaky language today’s politicians use to get away with racism and sexism

Vox is a general interest news site for the 21st century. Its mission: to help everyone understand our complicated world, so that we can all help shape it. In text, video and audio, our reporters explain politics, policy, world affairs, technology, culture, science, the climate crisis, money...
www.vox.com www.vox.com
 
ThatOneDude said:
Don't play coy.....you know you used a racist dog whistle.

www.vox.com

The sneaky language today’s politicians use to get away with racism and sexism

Vox is a general interest news site for the 21st century. Its mission: to help everyone understand our complicated world, so that we can all help shape it. In text, video and audio, our reporters explain politics, policy, world affairs, technology, culture, science, the climate crisis, money...
www.vox.com www.vox.com
Click to expand...
No one is playing coy. Tell me what language I used that was racially charged?
 
PV1RY.gif

giphy.webp
 

Attachments

  • 1599844422450.png
    1599844422450.png
    175.2 KB · Views: 0
Splinty said:
You get a gun that might also be a replica. A replica requires a permanent disabling and there are a variety of laws usually pertaining to them as well. They confirm its a working gun that has the firing pin reversed. They document both the before and after.

The DA would then look to either 1> make their case with disabled gun still breaks some law 2> suggest evidence tampering. The latter is possible in this case since the police didn't arrive to seize the guns at that time, but rather the gun was handed over to the defense attorney a month later. The former doesn't appear to apply to the law the way it is written and should likely be thrown out.

Regardless, that would have been an interesting precedent to determine. If you know your gun is unloaded, disabled, what law are you breaking?
Click to expand...

www.kmov.com

Indictments allege McCloskeys altered pistol and 'obstructed prosecution'

A grand jury has indicted Mark and Patricia McCloskey Tuesday on charges of exhibiting guns at protesters in a June incident in their neighborhood.
www.kmov.com www.kmov.com

I'm so smRt.
 
Inside Job said:
Horrible brainwashed people doing horrible things

das wasup
Click to expand...
Fucking scum doing this with no consequences. The family said the cops like always didn't do shit eventhough we're told blacks walking down the street get shot on sight by black hating cops. The family has to pay the fees for the damage because the stuff was rented. They have a gofundme though and have gotten lots of support...

Damages done at our 3yr birthday party
 
Inside Job said:
How exactly did they tamper with the pistol?
will that be proved?

I thought she probably didn't even have a loaded gun when it happened...his scary black rifle was enough.
Click to expand...

Evidence that it was unloaded?
I've not seen that only that you asked how we know it's loaded.


Regarding tampering...

They will argue that it's really unlikely that she ran outside with a disabled pistol. But after breaking the law it's much more likely that she simply turned the firing pin around. The difference between that pistol working or not working is about 20 seconds worth of effort.
The pistol was not actually disabled permanently. It can be field stripped a part flipped 180° and put right back together. Can literally do it with no tools in about four or five motions.
 
Splinty said:
Evidence that it was unloaded?
I've not seen that only that you asked how we know it's loaded.


Regarding tampering...

They will argue that it's really unlikely that she ran outside with a disabled pistol. But after breaking the law it's much more likely that she simply turned the firing pin around. The difference between that pistol working or not working is about 20 seconds worth of effort.
The pistol was not actually disabled permanently. It was field stripped apart flipped 180° and put right back together. Can literally do it with no tools in about four or five motions.
Click to expand...
They have to prove that in court of course...sounds like speculation unless they have some wear marks that show it was recently tampered with.

Where did you read it was field stripped? How can they prove what time that happened exactly?

If I was defense I would argue what I felt was possible when I saw her poor discipline...that her husband knew she should not have a loaded gun in her hands in almost any situation other than save her own life self defense...and gave her the non functional visible threat...maybe she knew or maybe she didn't.

I have no inside information about the case.

If the mob can destroy at will and face zero charges then I don't think these folks deserve a felony...just my opinion, I only saw a photo and read two articles so far.



also
What kind of pistol was it?
 
Inside Job said:
They have to prove that in court of course...sounds like speculation unless they have some wear marks that show it was recently tampered with.
Click to expand...

As I said before, when I guessed that this might happen, I suspect it'll get thrown out because you can't prove it.

But be careful. Weapons crimes are weird things when it comes to proof. Guys who have a disassembled AR-15 get charged with possession of short barrel rifles for having the parts. Upper in one closet and a lower and another. They're not together. Alone they can't do anything. But they can be put together quickly with no tools. And with that it's enough for possession and a felony.
 
Splinty said:
As I said before, when I guessed that this might happen, I suspect it'll get thrown out because you can't prove it.

But be careful. Weapons crimes are weird things when it comes to proof. Guys who have a disassembled AR-15 get charged with possession of short barrel rifles for having the parts. Upper in one closet and a lower and another. They're not together. Alone they can't do anything. But they can be put together quickly with no tools. And with that it's enough for possession and a felony.
Click to expand...
Splinty said:
Google speech to text can't understand my normal speech. Edited.
Can be
Click to expand...
Ya
Makes sense

Those two folks are certainly gonna have access to a serious defense team if they want
Hard to stick much on them I suspect

Still wanna know what kind of pistol it was for some reason.
 
Inside Job said:
Still wanna know what kind of pistol it was for some reason.
Click to expand...



guns.fandom.com

Bryco Model 38

The Bryco Model 38, currently marketed as the Jimenez JA-380, is an inexpensive American "Saturday night special" pistol. The Model 38 was Bryco's most famous product, along with the Jennings J-22 which carried over. The weapon was later produced by Jimenez Arms when Bryco went out of business...
guns.fandom.com guns.fandom.com



View: https://youtu.be/ejFHtHbU_20
 
Splinty said:
guns.fandom.com

Bryco Model 38

The Bryco Model 38, currently marketed as the Jimenez JA-380, is an inexpensive American "Saturday night special" pistol. The Model 38 was Bryco's most famous product, along with the Jennings J-22 which carried over. The weapon was later produced by Jimenez Arms when Bryco went out of business...
guns.fandom.com guns.fandom.com



View: https://youtu.be/ejFHtHbU_20
Click to expand...

haha
Really that is the gun?

Does look like a real POS

75$ lol

He even calls it a training gun now that he broke it

The defense could use this video in court, how did you find such a perfect video?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top