is it true or untrue that Dr Fauci advocated for and approved gain of function research on coronavirus, much like the one that 'naturally-originated' in Wuhan, at a BSL4 in Wuhan? or is that CTard Life?We've had numerous threads of discussion about this in the past.@Maycee Barber Fan I think linked a damning study to the entirety of the idea.
@Maycee Barber Fan - you have the documents?
reminds me of the south park episode were atheism became a religion.
No, it's not true that the virus research happening in Wuhan was anything like the SARS-Cov 2 virus.is it true or untrue that Dr Fauci advocated for and approved gain of function research on coronavirus, much like the one that 'naturally-originated' in Wuhan, at a BSL4 in Wuhan? or is that CTard Life?
I wonder whos got the bigger pipette.....if you know what I mean.
I will get the highly qualified science men I know to evaluate all their posted science in said “science off” and a victor will be justly crowned. I’m talking bigly qualified science men here. This is serious.
My wife would probably be better qualified, but we will see what your "guy" comes up with.
www.politico.com
really? because IIRC it was Peter Daszak who said that it was a real shame that the thing they were working so hard to prevent happened at the place they were trying to prevent it. What is the difference between the research they were doing at Wuhan and the research that could result in a new pathogen entering the world?
my pipette is appropriately-sized.
in the end, science is just an appeal to authority. We should just post our resumes and credentials.
I just read in a nature magazine interview he was worried conspiracy theorists were going to misquote him
Credit scores next.
You're on Mrs. OneDude's shit list pal!
