Ronda Won't Switch Camps After Loss

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up

Ted Williams' head

It's freezing in here!
Sep 23, 2015
11,283
19,071
Her Judo has become simple and less dynamic.

Her striking is no where near wear one would expect if she is truly just focusing hands.

He doesn't have game planning.

Ronda was an Olympic athlete before Edmond. Her entire success is likely due to her previous years and a niche fight style that no one knew how to prepare.

Nothing until the Beth fight could even closely be considered an improvement in fight style. Literally the same head control to occasional ankle pick.

Wrestling? Nope.
Kicks? Two in the entire career -- both same fight against Miesha.


Holly didnt beat Ronda boxing. She beat her in MMA. The left arm up blocking shots. Defending the standard overhooks, and elbowing Ronda in the face.
Striking wise, Ronda ran forward throwing the same sloppy lead hook, despite Holly circling. There was nothing magical about Holly in the striking department other than how strong she hits due to technique. This was not a lot of clever head movement, dynamic strikes, etc by Holly. This was bull rush hooks with NO backup plan for an opponent that simply circled. Even 4 fights ago Ronda was losing the standup anytime someone circled...but they usually stopped and started to get in a straight line striking match, eventually losing to the Judo sweep. Holly just kept focused and did the same plan.


There is no net positive from Edmond that I can see. Holly would have had a higher chance of losing from more dynamic Judo than anything Edmond added to her game. And her time with Edmond has lowered that Judo threat.
Bro this is some keyboard warrior shit, I gotta be straight up with you.

No game planning... how do you know that? Are you in her camp? Maybe she had a very intricate game plan, but it was the wrong game plan. Maybe Edmond gave her the perfect game plan, but she couldn't execute. Maybe Ronda is telling the truth when she says she was out on her feet after getting tagged in the first round and was just on auto-pilot. It's happened plenty of times before. Pedro Rizzo doesn't remember his fight with Randleman. Tim Sylvia doesn't remember any of his fighter with Couture after the KD punch.

It's amazing what a loss does to people: submit all these high level challengers in under 30 seconds, ONE girl is able to defend an armbar and all of a sudden that means her Judo game has gone to shit. SMH man... I'm SMH 4REAL.

Nothing magical about Holly in the striking department other than she hits hard due to technique? Bro I have news for you, Holly is not a power puncher. Never was, never will be. She's a world champion pro boxer, considered the greatest female boxer of all time by some, so yeah, there is something very special about her striking. There's a lot more than goes into it than just moving in a circle. If it was that easy, every motherfucker in the UFC would just be dancing in circles.

Five years undefeated, only one fight made it out of the 1st round, revolutionized WMMA, became the biggest star in MMA and one of the biggest stars in sports... and there's no net positive from Edmond?

Bro, I ain't even mad at you, I'm just disappointed.
 
D

Deleted member 1

Guest
Bro, I ain't even mad at you, I'm just disappointed.

I'm now getting off the airplane I was boarding when I wrote that post on a phone. Meetings and work all day.

I have a thorough response, but you're gonna have to be less disappointed when I back my position.

You've added a ton of implication to what I posted about Edmond, not about Ronda.
 

Qat

QoQ
Nov 3, 2015
16,379
22,498
Let's not forget that Ronda was gassed and considerably slower / more sloppy in the Tate-fight as well, from the second round on. She wasn't able to bullrush and chase her all around the cage any more. Tate was just.. not able to profit.

As a coach you have to see that and change shit and get her in better shape for this kind of gameplan, or change the gameplan. But I am probably not wrong when I believe that the opposite happened, and Ronda was once again just told how great she was.
 

delightone

Insert Crown here
First 100
Jan 14, 2015
3,437
4,266
I agree 100%. She doesn't need to outbox Holm. No woman in MMA is going to outbox her but that doesn't mean she's unbeatable. She has flaws in her game just like everyone else. The problem with Ronda staying with Edmund is he's not a strategist. He's a boxing coach. She needs to be with someone who can design a training camp around exploiting Holm's weaknesses, not one trying to beat her at what she does best. It's just fuckin stupid.

I really want Ronda to come back and get the title again and prove everybody wrong but I'm not getting my hopes up if nothing changes.
she'll never out box holm, what she need is some training in takedowns and how to get to the clinch and keeping her there in holm's transitions, as soon as she can do that it's armbar galore again.
 
D

Deleted member 1

Guest
Bro this is some keyboard warrior shit, I gotta be straight up with you.

No game planning... how do you know that? Are you in her camp? Maybe she had a very intricate game plan, but it was the wrong game plan. Maybe Edmond gave her the perfect game plan, but she couldn't execute. Maybe Ronda is telling the truth when she says she was out on her feet after getting tagged in the first round and was just on auto-pilot. It's happened plenty of times before. Pedro Rizzo doesn't remember his fight with Randleman. Tim Sylvia doesn't remember any of his fighter with Couture after the KD punch.


Nothing magical about Holly in the striking department other than she hits hard due to technique? Bro I have news for you, Holly is not a power puncher. Never was, never will be. She's a world champion pro boxer, considered the greatest female boxer of all time by some, so yeah, there is something very special about her striking. There's a lot more than goes into it than just moving in a circle. If it was that easy, every motherfucker in the UFC would just be dancing in circles.

Five years undefeated, only one fight made it out of the 1st round, revolutionized WMMA, became the biggest star in MMA and one of the biggest stars in sports... and there's no net positive from Edmond?

Bro, I ain't even mad at you, I'm just disappointed.
Lets begin.
You've significantly changed my message, so let me simplify it.
As I've stated over and over, Rousey is an athletic phenom, olympian, and I've gone so far as made other threads stating that no one other than Rousey could have done what she did. She had the right age, timing in the sport, and background. So lets not add any pretense that I'm just hating on her at all. I shouldn't have to even disclaim that, there you go. You made my post something it wasn't.

My point is that Rousey's greatness did not come from Edmond and as she advanced in her career, he went from adding minimal to taking her opportunity to move too a proper elite camp. Rousey is too talented for Edmond and once she learned two punches from him, that was time to move on.

Things you address:

No game planning... how do you know that? Are you in her camp? Maybe she had a very intricate game plan, but it was the wrong game plan. Maybe Edmond gave her the perfect game plan, but she couldn't execute. Maybe Ronda is telling the truth when she says she was out on her feet after getting tagged in the first round and was just on auto-pilot. It's happened plenty of times before. Pedro Rizzo doesn't remember his fight with Randleman. Tim Sylvia doesn't remember any of his fighter with Couture after the KD punch.

Game planning. Lets use the Holm fight since that's what we were discussing. I've watched about 10 Ronda fights since the Holm fight and I've got access to this one too. From reddit, an accurate recap of the difference between game planning and nothing but platitudes:

Rousey's Corner

  • Edmond's advice during the fight is completely braindead. He's constantly praising her and telling her that she's doing well, regardless of how many time Holm smashes that straight left into Rousey's mouth.
  • His main piece of substantive advice is to shout "Discipline!" and to tell her to keep her hands up. (Thanks, coach!)
  • Whenever Ronda is in serious trouble, Edmond says absolutely nothing. Nothing. When Ronda's stunned, he goes silent. When Holm takes Ronda down, he goes silent. In the last ~15 seconds of the fight, as Ronda's flailing around, then getting stunned, and then getting kicked in the head, it's just dead air. This is not a coach who has helpful things to say when the chips are down. Just brutal.
Holm's Corner

  • Listening to Holm's corner puts the terribleness of Rousey's corner work into perspective. Izzy Martinez does a lot of useless positive screaming, but he also says some helpful stuff and calls out some specific instructions in tense moments. Almost everything from Wink and Jackson is substantive and helpful.
  • Jackson said something hard to discern that sounds very interesting. They're describing some of Holm's excellent work in and getting out of the clinch, and Jackson says: "remember, don't mention that behind the head [mumble]" to anybody. I can't tell what, exactly, he's referring to. But it sounds like it's supposed to be a secret! Any thoughts?
That's one example of the difference in a world class team and Ronda's who tells her she's doing great and yells platitudes. Holm circled and head kicked like she does in many fights. There was no plan for it. If there was, there is ZERO evidence since Edmond (remember, that's who we are talking about) failed to redirect to mention any plan at anytime.

Where are all the transformations and smart game planning evidence? We can point to Jackson fighters one after another after another that adapt to the fight before and during.

Ronda has the tools and physicality to beat Holm. She has the wrong coaches to do it.


It's amazing what a loss does to people: submit all these high level challengers in under 30 seconds, ONE girl is able to defend an armbar and all of a sudden that means her Judo game has gone to shit. SMH man... I'm SMH 4REAL.
Who said it went to shit? Without a doubt its become significantly less dynamic. She isn't chaining 3, 4, 5 throws to funnel into that takedown.
I've watched Leigh @Leigh point out the weaknesses in the repeat uchimata that Ronda favors. And she has moved from chaining fake attempts to move the plane to using a bullrush with a jab to get the opponent on the backpedal. In no way is her Judo being displayed in any recent fights at near the level she was 3+ years ago. My statement is that her Judo is less dynamic and it is objectively. Is that because she can let it loose with the presence, athleticism she has over her competition, or what? Who knows. But just watch the fights and you'll see the deemphasizing of Judo combinations.

Nothing magical about Holly in the striking department other than she hits hard due to technique? Bro I have news for you, Holly is not a power puncher. Never was, never will be. She's a world champion pro boxer, considered the greatest female boxer of all time by some, so yeah, there is something very special about her striking. There's a lot more than goes into it than just moving in a circle. If it was that easy, every motherfucker in the UFC would just be dancing in circles.
If you will get back to reading what I posted, you'll see I was clearly talking only about the Holm/ Ronda fight. The point being that Ronda has been with Edmond for YEARS. He is a supposed "boxing expert". The point is that NOTHING in the striking end of Holly during the Ronda fight was so over the top magical as to make it a fight of elite striking versus elite striking. It was Holly pushing a game plan (yes circling, go watch the BJJSCOUT video Ronda's MMA career and see others have success circling until they get on the backpedal and stop -- its on youtube and I've posted in the forum) because Ronda was unprepared for something new. There was no amazing head movement from Holm, there was no incredible matrix footwork. Holm wasn't doing an Ali or Cruz or Dillashaw or Aldo or McGregor impression. She kept moving solid and I'm sure her punches landed much harder than the average WMMA athlete could land on the lateral movement. But short of that, there was some incredible striking barrier preventing Ronda from showcasing her skills learned from Edmond. Those skills learned from Edmond just don't exist further than what we see.

Again, the point is EDMOND and not Ronda. If Edmond is such a striking genius and Ronda is so improved from his tutelage where is Ronda's great striking after 5 years of working on it? Where are the other strikers that Edmond has built to show off his training? Ludwig and Jackson and others can point to their examples.


Five years undefeated, only one fight made it out of the 1st round, revolutionized WMMA, became the biggest star in MMA and one of the biggest stars in sports... and there's no net positive from Edmond?
Ronda spent 20 years learning Judo. She then was immediately successful in MMA when, in his own words, Edmond refused to train her.That wasn't Edmond's doing.

Edmond made her a star? It wasn't her 20 years of Judo? It wasn't her manager that paid her lights, got her the SI swimsuit shoots, sent out $10,000's in promos to get her into the UFC?

Edmond's benefit: Suspect striking training.

Edmond's cost: Who knows how much cost for a guy that has enough money to bet 200k at a time but is bankrupt. Time at the prime of her career. Bad habits that will take others time to undo.


Maybe Edmond isn't a bad coach. But he's not an elite one. And short of no striking training, I'm not sure there's any evidence that Edmond's inputs are a benefit.

Ronda hasn't succeeded BECAUSE of Edmond. She succeeded due to her own work and very unique background. She succeeded IN SPITE of him in many cases.

Ronda Rousey would have been a star and done the same or better in any other major MMA camp. She should have moved a couple years ago. She should move now.
 

Ted Williams' head

It's freezing in here!
Sep 23, 2015
11,283
19,071
Lets begin.
You've significantly changed my message, so let me simplify it.
As I've stated over and over, Rousey is an athletic phenom, olympian, and I've gone so far as made other threads stating that no one other than Rousey could have done what she did. She had the right age, timing in the sport, and background. So lets not add any pretense that I'm just hating on her at all. I shouldn't have to even disclaim that, there you go. You made my post something it wasn't.

My point is that Rousey's greatness did not come from Edmond and as she advanced in her career, he went from adding minimal to taking her opportunity to move too a proper elite camp. Rousey is too talented for Edmond and once she learned two punches from him, that was time to move on.

Things you address:




Game planning. Lets use the Holm fight since that's what we were discussing. I've watched about 10 Ronda fights since the Holm fight and I've got access to this one too. From reddit, an accurate recap of the difference between game planning and nothing but platitudes:

Rousey's Corner

  • Edmond's advice during the fight is completely braindead. He's constantly praising her and telling her that she's doing well, regardless of how many time Holm smashes that straight left into Rousey's mouth.
  • His main piece of substantive advice is to shout "Discipline!" and to tell her to keep her hands up. (Thanks, coach!)
  • Whenever Ronda is in serious trouble, Edmond says absolutely nothing. Nothing. When Ronda's stunned, he goes silent. When Holm takes Ronda down, he goes silent. In the last ~15 seconds of the fight, as Ronda's flailing around, then getting stunned, and then getting kicked in the head, it's just dead air. This is not a coach who has helpful things to say when the chips are down. Just brutal.
Holm's Corner

  • Listening to Holm's corner puts the terribleness of Rousey's corner work into perspective. Izzy Martinez does a lot of useless positive screaming, but he also says some helpful stuff and calls out some specific instructions in tense moments. Almost everything from Wink and Jackson is substantive and helpful.
  • Jackson said something hard to discern that sounds very interesting. They're describing some of Holm's excellent work in and getting out of the clinch, and Jackson says: "remember, don't mention that behind the head [mumble]" to anybody. I can't tell what, exactly, he's referring to. But it sounds like it's supposed to be a secret! Any thoughts?
That's one example of the difference in a world class team and Ronda's who tells her she's doing great and yells platitudes. Holm circled and head kicked like she does in many fights. There was no plan for it. If there was, there is ZERO evidence since Edmond (remember, that's who we are talking about) failed to redirect to mention any plan at anytime.

Where are all the transformations and smart game planning evidence? We can point to Jackson fighters one after another after another that adapt to the fight before and during.

Ronda has the tools and physicality to beat Holm. She has the wrong coaches to do it.




Who said it went to shit? Without a doubt its become significantly less dynamic. She isn't chaining 3, 4, 5 throws to funnel into that takedown.
I've watched Leigh @Leigh point out the weaknesses in the repeat uchimata that Ronda favors. And she has moved from chaining fake attempts to move the plane to using a bullrush with a jab to get the opponent on the backpedal. In no way is her Judo being displayed in any recent fights at near the level she was 3+ years ago. My statement is that her Judo is less dynamic and it is objectively. Is that because she can let it loose with the presence, athleticism she has over her competition, or what? Who knows. But just watch the fights and you'll see the deemphasizing of Judo combinations.



If you will get back to reading what I posted, you'll see I was clearly talking only about the Holm/ Ronda fight. The point being that Ronda has been with Edmond for YEARS. He is a supposed "boxing expert". The point is that NOTHING in the striking end of Holly during the Ronda fight was so over the top magical as to make it a fight of elite striking versus elite striking. It was Holly pushing a game plan (yes circling, go watch the BJJSCOUT video Ronda's MMA career and see others have success circling until they get on the backpedal and stop -- its on youtube and I've posted in the forum) because Ronda was unprepared for something new. There was no amazing head movement from Holm, there was no incredible matrix footwork. Holm wasn't doing an Ali or Cruz or Dillashaw or Aldo or McGregor impression. She kept moving solid and I'm sure her punches landed much harder than the average WMMA athlete could land on the lateral movement. But short of that, there was some incredible striking barrier preventing Ronda from showcasing her skills learned from Edmond. Those skills learned from Edmond just don't exist further than what we see.

Again, the point is EDMOND and not Ronda. If Edmond is such a striking genius and Ronda is so improved from his tutelage where is Ronda's great striking after 5 years of working on it? Where are the other strikers that Edmond has built to show off his training? Ludwig and Jackson and others can point to their examples.




Ronda spent 20 years learning Judo. She then was immediately successful in MMA when, in his own words, Edmond refused to train her.That wasn't Edmond's doing.

Edmond made her a star? It wasn't her 20 years of Judo? It wasn't her manager that paid her lights, got her the SI swimsuit shoots, sent out $10,000's in promos to get her into the UFC?

Edmond's benefit: Suspect striking training.

Edmond's cost: Who knows how much cost for a guy that has enough money to bet 200k at a time but is bankrupt. Time at the prime of her career. Bad habits that will take others time to undo.


Maybe Edmond isn't a bad coach. But he's not an elite one. And short of no striking training, I'm not sure there's any evidence that Edmond's inputs are a benefit.

Ronda hasn't succeeded BECAUSE of Edmond. She succeeded due to her own work and very unique background. She succeeded IN SPITE of him in many cases.

Ronda Rousey would have been a star and done the same or better in any other major MMA camp. She should have moved a couple years ago. She should move now.
You done convinced me.
 

Narcosynthesis

Posting Machine
May 25, 2015
2,720
3,723
She was quick enough to dump her manager that paid for her to live, when she started out, once a better option came along. He is now suing for restitution. I wouldn't say she is loyal to a fault.
So you're saying a better option than Edmund hasn't come along yet? This is interesting. Please elaborate.
 

Zeph

TMMAC Addict
Jan 22, 2015
24,348
31,961
So you're saying a better option than Edmund hasn't come along yet? This is interesting. Please elaborate.
No. I'm saying that loyalty to a fault isn't one of her characteristics. She may be staying with Edmund out of loyalty, but that doesn't make it one of her defining characteristics. That said, I think it is likely arrogance and confirmation bias from her camp and the people around her that has influenced her decision to stay with Edmund. I think she just thinks she had an off night.
 

Narcosynthesis

Posting Machine
May 25, 2015
2,720
3,723
No. I'm saying that loyalty to a fault isn't one of her characteristics. She may be staying with Edmund out of loyalty, but that doesn't make it one of her defining characteristics. That said, I think it is likely arrogance and confirmation bias from her camp and the people around her that has influenced her decision to stay with Edmund. I think she just thinks she had an off night.
I disagree. I've read she's very loyal to the people close to her but if she feels like she's been wronged then you end up on a shitlist that's hard to get off of. It's one of the things I admire about her because she doesn't waste time on people that don't deserve it. As far as her previous manager goes, we don't know the entire story. We know his side of the story because he wants the world to hear it but Ronda has said very little. Maybe Ronda doesn't feel like she owes him any money. That's why I keep saying we should let the court of law figure out what is owed or not owed.