It was a joke, cos I took the comparison with Orwell or Twain as a joke.What are you on about?
The guy is entitled to his privacy if that's what he wants. I mean, who cares?
How many pages can you come up with?Maybe I should write a book..
Ill just use a bigger font size. Or use smaller pages?12 pages too small soz
I'm all for promoting your own work. A lot of people use social media to boost their brand, etc., but yeah, saying how long the book is and that you think it's good seems a bit egotistical. I mean, of course the author is going to think it's frickin good ... Maybe have others give their remarks on the book.I won't read it. If the man tweets things like that about his own book... He thinks it's pretty good does he? Thanks for that...
One more thing -- he writes for Fightland, which I understand is owned or subsidized by the UFC, which would explain how he has access to all those UFC gifs without them cracking down on him ...I like that you call out Slack. I think he's decent in feeding stuff to the masses, but his hiding his identity makes everything a little suspect. He's also a sucker for any fighter from the Queen's lands or former colonies. His paeans to Prince Naseem were laughable.
I think most people wouldn't have a problem if he had just said, hey, I wrote a book, here's where you can get it, tell me what you think, not that it's this long and that it's pretty good. Who give a flying fuck how long it is. Size might matter in porn, but not in book writingI'm surprised at the reaction here. I've always liked Slacks breakdowns of striking and fights. I realize he was blowing his own horn with that post but it seems fitting when you consider who he was writing about.
It seems that the majority of posters think that self promotion is acceptable if you're a fighter but not if you're a writer. This was an unexpected and weird double standard I didn't see coming.
I did not know that.One more thing -- he writes for Fightland, which I understand is owned or subsidized by the UFC, which would explain how he has access to all those UFC gifs without them cracking down on him ...
The point I was trying to make is that Connor talks about how he is the best at everything all the time and people eat it up. Slack writes a book about Connor mentions the length and that he thinks it's good and people shit on him. The irony is strong.I think most people wouldn't have a problem if he had just said, hey, I wrote a book, here's where you can get it, tell me what you think, not that it's this long and that it's pretty good. Who give a flying fuck how long it is. Size might matter in porn, but not in book writing
I don't think one thing relates with the other. One guy is a professional fighter with a limited career timespan who has to promote himself with no regards to credibility and objectivity. In fact his own delusion is a fundamental part both of his performance and persona. He shouldn't be held to no higher standard in this matter; the other is a writer who (should) rely on his credibility and objectivity. Can't see the irony.The point I was trying to make is that Connor talks about how he is the best at everything all the time and people eat it up. Slack writes a book about Connor mentions the length and that he thinks it's good and people shit on him. The irony is strong.
Huh, ok, I see what you're saying, but Conor is Conor. He's been that way from day 1. Just because a dude writes a book about a guy who is a cocky flashy fighter, I guess I'm thinking the writer doesn't have to mimic that and be a cocky, flashy writer.The point I was trying to make is that Connor talks about how he is the best at everything all the time and people eat it up. Slack writes a book about Connor mentions the length and that he thinks it's good and people shit on him. The irony is strong.
He wrote a book on a dude who shamelessly self promotes and people love him for it. In turn he self promoted his book about this person and people hate him for it. Thats the irony.I don't think one thing relates with the other. One guy is a professional fighter with a limited career timespan who has to promote himself with no regards to credibility and objectivity. In fact his own delusion is a fundamental part both of his performance and persona. He shouldn't be held to no higher standard in this matter; the other is a writer who (should) rely on his credibility and objectivity. Can't see the irony.
Having said that, I don't like neither Slack or McGregor so I'm consistent anyway.
Damn. You replied while I was typing my reply.Huh, ok, I see what you're saying, but Conor is Conor. He's been that way from day 1. Just because a dude writes a book about a guy who is a cocky flashy fighter, I guess I'm thinking the writer doesn't have to mimic that and be a cocky, flashy writer.
I'm quick like that.Damn. You replied while I was typing my reply.
So what's your real name?Yikes, I seem to have pissed off a lot of people inadvertently. I'm glad at least one person got a laugh out of it though.
If you don't follow me on twitter, I post a lot of facetious and downright silly stuff. But then miscommunication of tone in writing is something that gets people into trouble all the time. The idea that I would seriously use 'it's pretty good' or its page count (which is fairly standard) to big it up is a bit strange.
Couple of guys in here who I remember being good fun from my Q&A but now seem to really dislike me, not sure what I can do about that without using the old 'it's a prank, bro' but most of what I do on social media is in the spirit of poking fun or making light of things. To those worrying the book is some kind of multi-chapter butt kissing, obviously I didn't write a full book praising Conor McGregor. There's a lot of material but I went over it on my podcast.
Edit: from 3 min mark, time stamp doesn't seem to work when embedded.
Based on your tweet, I'd imagine this is the first book you read since high school.