The shitty state of this thread is all Dana White's fault.
Things that will end better than a Conor fight would end for Khabib
- Thread starter Ted Williams' head
- Start date
Well... he's right about Islam. Have you read the Qur'an?@Leigh Reported.......
What I'm going to pick up on is;
Those are severe allegations that most definitely constitute fighter bashing if they aren't substantiated. Clock's ticking.
On fighting...
This clearly goes against the teaching of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), as narrated by Abu Hurayrah: “When any one of you fights, let him avoid (striking) the face.” (Narrated by al-Bukhaari, al-Fath, 5/215).
Al-Haafiz said: “This prohibition also includes all those who are struck for the purpose of hadd or ta’zeerpunishments or discipline. According to the hadeeth narrated by Abu Bakrah and others, which was recorded by Abu Dawood and others, about the woman who had committed adultery, the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) commanded that she should be stoned to death, and said, ‘Stone her, but avoid the face.’ (Narrated by Abu Dawood, 4/152). If that is the command in the case of one who is being punished and is going to die anyway, then the rule is even more applicable in cases of lesser severity.” See al-Fath, 5/216
Al-Nawawi said: “The scholars said: it is forbidden to strike the face because it is soft and all of a person's beauty and most of his senses are located there. If the face is hit, there is the fear that all or some of them may be destroyed or disfigured. Any defect in the face is a terrible thing because it is so prominent and obvious, and usually the person who is hit in the face will not be spared some disfigurement.” (al-Fath, 5/216).
In al-Fath, he says concerning the specific prohibition narrated in the hadeeth:
“Al-Nawawi did not discuss the details of this prohibition. It is clear that it is haraam, and this is supported by the hadeeth of Suwayd ibn Maqran al-Sahaabi, that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) saw a man slap a slave (or a boy) in the face, and he said, “Do you not know that the face is inviolate?” (Muslim, 3/1280.)
So it seems like Islam would be against pro fighting, but then again it would be hard to imagine Jesus, Buddha, etc, would be cool with beating people up and giving them concussions for a living.
I think the common thread with all religion is that most participants cherry pick which ideals they do and don't follow!
This clearly goes against the teaching of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), as narrated by Abu Hurayrah: “When any one of you fights, let him avoid (striking) the face.” (Narrated by al-Bukhaari, al-Fath, 5/215).
Al-Haafiz said: “This prohibition also includes all those who are struck for the purpose of hadd or ta’zeerpunishments or discipline. According to the hadeeth narrated by Abu Bakrah and others, which was recorded by Abu Dawood and others, about the woman who had committed adultery, the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) commanded that she should be stoned to death, and said, ‘Stone her, but avoid the face.’ (Narrated by Abu Dawood, 4/152). If that is the command in the case of one who is being punished and is going to die anyway, then the rule is even more applicable in cases of lesser severity.” See al-Fath, 5/216
Al-Nawawi said: “The scholars said: it is forbidden to strike the face because it is soft and all of a person's beauty and most of his senses are located there. If the face is hit, there is the fear that all or some of them may be destroyed or disfigured. Any defect in the face is a terrible thing because it is so prominent and obvious, and usually the person who is hit in the face will not be spared some disfigurement.” (al-Fath, 5/216).
In al-Fath, he says concerning the specific prohibition narrated in the hadeeth:
“Al-Nawawi did not discuss the details of this prohibition. It is clear that it is haraam, and this is supported by the hadeeth of Suwayd ibn Maqran al-Sahaabi, that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) saw a man slap a slave (or a boy) in the face, and he said, “Do you not know that the face is inviolate?” (Muslim, 3/1280.)
So it seems like Islam would be against pro fighting, but then again it would be hard to imagine Jesus, Buddha, etc, would be cool with beating people up and giving them concussions for a living.
I think the common thread with all religion is that most participants cherry pick which ideals they do and don't follow!
I have read every religious book in parts. There is no where in Islam to rape non Muslims or to mutilate.
Christians and Jews are not really considered non Muslims because Its a must for them to follow Jesus and Moses or you can't be a Muslim. There is Taliban version of Islam then ISIS version of Islam . There is no burka in Islam too.
The Old Testament law lists a number of behaviors that were punishable by death, including adultery. “If a man commits adultery with another man’s wife—with the wife of his neighbor—both the adulterer and the adulteress are to be put to death” (Leviticus 20:10). It is important to note that the punishment was the same for both parties involved. There was no double standard that made allowances for a man’s dalliances; he was punished right along with the woman.
You need to study a little harder... The old testament is just as bad as the Koran nothing especially ancient religion justifies any of the the busllshit Muslims justify and so called non-fundementalist Muslims refuse to condemn!
Rape in Islam - WikiIslam
M
member 603
Guest
HOLY FUCKBALLS!!! I come into this thread to talk some shit about Conor, and about this potential Khabib fight, and the bulk of it is this bullshit on Islam hating.... Get it together motherfuckers, get this shit outta here. Blubba Jenkins you need to get that TMZ bullshit the fuck outta here too.... Lock this fucking shit up.
wikilslam is fake.. Punishment for rape is death in islam.
read the fucking koran theres plenty of justification for rape incest murder etc. in there. So how fake is wikiislam when they quote directly from the koran?...sigh! Sick and tired of fucking apologist for death/misery cults! That goes for the old testament and any religious text/belief that tries to justify such bullshit!!
quote one
quote one
"33:50. O Prophet (Muhammad)! Verily, We have made lawful to you your wives, to whom you have paid their Mahr (bridal money given by the husband to his wife at the time of marriage), and those (captives or slaves) whom your right hand possesses - whom Allah has given to you, and the daughters of your 'Amm (paternal uncles) and the daughters of your 'Ammah (paternal aunts) and the daughters of your Khal (maternal uncles) and the daughters of your Khalah (maternal aunts) who migrated (from Makkah) with you, and a believing woman if she offers herself to the Prophet, and the Prophet wishes to marry her; a privilege for you only, not for the (rest of) the believers. Indeed We know what We have enjoined upon them about their wives and those (captives or slaves) whom their right hands possess, - in order that there should be no difficulty on you. And Allah is Ever Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful."
more: Myth: Muhammad Would Never Approve of Rape
It is against Islam to rape free Muslim women, but Muhammad actually encouraged the rape of others captured in battle. This hadith provides the context for the Quranic verse
(4:24):The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur’anic verse: (Sura 4:24) "And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess." (Abu Dawud 2150, also Muslim 3433)
Actually, as the hadith indicates, it wasn't Muhammad, but "Allah the Exalted" who told the men to rape the women in front of their husbands - which is all the more reason to think of Islam as being very different from other religions.
Note also that the husbands of these unfortunate victims were obviously alive after battle. This is important because it flatly contradicts those apologists who like to argue that the women Muhammad enslaved were widowed and thus unable to fend for themselves. (Even if the apologists were right, what sort of a moral code is it that forces a widow to choose between being raped and starving?)
You can try and spin it all you want but there is a reason these trash justify the things they do in the name of Allah and its been thoroughly researched and proven for anyone who wants to look. I'm done but I am sure you will try to claim its all a misinterpretation etc. There are many peaceful Muslims however their lack of condemnation of all this speaks volumes. It means they are somewhat sympathetic with the radicals even though they do not participate with them in their violence against women and non believers. Otherwise they would be speaking out in major volume against it if they do not want to be associated with it. However very few of them do. They just whine about being PC on obscure forums like you here.
more: Myth: Muhammad Would Never Approve of Rape
It is against Islam to rape free Muslim women, but Muhammad actually encouraged the rape of others captured in battle. This hadith provides the context for the Quranic verse
(4:24):The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur’anic verse: (Sura 4:24) "And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess." (Abu Dawud 2150, also Muslim 3433)
Actually, as the hadith indicates, it wasn't Muhammad, but "Allah the Exalted" who told the men to rape the women in front of their husbands - which is all the more reason to think of Islam as being very different from other religions.
Note also that the husbands of these unfortunate victims were obviously alive after battle. This is important because it flatly contradicts those apologists who like to argue that the women Muhammad enslaved were widowed and thus unable to fend for themselves. (Even if the apologists were right, what sort of a moral code is it that forces a widow to choose between being raped and starving?)
You can try and spin it all you want but there is a reason these trash justify the things they do in the name of Allah and its been thoroughly researched and proven for anyone who wants to look. I'm done but I am sure you will try to claim its all a misinterpretation etc. There are many peaceful Muslims however their lack of condemnation of all this speaks volumes. It means they are somewhat sympathetic with the radicals even though they do not participate with them in their violence against women and non believers. Otherwise they would be speaking out in major volume against it if they do not want to be associated with it. However very few of them do. They just whine about being PC on obscure forums like you here.
Last edited:
Where is the rape?
You guys have basically strapped on bomb vests and Allah Ahkbar'd my Conor thread. Thanks a lot.
"What is best in life? To rape and to explode oneself upon thy infidels. LOL Allah Akhbar"
-Mohamed 1:83:09
-Mohamed 1:83:09
M
member 603
Guest
Oh oh.... Things
@Galt asks daily in the establishments he frequents..... Did I guess it correctly?
Don't get all snippy with me just because @conor mcgregor nut hugger alphaed you.Oh oh.... Things
M
member 603
Guest
A) I own him, he's my bitch
B) Don't act like it's NOT something you ask
C) Go to your room, you're drunk
Pretty sure you drove to Florida using an old map.
I haven't raped anyone in years.
Just 4 beers today, had a rough few days.
M
member 3289
Guest
He sent me the address to the old location of his gym.
When I PM'd him asking for the new location's address, it was crickets...
Vegans are rarely tough.
Your thread is horrible though, maybe make an actual decent thread, if you have the ability