Lol, okie dokie. So when quoting somebody, I'm only allowed to respond to exactly word for word what's quoted? I never attributed the justice system to you, I mentioned it, as the logical next step with these accusations. You know, expanding on the topic.
You do not know if this reporter was slammed by audio alone. When you piece the audio with the original eyewitness statement, it appears more likely...but when the eyewitness begins walking back details, it clearly becomes more convoluted. I never said he wasn't slammed, as there is not enough reasonable evidence to make such a positive statement one way or another. You're clearly making these determinations with either emotion or a preconceived bias, not based in evidentiary observation. I'm not going to continue to debate this silliness.