I like this. The problem is with Zuffa is that they seem to get behind somebody like Ronda more than the division itself. Same goes for Dana being the biggest star they consistently push every chance and not put that effort into creating more of their own. I wish they'd invest more in the roster they have instead of relying on guys like Brock and Phil Brooks to spike interest. WMMA needs to be more than the Ronda show IMO. You don't have to be a dominant force to get noticed just look at Bisping, Hardy, TKZ, Garcia, Guida......WoodenPupa;n32887 said:The beginning/prototype phase of any undertaking is always rough. Things half-work, and ideas out-populate reality. WMMA is in its crawling stages, but it can work if Zuffa really gets behind it.
I have a hard time taking any post of yours seriously because of that avatar, never change. :haha:dacofty;n32938 said:Im from a pretty large town and when i mention MMA everyone looks at me like I am stupid, So WMMA is even worse, there isnt many females out there that care about WMMA.
Good postSuicidalforlife;n33992 said:Good observations all round, not much to add... I just wish the womens divisions were left where the were with Organisations like invicta. It feels like because of Ronda was building momentum off the back of the popularity of Gina/Cyborg and because obviously she is ridiculously talented and ahead of the game the women got dragged into the limelight too soon. More time to develop is needed in an WMMA org where the girls can fight more, feels like there isn't enough room in the UFC for them, especially at 115.
I agree however I don't want to get rid of the women. The lack of room is a result of having over 100 welterweights and well over 50 in other classes. Although less skilled at least they are the top 25 women in the world for the most part. I could not care less about ww#73 vs ww#95.Suicidalforlife;33992 said:Good observations all round, not much to add... I just wish the womens divisions were left where the were with Organisations like invicta. It feels like because of Ronda was building momentum off the back of the popularity of Gina/Cyborg and because obviously she is ridiculously talented and ahead of the game the women got dragged into the limelight too soon. More time to develop is needed in an WMMA org where the girls can fight more, feels like there isn't enough room in the UFC for them, especially at 115.
Suicidalforlife;n33992 said:Good observations all round, not much to add... I just wish the womens divisions were left where the were with Organisations like invicta. It feels like because of Ronda was building momentum off the back of the popularity of Gina/Cyborg and because obviously she is ridiculously talented and ahead of the game the women got dragged into the limelight too soon. More time to develop is needed in an WMMA org where the girls can fight more, feels like there isn't enough room in the UFC for them, especially at 115.
bluesville;n34269 said:They bring it and they definitely deserve a platform. I hope they get the chance to continue developing. Too early to tell IMO. They are almost 20 years behind the men and it shows in A LOT of the fights.
I agree, I think that when it comes time for Ronda to move on to whatever that may be, then we will see whether the division can transition from having Ronda as the face to someone else or multiple other people picking up the reigns. That is of course if she doesn't lose in the mean time and somewhere else becomes the face, before she retires. Which seems unlikely, but may be the best thing for WMMA.D241;n34421 said:It's not the most promising, but UFC is great at promoting, so I voted too early to tell. Definitely growing pains at the very least.
I think that's a by product of the FOX deal. The UFC has way too many commitments to produce shows now and still keep doing PPVs. Everything is watered down and plus they are sticking women's fights on already watered down cards. It's like they are killing their own product.crowbar;n32376 said:Too early to tell bro.Even men`s MMA is slowly losing it`s fan base.
MMAHAWK;n34247 said:I agree however I don't want to get rid of the women. The lack of room is a result of having over 100 welterweights and well over 50 in other classes. Although less skilled at least they are the top 25 women in the world for the most part. I could not care less about ww#73 vs ww#95.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk