Thanks for clearing that up, I have no further questionsCocaine
It's good business to know what's going on in and around every part of their business. They can keep an eye on public perception and a lot of things. Plus find out a lot of stuff that they might not otherwise know.How does one know this?
Agree, just I'm a black and white, factual type person......ie, I usually want to hear something supporting it.It's good business to know what's going on in and around every part of their business. They can keep an eye on public perception and a lot of things. Plus find out a lot of stuff that they might not otherwise know.
The no gifs thing on other sites seemed pretty cut and dry to me. That and fan made promos getting the axe so they can control in what light they want you to view their fighter in. They own the likeness rights and all that. They would not know any of this stuff is floating around out there if they didn't have eyes on the street. Plus it's harder and harder getting a good river, they have teams watching out for this stuff so they can block it and make you pay their price.Agree, just I'm a black and white, factual type person......ie, I usually want to hear something supporting it.
One other thing while we're on the subject... You can believe this or not, it's up to you, but I have no reason to lie about such a thing. On another site I'm a part of, completely unrelated to mma, I was engaging in discussion with a group of people. I quoted one guy and asked him something regarding his post.Agree, just I'm a black and white, factual type person......ie, I usually want to hear something supporting it.
OP and this is correct. One example is when Chris Camozzi got his fight with Jacare. Someone posted in a thread about this fight should be made on short notice, and Chris posted he would take fight and Silva called him that night and asked if he was serious. It got done.also, when I would frequent other sites... I'd see random posters that I've never heard of suggesting things like "oh, what do you think about this fight if it were to happen" and while some are just curious posters, rest assured some are employed to be there and see what the word on the street is and how interested people are on certain match ups. It's free market analysis and research to maximize their investments.
This is also 100% correct. UFC has people spending time online searching for this, which is why no gifs on other places. Also why I mentioned it to Wild and admins to watch for thread titles with "ufc gifs, or video's" in them. They may not search inside threads but just for titles in search enginesThe no gifs thing on other sites seemed pretty cut and dry to me. That and fan made promos getting the axe so they can control in what light they want you to view their fighter in. They own the likeness rights and all that. They would not know any of this stuff is floating around out there if they didn't have eyes on the street. Plus it's harder and harder getting a good river, they have teams watching out for this stuff so they can block it and make you pay their price.
It's been apparent for a long time that this (imo fucked up) practice has been implemented.OP and this is correct. One example is when Chris Camozzi got his fight with Jacare. Someone posted in a thread about this fight should be made on short notice, and Chris posted he would take fight and Silva called him that night and asked if he was serious. It got done.
I dont know if I agree with it being "fucked up", if I was a matchmaker I suppose I'd check online to see what, and who is being talked aboutIt's been apparent for a long time that this (imo fucked up) practice has been implemented.
Gauging pubilc reaction is one thing. I don't see that as unethical.I dont know if I agree with it being "fucked up", if I was a matchmaker I suppose I'd check online to see what, and who is being talked about
No argument from me on that, but there is so much social media to read now a days I suppose it would be hard to avoid itGauging pubilc reaction is one thing. I don't see that as unethical.
However, attempting to influence it via subversion is unethical to me.