If we had a world cup of prophets, Mohammed would do worse than Saudi Arabia and lose his opening game to that elephant thing from India.
Lifestyle Official 2018 World cup thread
- Thread starter SongExotic2
- Start date
Phillip would bring it home. He once killed a team in Africa with his lightning. Look it up
Edit. I am kind
Lightning kills an entire football team
Edit. I am kind
Lightning kills an entire football team
He intentionally stepped on another player's ankle. He may not have stomped down hard, but the full weight with studs can be hard enough. It's violent conduct because he intentionally does it, just like a punch that grazes and does little damage is violent conduct because of the intent behind it. Neymar's exageration is an entirely separate issue, but there are rules to handle that that the ref's aren't using. They should ask him if he can carry on, if he can't call for a stretcher and take him off the field for treatment. He shouldn't be allowed to roll around on the floor for 3.5 minutes while the game is stopped, but the refs aren't utilizing the rules correctly.
Last edited:
You have shown me your true colors, I quoted your other post before you could go back and edit it, you are a racist deplorable sub human.
Also, the fact you don't even know who Taylor Twellman or Alexi Lalas are, but you think you can speak of Futbol further proves your ignorance.
All you are is a racist troll with a low IQ.
If we look at betting odds alone that is simply inaccurate.
It's true about 3/4 teams, but Uruguay aren't better than England.
I think Brazil and France are the two favorites to win it all, but if you think England have no chance of winning the cup then you obviously haven't been paying attention.
Talk about a logic fail on your part. The reason Uraguay is 14 to 1 is because they are on the strong side and place France next and if they win they have to play Belgium or Brazil after that.
Hence why Croatia is given closer odds, ditto England, because they don't have to play the best team until the final. Also, where do I say England has no shot, England does have a shot. they have the much easier road to the final, and if they get there they could possibly catch Brazil or France or Belgium having an off day and win it.
Complete logic fail by you, as I knew you would show lol.
Lol.
M
member 3289
Guest
If we went by your falafel logic then Belgium would be +1400 underdogs as well.
Btw +1400 is not 14 to 1.
Stick to selling carpets.
+1400 is 14 to 1, what planet are you from.
Right now Uraguay is a +350 dog to win in regulation time against France, if I put a dollar on them, i win 3.5 dollars, last time I checked that means if they where a +700 dog, that dollar would win me 7 dollars, see where this id heading, more logic states that a +1400 is double that, and double 7 dollars is 14, damn you are a fool to say it politely.
Also, nice racist comment telling me sell carpets
Another deplorable sub human right there with your butt buddy
You live in Miami and you can't even get into overrated clubs, stick to having intimacies with squirrels you racist dork nut
Last edited:
I'm too lazy to read the last couple pages of this thread or the 9 reports calling for moderation. So please stop doing whatever you people are doing or the screws(Adolph Splinty and Harvey Wildstein) are gonna come in here and lock the thread. We barely made it through the Harry Potter talk itt a couple pages back. Go make a new thread for the bullshit and keep this thread for civil World Cup discussion.
Fuck off. Okay? Thanks.
I'm gonna go take a shit.
Fuck off. Okay? Thanks.
I'm gonna go take a shit.
\
Well said, hopefully the 2 trolls @Robby Hart and @conor mcgregor nut hugger will go back in their Mom's basements.
Last edited:
It was until the 2 racists started showing who they really are
You missed the edit chief tandy
You did, fucko.
LOL
I don't like the refs intervening for stuff like that but can't argue with your reasoning. IMO there is a small yet reasonable margin for agreeing with the yellow card but the most logical, straightforward thinking it's red card - and fucking up the game in the process.
I think on top of that, they need to have more injury time added than they do, at least in the 2nd half. Even the games where they give you 5 or 6 extra time minutes, really the delay time is always like 9 to 12 minutes, I would rather have more stoppage time added. Whatever the fuck we can do to avoid having a game be decided by penalty kicks, which I deplore.
I have a few other things I would like to see change
They seem to have a standard minimum five minutes second half injury time in this WC which I like. But yeah it rarely makes up effectively for the lost time during regulation. Hard to fix that.
Hey what are your thoughts on games being decided by penalty kicks, it's insane to me. I cannot stand it and there are so many other ways that are smarter. It would be like deciding an NBA game by a free throw shooting contest.
I really good friend of mine who passed away tragically years ago had a great idea, which he said he heard somewhere I think.
What he was proposing was if it is a knockout game, and it's tied after regulation time of 90 minutes plus stoppage time then you reduce players as you go into stoppage time.
For example, the way extra time works is it is 30 minutes, 15 minutes with one time kicking the ball off, 15 minutes the other time kicking the ball off. So in that first 15 minute period, you take a player off each side, and instead of 11 on 11, you have 10 on 10. If the next 15 minutes you take another player off so it is now 9 on 9, and with the goalies, 8 on 8 in the field of play.
If it is still tied, you get to a 2nd extra time period, in the first 15 minutes you take off another guy, so now you are down to 8 on 8, no goes then the final extra time period you take another guy, now you are 7 on 7. Then at that point if no score only then do you resort to penalties or some other kind of tiebreaker.
The theory is that by taking 1 guy off the field for each team in 15 minute intervals that the field will open up and will make it way easier to score a goal with so much extra space.
People will say, "but that is not really futbol", however neither is deciding kicks by penalties, and deciding a game by reducing guys on each side to open up space is way closer to actual futbol than a penalty kick involving directly only 2 people, in a 1 on 1 matchup in a team game.
That is my personal favorite idea of how we could just about elimate deciding knockout games by penalties.
Another opton, that I think works almost as good, if instead of deciding it by penalties, which is a 1 on 1 interaction, make it a set piece and not a penalty.
Like yo upick 5 guys, but istead of penalties they do a set piece from say 2 or 3 feet outside the penalty box, so now at least you can have the other gus on the team make a wall, make it a tougher play, create more riveting suspense.
What do you think of these ideas broheem
M
member 3289
Guest
France 3 × 2 Uruguay
Brazil 3 x 1 Belgium
Can't fukn wait for tomorrow
Brazil 3 x 1 Belgium
Can't fukn wait for tomorrow
I think they're way too whacky and all over the place.
By the time the extra period of 30 minutes ends, everybody is already drained - physically and mentally. Whatever you do, it will not be good quality. so you would have a weird, low quality game of 7 vs. 7 guys and still no guarantee they will get to an outcome. I'm picturing tired guys running aimlessly, losing morale and missing ridiculous plays, people waiting for the game to end, and it remains a draw for an hour. it would be a nightmare for TV too.
the penalties shootout is not ideal but I don't have a problem with it tbh. by the time you get to it, the game is begging to be finished. it's exciting, thrilling and decisive and IMO there is no other solution.