General Splinty and other Anti-Vaxxers get in here

[member 1013]

@Splinty
N @Never_Rolled
@conor mcgregor nut hugger
@Lamont Cranston

@sparkuri
@Shinkicker
@Rambo John J

Fight!

The largest ever study has shown the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine is linked to lower rates of autism

The largest ever study has shown the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine is linked to lower rates of autism
Reuters

Lisa Rapaport


March 5, 2019 7:57 AM EST

Filed under:

• News
• World

Share this Story




The measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine isn’t associated with an increased risk of autism even among kids who are at high risk because they have a sibling with the disorder, a Danish study suggests.

 

[Never_Rolled]

Oh boy. This isn’t going to sit well with @theFLY~n~TACO .

 

[member 1013]

Oh boy. This isn’t going to sit well with @theFLY~n~TACO .

@theFLY~n~TACO

 

[member 1013]

I guarantee @Splinty bankrolled this “study” ( he is part of big pharma and makes YUGE profits off vaccines).

 

[Never_Rolled]

I guarantee @Splinty bankrolled this “study” ( he is part of big pharma and makes YUGE profits off vaccines).

I don’t see it any other way.

 

[Rambo John J]

 

[member 1013]

You tired?

Chronic fatigue maybe?

They’re working on a vaccine for that.

 

[Lamont Cranston]

I personally think that vaccines for children are an important health requirement that to deny them would be a disservice not only to the children but society in general.

That's my 5 cents.

 

[Never_Rolled]

You tired?

Chronic fatigue maybe?

They’re working on a vaccine for that.

My take on Rambo is he's basically a CTer but claims to be more of a "just askin questions" type. Harmless good guy though.

 

[Never_Rolled]

I personally think that vaccines for children are an important health requirement that to deny them would be a disservice not only to the children but society in general.

That's my 5 cents.

No shots, no school down here.

 

[Rambo John J]

My take on Rambo is he's basically a CTer but claims to be more of a "just askin questions" type. Harmless good guy though.

quite a generalization...issue to issue fella
and on this issue I know nothing

impossible to determine how much somebody believes in anything they post online....If you think you have that special power you will be often wrong.

 

[Rambo John J]

You tired?

Chronic fatigue maybe?

They’re working on a vaccine for that.

no thanks, I will pass
why not just bump the other thread not this topic?

are you going all karasu?
don't get all spinal bro

 

[Never_Rolled]

quiet a generalization...issue to issue fella
and on this issue I know nothing

Just my honest opinion from reading your posts. Think about it. Lar's wouldn't have tagged you if he didn't have that impression of you either. You might not even realize how you look to others. You believe what you believe right? Differing opinions make forums fun although this subject shouldn't have differing opinions and not saying you do or don't.

 

[member 1013]

no thanks, I will pass
why not just bump the other thread not this topic?

are you going all karasu?
don't get all spinal bro

I probably need a good adjustment

 

[SongExotic2]

Vaccines for dipshits

 

[Rambo John J]

Just my honest opinion from reading your posts. Think about it. Lar's wouldn't have tagged you if he didn't have that impression of you either. You might not even realize how you look to others. You believe what you believe right? Differing opinions make forums fun although this subject shouldn't have differing opinions and not saying you do or don't.

Lars likes to stir shit, it is his passion...I reckon he typed those names based almost solely upon the participation/ratings/and posts from the last vaxx thread...likley nothing more

I don't care if I am thought of as CT guy or asking questions guy(silly labels IMO)...I often am comfortable staying in the grey between black and white and that is fine with me...a lot of these topics are not exclusively right or wrong....besides all that how the hell do you get the CT guy label, who decides? Do you have to have a tattoo to make "the list"?...I got no problem with others believing what they want...free thought...free speech...all good with me.

I find it interesting you think you can you determine what exactly somebody believes and how much they believe it in the troll/deep troll era of the internet...I think you will often be wrong...some CTs I am trolling on and some I have interest in, past that I rarely am sold to an "side"

Again, I don't care about this topic much...sensitive topic for those who have had personal/family experiences with it.

I will withhold my opinion of you from reading your posts, and from out exchanges in the past

 

[Never_Rolled]

Fair enough...Lars likes to stir shit, it is his passion...I reckon he typed those names based almost solely upon the participation/ratings/and posts from the last vaxx thread...likley nothing more

I don't care if I am thought of as CT guy or asking questions guy...I often am comfortable staying in the grey between black and white and that is fine with me...a lot of these topics are not exclusively right or wrong...besides all that how the hell do you get the CT guy label, who decides? Do you have to have a tattoo to make "the list"?...I got no problem with others believing what they want...free thought...free speech...all good with me.

I find it interesting you think you can you determine what exactly somebody believes and how much they believe it in the troll/deep troll era of the internet...I think you will often be wrong...some CTs I am trolling on and some I have interest in, past that I rarely am sold to an "side"

Again, I don't care about this topic much...sensitive topic for those who have had personal/family experiences with it.

I will withhold my opinion of you from reading your posts, and from out exchanges in the past

Sure I don't know if your trolling or not. Either way I can only base my opinion on what you type right? You do gravitate to CT threads. You do comment on them. Your comments are usually opposite to what I believe. That's why you stand out to me. Not sure why you are being defensive. I am just pointing out how you have posted unless you think my observations aren't correct. I'm not arguing your opinion here BTW. You could also rightly state I have posted on CT threads and acted like an ass because I don't believe in most of them and I would agree with you. Bloodfist and I are more inline with our thoughts on CT.

Lets take you out of this. I found Pew Pew's thread at Taco Bell very interesting. So many people who are full blown CT'er's hate having that label and took issue with him on it. I found that really odd. If I believe or disbelieve in something I will fully own up to it. In my case I am an atheist. So what? I'm not on the fence or just asking questions. I just don't believe there is or was ever a god. It would be like not believing but being offended when someone called me an atheist. I don't get that whole thing. I assume people were put off having a label put on them?

 

[Rambo John J]

Sure I don't know if your trolling or not. Either way I can only base my opinion on what you type right? You do gravitate to CT threads. You do comment on them. Your comments are usually opposite to what I believe. That's why you stand out to me. Not sure why you are being defensive. I am just pointing out how you have posted unless you think my observations aren't correct. I'm not arguing your opinion here BTW. You could also rightly state I have posted on CT threads and acted like an ass because I don't believe in most of them and I would agree with you. Bloodfist and I are more inline with our thoughts on CT.

Lets take you out of this. I found Pew Pew's thread at Taco Bell very interesting. So many people who are full blown CT'er's hate having that label and took issue with him on it. I found that really odd. If I believe or disbelieve in something I will fully own up to it. In my case I am an atheist. So what? I'm not on the fence or just asking questions. I just don't believe there is or was ever a god. It would be like not believing but being offended when someone called me an atheist. I don't get that whole thing. I assume people were put off having a label put on them?

Not defensive to you as much as to the labelling and stereotyping(it is simply counterproductive to label in my experience)...I work on an individual basis for people and topics...I think people found the concept humorous and it turned into a long thread full of people both laughing at the concept and also some taking it very seriously, I laugh every time I read the thread title.

Spoiler: lots of words...TLDR

As for the "list" thread? lol total mess, and I can't get on the list for certain topics(cause they are deemed legit CTs) while the ones I am listed for I don't even have an solid fact/evidence based opinion on. Thread was about lumping folks together so they could be looked down upon by the superior intellect...silly on premise alone, and most folks seemed to be laughing at the concept of it

Spoiler

I am just telling you, I don't believe in everything about a topic just because I post in a thread...some topics I tend to view as more credible, and some are pretty far out and my instincts tell me are misinformed. I do like a CT thread, because it is a lot more interesting than Fake news or politics(I rarely even post in political threads because they are an excersize in divide and conquer). I think most people like those threads/discussions for one reason or another. Honest truth is I don't know for sure on so many issues so I remain the "asking questions" type, if asking questions is a bad thing then humanity is in a bad place I reckon.

I do act like an ass/troll to those who I view as thought police(In the past I have enjoyed the triggering, mostly on grindr), that is likely part of what has helped you form your opinion. My posts here are not the same as my posts there(hard to not get sucked into the "shit" over there)
I will do a 1-10 rating on how credible I consider certain CTs anyday...that would show how strongly I do, or don't believe in certain topics...I just find generalizations and labels to be rather worthless in most discussions.

 

[theFLY~n~TACO]

Never said vaccines are not good...never.

 

[Shinkicker]

I personally think that vaccines for children are an important health requirement that to deny them would be a disservice not only to the children but society in general.

That's my 5 cents.

I agree.


Except Guardisil. I'm not sold on that one yet.

The newer vaccines that even have doctors questioning the method of research, and the vaccine is optional, I'm fine with my kids not getting those.

 

[member 1013]

Guys

Please fight more

Thx

 

[Never_Rolled]

Never said vaccines are not good...never.

Was it one vaccine than you didn't like? I thought you wrote your sisters kid got sick if I remember correctly?

 

[Never_Rolled]

Not defensive to you as much as to the labelling and stereotyping(it is simply counterproductive to label in my experience)...I work on an individual basis for people and topics...I think people found the concept humorous and it turned into a long thread full of people both laughing at the concept and also some taking it very seriously, I laugh every time I read the thread title.

As for the "list" thread? lol total mess, and I can't get on the list for certain topics(cause they are deemed legit CTs) while the ones I am listed for I don't even have an solid fact/evidence based opinion on. Thread was about lumping folks together so they could be looked down upon by the superior intellect...silly on premise alone, and most folks seemed to be laughing at the concept of it

Spoiler

I am just telling you, I don't believe in everything about a topic just because I post in a thread...some topics I tend to view as more credible, and some are pretty far out and my instincts tell me are misinformed. I do like a CT thread, because it is a lot more interesting than Fake news or politics(I rarely even post in political threads because they are an excursive in divide and conquer). I think most people like those threads/discussions for one reason or another. Honest truth is I don't know for sure on so many issues so I remain the "asking questions" type, if asking questions is a bad thing then humanity is in a bad place I reckon.

I do act like an ass/troll to those who I view as thought police(In the past I have enjoyed the triggering, mostly on grindr), that is likely part of what has helped you form your opinion. My posts here are not the same as my posts there(hard to not get sucked into the "shit" over there)
I will do a 1-10 rating on how credible I consider certain CTs anyday...that would show how strongly I do, or don't believe in certain topics...I just find generalizations and labels to be rather worthless in most discussions.

On the same token Lar's lumped me in with the anti's and I am perfectly OK with that label. I just don't find an internet label offensive. I can only speak for me but if I put something out there many times over, others are going to form an opinion. That's on me not them. I assume we look at this differently and once again that's OK too.

I wouldn't make a very good troll in the sense of pretending to have views to which I don't really believe to get a rise out of people. I have enough haters with my real views so I'm good.

 

[theFLY~n~TACO]

After my Nephew went full completely normal to becoming 100% autistic after a round of immunizations...I've done homework on both sides of the fence. Reseach showing that babies are meant to develop their own immunity from birth as their systems come into contact with more than a million bacteria proteins during and shortly after birth...while mom passes on some immunity, it is often short lived compared with the baby’s own generated immunity. So that being said...every baby should be good to go.

Also research showing that within certain ingredients of certain vaccines...in no way a baby should be administered that many with that amount of doses of said certain ingredients because their bodies cannot withstand it at that age.

I will stay clear of this thread, as it breaks my heart all over again just to talk about it. Noah went from literally the happiest 1 year old baby...to fucking Frankenstein over night. I have done my research. I have formed my opinion on what I believe are facts to me. I witnessed it...I lived it. I didn't just point a finger from what I heard.


I did research.

 

[Rambo John J]

On the same token Lar's lumped me in with the anti's and I am perfectly OK with that label. I just don't find an internet label offensive. I can only speak for me but if I put something out there many times over, others are going to form an opinion. That's on me not them. I assume we look at this differently and once again that's OK too.

I wouldn't make a very good troll in the sense of pretending to have views to which I don't really believe to get a rise out of people. I have enough haters with my real views so I'm good.

I get that.
Ironically this thread is similar to the PP thread...except I think this one was made in jest and the other may have been a bit more serious.

I personally am skeptical that all vaccines are safe, I think most or a high percentage are safe and some are absolutely necessary.
I have done very little research so I don't look down on any opinions on the topic, and I don't pretend to be an authority on the subject in any way.
History has some cases/ examples of Mis-used/abused STD vaccines so it is natural to be skeptical IMO...most of the confirmed fuckery with vaccines has been in the past(decades ago) so I can't tell if it is currently going on.

I don't have the question of vaccines for my loved ones in my immediate future so I choose to be respectful of both sides of the issue/debate.
Only thing I have to consider is a Flu shot and probably not even that for a quite a few more years.