General Corona virus updates

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up
M

member 603

Guest
Your'e such a dork trooll. Go enjoy your Sunday baiting someone else.

Nothing's changed...I've got the documents...days ago...


You show me that he first went up his chain of command with no response, I will change my mind. To date, that's the official position and facts so far. With that as the background, you have to remove him if you're his boss.

As above...

Splinty @Splinty vs @conor mcgregor nut hugger.... The fight we didn't know we needed in the time of Coronavirus
 
M

member 3289

Guest
Ship captains are fired for less all the time. There is essentially a zero tolerance policy for almost any incident, be it major or minor. That's just how the Navy rolls. The Captain knew that.
It came down to saving lives vs. saving his career. He understood that.

I'm not sure why you, Splinty, and the U.S. Navy can't.
 

ThatOneDude

Commander in @Chief, Dick Army
First 100
Jan 14, 2015
35,390
34,114
Don't be a fucking moron, those places have higher population centers, and are cleaner than those white trash trailer park backwoods incest riddled hillbilly states in this disgusting morbidly obese diabetes filled country we live in.
That's pretty racist and hate filled. Take a chill pill bruh.
 
M

member 1013

Guest
He's 4 inches taller than me, weighs 100lbs more and carries it all in his 38 inch waist (low center of gravity), and will make you wish for unconsciousness the longer you are around him.

I don't stand a chance.
Want me to give him the Hebrew hammer dad?
 
M

member 3289

Guest
Nothing's changed...I've got the documents...days ago...


You show me that he first went up his chain of command with no response, I will change my mind. To date, that's the official position and facts so far. With that as the background, you have to remove him if you're his boss.

As above...
The Navy is saying he didn't report the issue. Of course they're saying that. It wouldn't look good for them if they admitted that the captain reported the issue and nothing was done about it on their end, would it?

As for documents, I don't think I'll have any. You don't either. You have a statement from the Navy. Well hopefully we get a statement from the fired captain after he gets his honorable (inshallah) discharge.

Why do you always toe the military line, even when it's not your branch?
 

ThatOneDude

Commander in @Chief, Dick Army
First 100
Jan 14, 2015
35,390
34,114
The Navy is saying he didn't report the issue. Of course they're saying that. It wouldn't look good for them if they admitted that the captain reported the issue and nothing was done about it on their end, would it?

As for documents, I don't think I'll have any. You don't either. You have a statement from the Navy. Well hopefully we get a statement from the fired captain after he gets his honorable (inshallah) discharge.

Why do you always toe the military line, even when it's not your branch?
He has too.
 

Splinty

Shake 'em off
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
44,116
89,900
As for documents, I don't think I'll have any
I was making a reference to my post above that is days old showing my position is unchanged. That's what you accused me of. As I said, I haven't. And as I said, you were wrong.

Why do you always toe the military line, even when it's not your branch?
One, I shut my mouth when I disagree and use appropriate chains for my disagreements. So you don't hear my other opinions. But we aren't talking about that so stop side stepping and deflecting. Stop shitting up this thread trying to make this personal if you can't stay on the subject.
 

ThatOneDude

Commander in @Chief, Dick Army
First 100
Jan 14, 2015
35,390
34,114
I was making a reference to my post above that is days old showing my position is unchanged. That's what you accused me of. As I said, I haven't. And as I said, you were wrong.



One, I shut my mouth when I disagree and use appropriate chains for my disagreements. So you don't hear my other opinions. But we aren't talking about that so stop side stepping and deflecting. Stop shitting up this thread trying to make this personal if you can't stay on the subject.
Splinty @Splinty, the honorable Mr. @conor mcgregor nut hugger, please hug and make up, don't fight. It makes me sad on the inside.
 

Chief

4070 = Legend
First 100
Jan 14, 2015
10,571
18,267
@conor mcgregor nut hugger I like you bro, and I'm not trying to wind you up. I just want to say that the fact that we are talking about this is the real problem. That ship is a large percentage of our fleet. Something broke down on both sides for this to become public.

The Navy is well prepared for this. We routinely run drills on CBR warfare (Chemical Biological and Radiological) and the sailors know how to protect from this. What should have happened is that ship should have been relieved, decontaminated and re-staffed. I don't know the logistics of our global campaigns that prevented that, but there are very important people who do.

Could he have handled it better? Probably. Could the chain of command have been more prompt in aid or conveying their positions or reasoning? Definitely.

I'm just saying relieving a Captain of command is not a big deal.
 

ThatOneDude

Commander in @Chief, Dick Army
First 100
Jan 14, 2015
35,390
34,114
Also relevant to this discussion, the Navy along with their ships are gay. Imagine taking an Uber and then having to wash the car, stock the guys house, fuck his wife in their basement, etc etc etc. All on the way to your destination.
 

Rambo John J

Baker Team
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
73,973
73,475
@conor mcgregor nut hugger I like you bro, and I'm not trying to wind you up. I just want to say that the fact that we are talking about this is the real problem. That ship is a large percentage of our fleet. Something broke down on both sides for this to become public.

The Navy is well prepared for this. We routinely run drills on CBR warfare (Chemical Biological and Radiological) and the sailors know how to protect from this. What should have happened is that ship should have been relieved, decontaminated and re-staffed. I don't know the logistics of our global campaigns that prevented that, but there are very important people who do.

Could he have handled it better? Probably. Could the chain of command have been more prompt in aid or conveying their positions or reasoning? Definitely.

I'm just saying relieving a Captain of command is not a big deal.
no logic please
 

Splinty

Shake 'em off
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
44,116
89,900
The Navy is saying he didn't report the issue. Of course they're saying that. It wouldn't look good for them if they admitted that the captain reported the issue and nothing was done about it on their end, would it?
If it turns out that is true, as I said, I will change my mind and he shouldn't be removed. Then he's being held accountable just for a leak (assuming he didn't leak it).

The content of his letter is in no way an issue in my opinion, though some in the NYT article anonymously states they thought it was "panic" inducing. The biggest issue is what to do with someone that very publicly goes outside the chain of command. If you do that, you force your bosses hand to move you because the chain is weakened for others taking orders all the way down. This is a core tenant of military hierarchy. I've been on joint bases deployed with Navy. Their line between officers and enlisted is HUGE compared the Army. And even in the Army such a move could easily get someone removed. In the Navy officer stuff stays officer stuff...period.

I understand that much of thew news is making this out to be a decision about whether the Navy or the Captain care about the sailors. But that is only a part of this. There exists a scenario in which the Captain has valid concerns but has gone about it very wrong. At the minimum that appears to be what happened and even in that situation many times that Captain gets removed. The politics on top of this should not exist unless those politics are why he was removed.
 
M

member 3289

Guest
@conor mcgregor nut hugger I like you bro, and I'm not trying to wind you up. I just want to say that the fact that we are talking about this is the real problem. That ship is a large percentage of our fleet. Something broke down on both sides for this to become public.

The Navy is well prepared for this. We routinely run drills on CBR warfare (Chemical Biological and Radiological) and the sailors know how to protect from this. What should have happened is that ship should have been relieved, decontaminated and re-staffed. I don't know the logistics of our global campaigns that prevented that, but there are very important people who do.

Could he have handled it better? Probably. Could the chain of command have been more prompt in aid or conveying their positions or reasoning? Definitely.

I'm just saying relieving a Captain of command is not a big deal.
In the beginning I, like Splinty @Splinty, supported the firing of the captain. But then I asked my ex-NAVY cousin about it bc I saw on social media that he was supporting the guy.

I only brought it up today because I read that the captain had tested positive for COVID-19.

I'm usually pro-military, but this one seems like the chain of command is just trying to cover its ass.
 

Splinty

Shake 'em off
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
44,116
89,900
I'm usually pro-military, but this one seems like the chain of command is just trying to cover its ass.
You don't have to be pro or anti military to discuss this. This isn't a conversation that has to lead to that team sport positioning.

I once helped shoot 20,000+ rounds into the dark ostensibly under the auspices of "night time weapons familiarization".

That make sense until you realize:
Too many rounds were ordered. It was night time without tracer rounds or NVG. The range wasn't running so now targets. Someone would have to inventory those sensitive items if they weren't all shot by the end of the weekend.

It doesn't take too much to realize we were just wasting this stuff because someone wanted to be a little lazy.
 

Rambo John J

Baker Team
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
73,973
73,475
You don't have to be pro or anti military to discuss this. This isn't a conversation that has to lead to that team sport positioning.

I once helped shoot 20,000+ rounds into the dark ostensibly under the auspices of "night time weapons familiarization".

That make sense until you realize:
Too many rounds were ordered. It was night time without tracer rounds or NVG. The range wasn't running so now targets. Someone would have to inventory those sensitive items if they weren't all shot by the end of the weekend.

It doesn't take too much to realize we were just wasting this stuff because someone wanted to be a little lazy.
what did you use to shoot the rounds?

hopefully one of these things attached to a hummer

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zsf38NYzo5Q