General Electile Dysfunction: an election that lasts longer than 4 days is a serious medical problem

  • Thread starter Deleted member 1
  • Start date
Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up
T

The Big Guy

Guest
This one is iffy
I dont mean that cause it's from 4chan.
I say that cause it looks like a 15 year old
Theres a video but I won't post it

1603768174529.png
 
Freeloading Rusty

Freeloading Rusty

Here comes Rover, sniffin’ at your ass
Jan 11, 2016
26,916
26,589
Inside Job said:
Agreed
He said the right things, turned out to be a complete liar and fraud sadly

I got duped badly
Click to expand...
Duped in 2008
Wrong on 2012
Inactive in 2016
And duped again in 2020

What did he promise first term that you identified with that he failed to deliver?
 
Rambo John J

Rambo John J

Baker Team
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
75,453
74,581
Splinty said:
" Rambo John J @Inside Job here's a bag of crack, 10 million dollars, and a dozen hookers from three countries."




You're taking no photos? a few?
No, thousands. Thousands is the answer.
Click to expand...
I don't like the camera despite my handsome looks, so likely zero pics

Never done white drugs but I guess I would probably try and hookers sound fun for sure
 
D

Deleted member 1

Guest
Inside Job said:
I don't like the camera despite my handsome looks, so likely zero pics

Never done white drugs but I guess I would probably try and hookers sound fun for sure
Click to expand...
Haven't you been paying attention? You arent gifted like hunter the horse either.

Thousands.
 
D

Deleted member 1

Guest
Inside Job said:
lockdowns
Click to expand...
we are trying to avoid and should be last resort
Variations on the theme (large crowd banning for example) will be required until vaccine in regional increases

Inside Job said:
testing
Click to expand...
the primary thing to fund ASAP and lower barriers and costs. This is how you avoid the above.

Inside Job said:
masks
Click to expand...
A currently cheap stop gap that should be mandated just like seat belts
Masks will end their own usefulness with decreased case doubling/severity as testing is brought to levels it should already be. Again testing. Period.
 
Rambo John J

Rambo John J

Baker Team
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
75,453
74,581
Splinty said:
we are trying to avoid and should be last resort
Variations on the theme (large crowd banning for example) will be required until vaccine


the primary thing to fund ASAP and lower barriers and costs. This is how you avoid the above.



A currently cheap stop gap that should be mandated just like seat belts
Masks will end their own usefulness with decreased case doubling/severity as testing is brought to levels it should already be. Again testing. Period.
Click to expand...
You sir, would not get my vote with that policy or stance.

I choose freedom over perceived safety.
 
Rambo John J

Rambo John J

Baker Team
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
75,453
74,581
Splinty said:
All the seatbelt arguments rehashed. I get it. But it doesn't change the facts.
Click to expand...
I respect your stance and input

I disagree about that being the best course of action

Covid restriction pandering swayed my voting is all I am saying

We live in different states that are handling this very different ways, so it is hard for us to compare the situations IMO
 
T

The Big Guy

Guest
There a whole video of Biden with this webcam hooker. It's pretty nasty. I dont recommend a watch
1603770426823.png
 
D

Deleted member 1

Guest
Inside Job said:
We live in different states that are handling this very different ways, so it is hard for us to compare the situations IMO
Click to expand...

It's not.

The right answer is dynamic but always goes back to testing, resources, and case doubling and case density.

A.
You don't have enough testing.
You should be wearing masks in public in nearly all of your counties.

B.
There's a little reason to lock down in the sense of closing many establishments in many of your counties. Your cases and doubling time are relatively low. they're also smaller and more rural areas which tend to double slower up front. But you have less resources and overwhelm them easily.

The problem with B is that while numbers in many of your counties allow you to open back up right now and I think you should, current lack of testing will put you in a position of growth in cases and subsequent resource usage.

Because you don't have enough testing as you open back up you will be forced to mask to slow and then add restrictions.
If you have enough testing you could avoid those restrictions indefinitely. If you had even more, your cases would likely become low enough that masking was not a cost effective intervention.

If you don't know who is sick, you're stuck with rudimentary source control.
 
D

Deleted member 1

Guest
I can count to TCity said:
There a whole video of Biden with this webcam hooker. It's pretty nasty. I dont recommend a watch
View attachment 18770
Click to expand...

Hunter Biden sat around naked smoking crack online. This is the same behavior stated in text message before about being sexually inappropriate. That's the actual description.

Standing by for the "torture" and rape of little kids that has been promised.
 
Rambo John J

Rambo John J

Baker Team
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
75,453
74,581
Splinty said:
It's not.

The right answer is dynamic but always goes back to testing, resources, and case doubling and case density.

A.
You don't have enough testing.
You should be wearing masks in public in nearly all of your counties.

B.
There's a little reason to lock down in the sense of closing many establishments in many of your counties. Your cases and doubling time are relatively low. they're also smaller and more rural areas which tend to double slower up front. But you have less resources and overwhelm them easily.

The problem with B is that while numbers in many of your counties allow you to open back up right now and I think you should, current lack of testing will put you in a position of growth in cases and subsequent resource usage.

Because you don't have enough testing as you open back up you will be forced to mask to slow and then add restrictions.
If you have enough testing you could avoid those restrictions indefinitely. If you had even more, your cases would likely become low enough that masking was not a cost effective intervention.

If you don't know who is sick, you're stuck with rudimentary source control.
Click to expand...
I appreciate the post but I disagree

I would prefer it to be exactly as it was a year ago to date and then let us see how bad it is before any mandates or restrictions at all
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom