General Electile Dysfunction: an election that lasts longer than 4 days is a serious medical problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 1
  • Start date Start date
This one is iffy
I dont mean that cause it's from 4chan.
I say that cause it looks like a 15 year old
Theres a video but I won't post it

1603768174529.png
 
Splinty said:
" @Inside Job here's a bag of crack, 10 million dollars, and a dozen hookers from three countries."




You're taking no photos? a few?
No, thousands. Thousands is the answer.
Click to expand...
I don't like the camera despite my handsome looks, so likely zero pics

Never done white drugs but I guess I would probably try and hookers sound fun for sure
 
Inside Job said:
I don't like the camera despite my handsome looks, so likely zero pics

Never done white drugs but I guess I would probably try and hookers sound fun for sure
Click to expand...

Haven't you been paying attention? You arent gifted like hunter the horse either.

Thousands.
 
Inside Job said:
lockdowns
Click to expand...
we are trying to avoid and should be last resort
Variations on the theme (large crowd banning for example) will be required until vaccine in regional increases

Inside Job said:
testing
Click to expand...
the primary thing to fund ASAP and lower barriers and costs. This is how you avoid the above.

Inside Job said:
masks
Click to expand...

A currently cheap stop gap that should be mandated just like seat belts
Masks will end their own usefulness with decreased case doubling/severity as testing is brought to levels it should already be. Again testing. Period.
 
Splinty said:
we are trying to avoid and should be last resort
Variations on the theme (large crowd banning for example) will be required until vaccine


the primary thing to fund ASAP and lower barriers and costs. This is how you avoid the above.



A currently cheap stop gap that should be mandated just like seat belts
Masks will end their own usefulness with decreased case doubling/severity as testing is brought to levels it should already be. Again testing. Period.
Click to expand...
You sir, would not get my vote with that policy or stance.

I choose freedom over perceived safety.
 
Splinty said:
All the seatbelt arguments rehashed. I get it. But it doesn't change the facts.
Click to expand...
I respect your stance and input

I disagree about that being the best course of action

Covid restriction pandering swayed my voting is all I am saying

We live in different states that are handling this very different ways, so it is hard for us to compare the situations IMO
 
There a whole video of Biden with this webcam hooker. It's pretty nasty. I dont recommend a watch
1603770426823.png
 
Inside Job said:
We live in different states that are handling this very different ways, so it is hard for us to compare the situations IMO
Click to expand...


It's not.

The right answer is dynamic but always goes back to testing, resources, and case doubling and case density.

A.
You don't have enough testing.
You should be wearing masks in public in nearly all of your counties.

B.
There's a little reason to lock down in the sense of closing many establishments in many of your counties. Your cases and doubling time are relatively low. they're also smaller and more rural areas which tend to double slower up front. But you have less resources and overwhelm them easily.

The problem with B is that while numbers in many of your counties allow you to open back up right now and I think you should, current lack of testing will put you in a position of growth in cases and subsequent resource usage.

Because you don't have enough testing as you open back up you will be forced to mask to slow and then add restrictions.
If you have enough testing you could avoid those restrictions indefinitely. If you had even more, your cases would likely become low enough that masking was not a cost effective intervention.

If you don't know who is sick, you're stuck with rudimentary source control.
 
I can count to TCity said:
There a whole video of Biden with this webcam hooker. It's pretty nasty. I dont recommend a watch
View attachment 18770
Click to expand...


Hunter Biden sat around naked smoking crack online. This is the same behavior stated in text message before about being sexually inappropriate. That's the actual description.

Standing by for the "torture" and rape of little kids that has been promised.
 
Splinty said:
It's not.

The right answer is dynamic but always goes back to testing, resources, and case doubling and case density.

A.
You don't have enough testing.
You should be wearing masks in public in nearly all of your counties.

B.
There's a little reason to lock down in the sense of closing many establishments in many of your counties. Your cases and doubling time are relatively low. they're also smaller and more rural areas which tend to double slower up front. But you have less resources and overwhelm them easily.

The problem with B is that while numbers in many of your counties allow you to open back up right now and I think you should, current lack of testing will put you in a position of growth in cases and subsequent resource usage.

Because you don't have enough testing as you open back up you will be forced to mask to slow and then add restrictions.
If you have enough testing you could avoid those restrictions indefinitely. If you had even more, your cases would likely become low enough that masking was not a cost effective intervention.

If you don't know who is sick, you're stuck with rudimentary source control.
Click to expand...
I appreciate the post but I disagree

I would prefer it to be exactly as it was a year ago to date and then let us see how bad it is before any mandates or restrictions at all
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top