Holy shit. Trump actually hired someone who isn't a complete retard.@Thor Georgeos
okay you were right. This is good with me
View: https://twitter.com/HopeSeck/status/1326979737022046208
What do you think @ThatOneDude ?
Holy shit. Trump actually hired someone who isn't a complete retard.
"Why do we need the marines?"
"Because you need them for amphibious landings"
"Ok, we've got this thing coming up at Normandy. Kind of a big amphibious landing. Should we use them?"
"Nah, don't need them. In fact we're pretty sure the best troops for this landing will be the Canadian military and they don't even have a marine corps"
"Umm. So, what are we going to do? Just keep them around as a separate branch of the military for another 80 years for no fucking reason?"
"Hurr Durr Semper Fi!"
"The Marine Corps is the Navy's police force and as long as I am President that is what it will remain. They have a propaganda machine that is almost equal to Stalin's"
- President Truman
A Marine probably fucked his wife or gf.
Holy shit. Trump actually hired someone who isn't a complete retard.
"Why do we need the marines?"
"Because you need them for amphibious landings"
"Ok, we've got this thing coming up at Normandy. Kind of a big amphibious landing. Should we use them?"
"Nah, don't need them. In fact we're pretty sure the best troops for this landing will be the Canadian military and they don't even have a marine corps"
"Umm. So, what are we going to do? Just keep them around as a separate branch of the military for another 80 years for no fucking reason?"
"Hurr Durr Semper Fi!"
"The Marine Corps is the Navy's police force and as long as I am President that is what it will remain. They have a propaganda machine that is almost equal to Stalin's"
- President Truman
We are better trained, just look at Fallujah for the most recent example.at the end of the day somebody more educated than me would have to explain why the Marines exist as a separate branch instead of a specialized force simply under another branch. Then again I'm just some dummy that doesn't understand why we spend so much money with separate duty uniform camouflage (hey look that's going away slowly but surely).
I'm not sure I would go as far as propaganda given that they are better trained for combat than either the general Navy or Army under which they would be merged in any removal of branch.
But I do remember reading a long time ago about a Marine corps leader (general?) that justified the Marine corps with "America doesn't need a Marine corps, America wants a Marine corps".
Canadians are the best soldiers. Like aussies but calmer.Holy shit. Trump actually hired someone who isn't a complete retard.
"Why do we need the marines?"
"Because you need them for amphibious landings"
"Ok, we've got this thing coming up at Normandy. Kind of a big amphibious landing. Should we use them?"
"Nah, don't need them. In fact we're pretty sure the best troops for this landing will be the Canadian military and they don't even have a marine corps"
"Umm. So, what are we going to do? Just keep them around as a separate branch of the military for another 80 years for no fucking reason?"
"Hurr Durr Semper Fi!"
"The Marine Corps is the Navy's police force and as long as I am President that is what it will remain. They have a propaganda machine that is almost equal to Stalin's"
- President Truman
Canadian soldiers are da bestat the end of the day somebody more educated than me would have to explain why the Marines exist as a separate branch instead of a specialized force simply under another branch. Then again I'm just some dummy that doesn't understand why we spend so much money with separate duty uniform camouflage (hey look that's going away slowly but surely).
I'm not sure I would go as far as propaganda given that they are better trained for combat than either the general Navy or Army under which they would be merged in any removal of branch.
But I do remember reading a long time ago about a Marine corps leader (general?) that justified the Marine corps with "America doesn't need a Marine corps, America wants a Marine corps".
Member when it took 10,000 marines with superior kit to do what 2600 Canadian infantry men did in AfghanistanWe are better trained, just look at Fallujah for the most recent example.
Member when it took 10,000 marines with superior kit to do what 2600 Canadian infantry men did in Afghanistan
Nato members
The secret appears to be training year-round with an underfunded military and ancient equipment as a handicap. And then at the last minute switch it all out for American bells and whistles.Member when it took 10,000 marines with superior kit to do what 2600 Canadian infantry men did in Afghanistan
Nato members
That was just ammunitionThe secret appears to be training year-round with an underfunded military and ancient equipment as a handicap. And then at the last minute switch it all out for American bells and whistles.
Sniper records members.
I mean, it fucked shit up but I was like an off brand knock offThis statement offends me
Was it made by GyyyyyyNUH?I mean, it fucked shit up but I was like an off brand knock off
i am surprised we arent still using the lee enfieild .303That was just ammunition
we were still using our shitty 50 caliber gun
Doc, with respect, that quote is fucking retarded, not profound. The issue isn't having a part of the military that is designed to perform some of the specialised functions of the current marine corp, it's having a separate 'marine' branch that performs many functions that have nothing to do with those original purposes and which could easily be subsumed into the traditional branches. If the marine corp has better trainers and troop standards, you can just use those trainers and set higher standards in the army and navy.at the end of the day somebody more educated than me would have to explain why the Marines exist as a separate branch instead of a specialized force simply under another branch. Then again I'm just some dummy that doesn't understand why we spend so much money with separate duty uniform camouflage (hey look that's going away slowly but surely).
I'm not sure I would go as far as propaganda given that they are better trained for combat than either the general Navy or Army under which they would be merged in any removal of branch.
But I do remember reading a long time ago about a Marine corps leader (general?) that justified the Marine corps with "America doesn't need a Marine corps, America wants a Marine corps".
Record sniper shot was with a Canadian rifle. Deal with it.The secret appears to be training year-round with an underfunded military and ancient equipment as a handicap. And then at the last minute switch it all out for American bells and whistles.
Sniper records members.
Did you know the marines have their own compliment of fighter jets? So do state level national guards.Doc, with respect, that quote is fucking retarded, not profound. The issue isn't having a part of the military that is designed to perform some of the specialised functions of the current marine corp, it's having a separate 'marine' branch that performs many functions that have nothing to do with those original purposes and which could easily be subsumed into the traditional branches. If the marine corp has better trainers and troop standards, you can just use those trainers and set higher standards in the army and navy.
There are far more efficient and productive ways to do jobs programs.
We also have our own Uber service, we are very advanced.Did you know the marines have their own compliment of fighter jets? So do state level national guards.
I like fighter jets
Nah just primers.Jesus Christ this thread has gone all over the place, can we please get it back on topic?
@ThatOneDude are you having a tough time finding powder?