Yes I did.
And for anyone following along:
Pfizer board member Scott Gottlieb confirms U.S. turned down offer for more vaccine doses
This is straight executive failure. I mean, there are things that you just blame on the machine or is really unpredictable that you can't hold the boss accountable. But "should we stock pile extra vaccines while we can or should we gamble that there will be a better vaccine in the future so lets not do that" is a straight up failed executive decision. The cost there would have been 10-19 bucks according to a quick google. So we went in for 50 million = 500-1000 million. But then we decided not to be in for 1500-2000 million. But what's the trade off? Waiting for more not yet made vaccines hoping they will be there and that they would save more money than that???
Should we gamble one billion on a shotgun approach guaranteeing 150million vaccines up front? Downfall if the whole vaccine can't be out you are now out 2000 million instead of 1000 milllion.But you aren't going to save on the next vaccines almost assuredly.
We need to inoculate about half that population to slow this thing to a crawl.
Now we have to manage multiple vaccines with different supply chain requirements to make up the gap.
Even at our clinic and hospital level, that is hard to do because of the inefficiency of ordering, storing, etc.