M
Ben or Don?He can be a total asshat of a human.
Those points all check out.
We can hope so!whats next ? they gonna remove his library card and cancel his amazon prime?
Lol the boomer questionI've been following this 8kun fan in a turtle neck through the accounts.
View: https://twitter.com/pttrn_ntgrty/status/1346962839060140033
View: https://twitter.com/SaraGentzler/status/1346952476893696008
the gingercaust cant come fast enoughI've been following this 8kun fan in a turtle neck through the accounts.
View: https://twitter.com/pttrn_ntgrty/status/1346962839060140033
View: https://twitter.com/SaraGentzler/status/1346952476893696008
Fuck that lying cocksucker hes loves this
Section 230 says that "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider" (47 U.S.C. § 230). In other words, online intermediaries that host or republish speech are protected against a range of laws that might otherwise be used to hold them legally responsible for what others say and do. The protected intermediaries include not only regular Internet Service Providers (ISPs), but also a range of "interactive computer service providers," including basically any online service that publishes third-party content. Though there are important exceptions for certain criminal and intellectual property-based claims, CDA 230 creates a broad protection that has allowed innovation and free speech online to flourish.
This legal and policy framework has allowed for YouTube and Vimeo users to upload their own videos, Amazon and Yelp to offer countless user reviews, craigslist to host classified ads, and Facebook and Twitter to offer social networking to hundreds of millions of Internet users. Given the sheer size of user-generated websites (for example, Facebook alone has more than 1 billion users, and YouTube users upload 100 hours of video every minute), it would be infeasible for online intermediaries to prevent objectionable content from cropping up on their site. Rather than face potential liability for their users' actions, most would likely not host any user content at all or would need to protect themselves by being actively engaged in censoring what we say, what we see, and what we do online. In short, CDA 230 is perhaps the most influential law to protect the kind of innovation that has allowed the Internet to thrive since 1996.
CDA 230 also offers its legal shield to bloggers who act as intermediaries by hosting comments on their blogs. Under the law, bloggers are not liable for comments left by readers, the work of guest bloggers, tips sent via email, or information received through RSS feeds. This legal protection can still hold even if a blogger is aware of the objectionable content or makes editorial judgments.
the gingercaust cant come fast enough
that is where this is headedHe's making sure my ar-15s get banned.
And really, who can blame average America?that is where this is headed