General Corona virus updates

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up

Filthy

Iowa Wrestling Champion
Jun 28, 2016
27,507
29,835
People in Ottawa are under a stay at home order and you claim to know someone coming and going frequently who is not being bound by the same rules that Canadian citizens are, a person who also has no reason to be here. When it's pointed out to you that your friend doesn't need to be here, you get mad instead of explaining why what they're doing can't possibly be sent here through any method other than hand delivery.
why don't they need to be there? they live in Ottawa.

expertise doesn't get boxed up, and some problems require an expert to go to the problem because the problem can't come to the expert.
Some people, their job is being the expert. So....still not sure what point you're trying to make.

other than refusing to acknowledge that you're wrong about the person and the situation.
 

BeardOfKnowledge

The Most Consistent Motherfucker You Know
Jul 22, 2015
60,549
56,270
why don't they need to be there? they live in Ottawa.
When someone who lives in Arizona says they have a colleague that travels in and out of Canada frequently, most people would not assume Ottawa is their place of residence hence my confusion

expertise doesn't get boxed up, and some problems require an expert to go to the problem because the problem can't come to the expert.
What is he going back and forth for specifically?

other than refusing to acknowledge that you're wrong about the person and the situation.
As usual you don't provide any details and then act surprised when people can't read your thoughts.
 

Filthy

Iowa Wrestling Champion
Jun 28, 2016
27,507
29,835
When someone who lives in Arizona says they have a colleague that travels in and out of Canada frequently, most people would not assume Ottawa is their place of residence hence my confusion



What is he going back and forth for specifically?



As usual you don't provide any details and then act surprised when people can't read your thoughts.
so...you made an incorrect assumption.

no problem. and like I said, it's a DND obligation. That's all I'll say on it, and that's probably more than is necessary to understand the situation.
 

ThatOneDude

Commander in @Chief, Dick Army
First 100
Jan 14, 2015
35,390
34,272

Shinkicker

For what it's worth
Jan 30, 2016
10,318
13,924
Is that proven?
I just thought there was a lack of evidence to date.
The vaccine stimulates the inner antibodies (IgG) in muscle and blood. It does not stimulate IgA, the antibodies covering the outer areas, mouth, nose, throat, etc, which is where transmission happens. That's why the vaccine claim is it's 95% effective in preventing COVID-19 the disease, no mention of preventing the virus.

I personally don't think it keeps you from getting the virus. But I always assume the worst until proven otherwise.
 
M

member 3289

Guest
California is stopping moderna vaccinations due to some bad reactions to this completely experimental vaccine

Probably a good thing you guys aren't getting that BS
There you go again spouting nonsense. California never stopped Moderna vaccines entirely, only one batch that they later resumed using:


Posts like the one I've quoted are the reason admins no longer respond to you.
 

Filthy

Iowa Wrestling Champion
Jun 28, 2016
27,507
29,835
Is that proven?
I just thought there was a lack of evidence to date.
this bugs me from a science guy. there's no evidence that it stops transmission, there's not even a hypothesis of HOW it would stop transmission.

therefore, it doesn't stop transmission. because science.

;)

EDIT: oops - just read Shinkicker @Shinkicker 's comment, didn't mean to pile on.
 

Splinty

Shake 'em off
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
44,116
91,096
this bugs me from a science guy. there's no evidence that it stops transmission

You're in a thread saying it doesn't. Point blank.

The correct statement is "there isn't data to support it."
And I'd at "yet".

Most vaccines result in a deceased transmission level and it seems strange to be so confident on something actively pending.


there's not even a hypothesis of HOW it would stop transmission.
That's not true. There are dozens of studies on this exact topic pending right now.
Israelis suggest they see a deceased viral shed which may reduce or stop transmission in their initial role out.
 

Splinty

Shake 'em off
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
44,116
91,096
The vaccine stimulates the inner antibodies (IgG) in muscle and blood. It does not stimulate IgA, the antibodies covering the outer areas, mouth, nose, throat, etc, which is where transmission happens.

This is a misunderstanding that humoral immunity is the only mechanism here that would prevent transmission.
If all we become is blank surfaces and no longer shed replicated virus, you will see a significant decrease in transmission. IgA or not.



That's why the vaccine claim is it's 95% effective in preventing COVID-19 the disease, no mention of preventing the virus.

The claims are 95% covid19 prevention because that's what the study was powered for. It was studied to evaluate if individuals develop COVID-19 clinically and if they develop antibodies. Now they are doing transmission studies.

They all mention transmission on every single website. Everyone "we don't know yet". They have not had the powered study done yet. They are currently occurring for every manufacturer.
 

Filthy

Iowa Wrestling Champion
Jun 28, 2016
27,507
29,835
You're in a thread saying it doesn't. Point blank.

The correct statement is "there isn't data to support it."
And I'd at "yet".

Most vaccines result in a deceased transmission level and it seems strange to be so confident on something actively pending.




That's not true. There are dozens of studies on this exact topic pending right now.
Israelis suggest they see a deceased viral shed which may reduce or stop transmission in their initial role out.
the correct position is "it doesn't" until someone proves that it does. Or at least publishes research for review.

that's the source of my 'confidence' - not that it's not possible/rational/likely, but I'm confident that there's no data to support making any change to public policy or recommended behaviors, and I think that confidence is well-grounded in Scientific Process and Precautionary Principle.

Because that's the context this always comes up in: "Let's XYZ because there's a vaccine now"
 

ShatsBassoon

Throwing bombs & banging moms
First 100
Jan 14, 2015
18,555
33,607
So Trudeau cancels flights to sun destinations, risking the collapse of canadian airlines. Meanwhile flights to and from other destinations, such as China and Dubai remain open.
Now forced isolation regardless of test results when returning to canada. $2000 at your own expense mind you. Then 14 day quarantine at home, while 3rd party security contractors (I imagine that's on us tax payers dime) check up on you daily.
This timeline licks bag.

20210131_092846.jpg
 
Last edited:

Filthy

Iowa Wrestling Champion
Jun 28, 2016
27,507
29,835
So Trudeau cancels flights to sum destinations, risking the collapse of canadian airlines. Meanwhile flights to and from other destinations, such as China and Dubai remain open.
Now forced isolation regardless of test results when returning to canada. $2000 at your own expense mind you. Then 14 day quarantine at home, while 3rd party security contractors (I imagine that's on us tax payers dime) check up on you daily.
This timeline licks bag.

View attachment 26701
it's just a gross violation of human rights.
and it's going to do economic murder.
 

ShatsBassoon

Throwing bombs & banging moms
First 100
Jan 14, 2015
18,555
33,607

ThatOneDude

Commander in @Chief, Dick Army
First 100
Jan 14, 2015
35,390
34,272
The vaccine stimulates the inner antibodies (IgG) in muscle and blood. It does not stimulate IgA, the antibodies covering the outer areas, mouth, nose, throat, etc, which is where transmission happens. That's why the vaccine claim is it's 95% effective in preventing COVID-19 the disease, no mention of preventing the virus.

I personally don't think it keeps you from getting the virus. But I always assume the worst until proven otherwise.
My wife tested negative 3 weeks in a row after being in close contact for multiple weeks with covid positive people.

Just 1 data point but interesting.