General Corona virus updates

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up

Splinty

Shake 'em off
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
44,116
89,905
Would you say hes helped make one of the greatest contributions to human history?
I would say that when the documentary is made on his presidency if it turns out that he had a critical decision-making capacity that allowed the vaccines to move forward in a way they would have not done so otherwise then he should have absolutely given credit.
Otherwise it's a team effort and the whole team deserves the applause.
 
T

The Big Guy

Guest
I would say that when the documentary is made on his presidency if it turns out that he had a critical decision-making capacity that allowed the vaccines to move forward in a way they would have not done so otherwise then he should have absolutely given credit.
Otherwise it's a team effort and the whole team deserves the applause.
You sneaky son of a gun. Now you are trying to take a slice of the orange mans pie for yourself
 

Filthy

Iowa Wrestling Champion
Jun 28, 2016
27,507
29,633
I would say that when the documentary is made on his presidency if it turns out that he had a critical decision-making capacity that allowed the vaccines to move forward in a way they would have not done so otherwise then he should have absolutely given credit.
Otherwise it's a team effort and the whole team deserves the applause.
if he had the opportunity to remove regulatory roadblocks and did not do so, would he be culpable in deaths?
 

Splinty

Shake 'em off
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
44,116
89,905
if he had the opportunity to remove regulatory roadblocks and did not do so, would he be culpable in deaths?
I think it would depend on the context. Was the concern safety? Then no I wouldn't hold him culpable for that. Was the concern political? Then yeah.
 

Filthy

Iowa Wrestling Champion
Jun 28, 2016
27,507
29,633
I think it would depend on the context. Was the concern safety? Then no I wouldn't hold him culpable for that. Was the concern political? Then yeah.
he was on record at the time with the "little flu" that "magically disappears" when the vaccine was first available...what evidence of safety over political priorities would trump that public knowledge?
 

Splinty

Shake 'em off
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
44,116
89,905
he was on record at the time with the "little flu" that "magically disappears" when the vaccine was first available...what evidence of safety over political priorities would trump that public knowledge?

Nothing. But I've mostly been talking about the vaccine dev and trying to credit where it's due.
Trump downplayed the entire pandemic trying to walk both sides of the line the entire time.
 

Freeloading Rusty

Here comes Rover, sniffin’ at your ass
Jan 11, 2016
26,916
26,589
W
I'm so excited.
Now we can specifically talk about our experiences with the jab, our families, our cities, our states, our countries, and the entire sphere.

For studies, rumors, positives & negatives, findings, YOUTUBE VIDEOS, bitchute, Rumble, Brighteon, and a whole bunch of publications that won't exist in a year.

We can talk VAERS, its history, Eudraviligence, tie in the history of vax courts, the CDC, special interest groups, liabilities, scientific studies, understanding control groups, understanding terminology, censorship & deletions, and all the wonderful things we're in for together in the near future.




Let's get this party started.
Why is it most of the posters who are anti COVID reality & claim it is all about control or division are the ones who post most about COVID/vaccines/comments aimed at demonizing one side?

Does that mean they got you too?
 

Freeloading Rusty

Here comes Rover, sniffin’ at your ass
Jan 11, 2016
26,916
26,589

Yet Ted Cruz doesn’t tell you his kids go to a private school with a mask mandate. Why does he pay for his kids to go to a school with a mask mandate but encourages you not to support mask mandates?
 
Last edited:

Freeloading Rusty

Here comes Rover, sniffin’ at your ass
Jan 11, 2016
26,916
26,589
Rand Paul discloses 16 months late that his wife bought stock in company behind covid treatment
The disclosure, in a filing with the Senate, came 16 months after the 45-day reporting deadline set forth in the Stock Act, which is designed to combat insider trading.
Experts in corporate and securities law said the investment, and especially the delayed reporting of it, undermined trust in government and raised questions about whether the Kentucky Republican’s family had sought to profit from nonpublic information about the looming health emergency and plans by the U.S. government to combat it. Several senators sold large amounts of stocks in January or February of last year, prompting a handful of insider-trading probes. Most of those investigations concluded in the spring of 2020, according to notifications from the Justice Department to lawmakers under scrutiny.

“The senator ought to have an explanation for the trade and, more importantly, why it took him almost a year and a half to discover it from his wife,” said James D. Cox, a professor of law at Duke University.