Alright, let's drag through this.
I come across a clip from 9(?) months ago.
The Pfizer head is stating his sense of urgency non-existent regarding an injection; it's repeated in a loop.
I post it on an MMA non-topic coronavirus thread to highlight to viewers the sense of urgency(*this is sarcastic dear readers, there is no sense of urgency readers, this is sarcastic*) not present.
Next I get a Spanish inquisition equivalent.
What "informing" does this beg that hasn't been hashed over for a year and a half?
Context??
Am I expected(or anyone) to link a sworn statement, affidavit, end user agreement, certificate of understanding...to every post?
Are participants of this thread expected to deliver more clarification of possible obfuscation per post than the head a Pfizer, or anyone delivering the confusion of this plandemic?
Seriously, what am I owing you or anyone else per post that hasn't been tilled to death over the last 18 months?
You want context?
OK, here's context:
FULL DESCRIPTION:
*Hi folks, this is a video clip that some retard made on a loop 6 months ago highlighting the head of the "vaccine" company delivering your injection, of his "humanity" and good will on full display, by way of intention despite his position to stand in line like the rest of humanity for his obedience injection*
Am I getting close, or just being a dick?
I feel like I'm being a dick, cuz I'm a little perplexed on why this thread requires infinitely more background & walk-through than a mountain bike thread 3 doors down.
Am I held to a higher responsibility than the vaccine company because I chose to participate here?
I feel like this thread carries the responsibility level of nurturing a kid through a breakup.
Well shit, I guess 10,000 pages wasn't enough.
You seriously want to talk about this "virus", I am all ears.
Let's waste another day as I swim upstream against our brainwashers.
Like seriously, my posts at this point here are Calvin & Hobbs-level sarcastic, because I already posted 1,000 studies a year ago covering WHAT I THOUGHT was all that was necessary to make studied decisions.
Totally regretting it.
When I read this thread, and the stated expectations of each response, it's unreal to me.
I am expected to read each post for environment's sake, but responders expect re-iteration of previous sentiment to avoid contextual misunderstanding.
