I think the angry elf dipshit should have final say. Or even baldie bird watcher.Honestly, I have no idea. Just figured you leaned left after the comment you made about people who disagreed with me politically being given unfair treatment. If that were the case @Leigh would most certainly be gone.
New jersey imoI always found him to just have a very New York sense of humor.
Free the cunt.
He is the only member here I give myself a chance of beating in a fight.
Funny you should mention doxxing, at least one of the people that reported CMNH was involved in the attempted but failed doxxing of him.I dunno. I get both sides of the argument. If you let someone get under your skin, online, that says more about you than it does the offender.
I also get that moderating this site is probably a pain in the ass. It's a forum not a daycare right?
That being said, perhaps there should be some definitive rules that are completely transparent.
Doxxing= instant ban
Say ******* = instant ban
Suggest @Splinty is actually a quack and promotes healing crystals and essential oils = perma ban
It's hard not to see the landscape of the moderation on this site an not be able to say some posters get a little more leash than others.
It is a community afterall and for the most part we have been self moderating.
To sum it all up, Nut hugger was a cunt but he was our cunt. He was a habitual line stepper but he was also an integral part of the fabric of this community.
Also it takes a special kind of sissy bed wetter to use the report function. Grow up and fight your own battles.
*end of incoherent rant.
Signed
ReportedI dunno. I get both sides of the argument. If you let someone get under your skin, online, that says more about you than it does the offender.
I also get that moderating this site is probably a pain in the ass. It's a forum not a daycare right?
That being said, perhaps there should be some definitive rules that are completely transparent.
Doxxing= instant ban
Say ******* = instant ban
Suggest @Splinty is actually a quack and promotes healing crystals and essential oils = perma ban
It's hard not to see the landscape of the moderation on this site an not be able to say some posters get a little more leash than others.
It is a community afterall and for the most part we have been self moderating.
To sum it all up, Nut hugger was a cunt but he was our cunt. He was a habitual line stepper but he was also an integral part of the fabric of this community.
Also it takes a special kind of sissy bed wetter to use the report function. Grow up and fight your own battles.
*end of incoherent rant.
Signed
no biggie doe! - @modsFunny you should mention doxxing, at least one of the people that reported CMNH was involved in the attempted but failed doxxing of him.
lol he sent all ur infos 2 meChmn is one of the few people here that knows my personal email, name, PayPal.
I've never been worried of him doxxing me.
Chmn is one of the few people here that knows my personal email, name, PayPal.
I've never been worried of him doxxing me.
He's given half the site his personal info.Chmn is one of the few people here that knows my personal email, name, PayPal.
I've never been worried of him doxxing me.
member when i gave you my info and you reported the battle axe to canada border services?He's given half the site his personal info.
He thought highly of you, I assured him Ur a cunt but he just wouldn't listen. I reckon you two sexed or something.I’ve never hated anyone online as much as CMNH when he signed up. That lasted for about a year I think. Then I stopped taking myself and the forum so seriously and we got along. Not my call and I doubt this thread will change anything but but fuck it, signed.
Some people here are stupid and won't unastan what you said. I'd consider rewording it.Imo rather than a ban, I think what we could use is a 2 way ignore system. The current ignore system only allows you to not see someone else's posts, but it they can see yours, they still can comment on you, react etc. If there were a two way ban system, people who wanted less of a particular user in their forum diet could opt out without being subjected to abuse or interaction from the same user. Tagging or quoting that user would also be disabled. It's effectively a restraining order.
Banning on behalf of "the community" is a useful tactic, but overwhelmingly it's been the same types of disputes causing flare ups and the argument style of both sets of actors is always to claim innocence or self defense. It's difficult to post here unless you have a particular sense of humor and some people are just less talented at back and forth than others. I wonder if it the future @Splinty will be able to plug a sentiment analysis algorithm into the forum that monitors users who have had interactions that led to reports or blocks and ask the user if they're sure they want to make that post or require pre-approval for it from a mod. This seems more nimble than the banhammer, which overwhelmingly seems to skew in a particular political direction.
As if American politics doesn't affect the whole world, and the West hegemony even more so.You don’t even live in America, zeph. So why are you so invested in its politics?
Please rainbow this and call me a right wing racist bigot before responding, so we maintain some sort of normalcy here.
Thanks in advance.
i love when americans ask their vassals why we follow their politics lolAs if American politics doesn't affect the whole world, and the West hegemony even more so.
UK is pretty much a vassal state theses days. So exactly why wouldn't I have an interest in US politics?
You've got 2 different parties in the US, the Democratic Party a centre right wing majority with a small centre left contingent, and the Republican Party a far right wing majority with a small centre right contingent.
The views that got you banned from Twitter multiple times plant you firmly with the majority of the Republican party on the far right.