Those seem like some legitimate sources.
Liz Cheney's loss.So much fraud
Get used to it
I have felt the books were cooked since 2000
and I wasn't even 25 years of age during that "election"
Tell me you don't know anything about Wyoming without telling me you don't know anything about Wyoming.The libs know they can't steal an election in a state with such low population as blindly as they did in the president election of 2020.
So they sat this one out and finally we got to see a free and fair election between a pro Trump politician and a anti Trump politic.
Wind RiverTell me you don't know anything about Wyoming without telling me you don't know anything about Wyoming.
UFC 6Tell me you don't know anything about Wyoming without telling me you don't know anything about Wyoming.
Largest turn out for a midterm primary in Wyoming history. The people there hated her that much. So much that they turned out in record numbers and overwhelmed the system. No amount of fraud was going to save Cheney out there.Liz Cheney's loss.
Explain.
ExactlyLargest turn out for a midterm primary in Wyoming history. The people there hated her that much. So much that they turned out in record numbers and overwhelmed the system. No amount of fraud was going to save Cheney out there.
I agree that's what happened. But it flies in the face of election fixing. She was the establishment's savior and they chose not to interfere and protect Wyoming royalty? Doesn't jive, that's one of the best examples of an election you'd want to rig.Largest turn out for a midterm primary in Wyoming history. The people there hated her that much. So much that they turned out in record numbers and overwhelmed the system. No amount of fraud was going to save Cheney out there.
I think in situations like this, where the voters overwhelm the system, it's impossible for them to pull off the amount of fraud necessary or it would be too easily identified. Also, more people are volunteering to be poll observers, monitoring drop boxes, True The Vote is geo-tracking, etc. It isn't as easy as it was 2 years ago. Not saying they wont try and it wont happen, but they'll have to be selective and come up with new strategies.I agree that's what happened. But it flies in the face of election fixing. She was the establishment's savior and they chose not to interfere and protect Wyoming royalty? Doesn't jive, that's one of the best examples of an election you'd want to rig.
A place like Wyoming where no one lives and the Cheney's own everything is the perfect place to pull a fast one, sir.I think in situations like this, where the voters overwhelm the system, it's impossible for them to pull off the amount of fraud necessary or it would be too easily identified. Also, more people are volunteering to be poll observers, monitoring drop boxes, True The Vote is geo-tracking, etc. It isn't as easy as it was 2 years ago. Not saying they wont try and it wont happen, but they'll have to be selective and come up with new strategies.
especially in an election year where "every seat counts"A place like Wyoming where no one lives and the Cheney's own everything is the perfect place to pull a fast one, sir.
Margin against her was too large. Don’t think they could have pulled it off without it being easy to detect and expose. Just my 2 cents.A place like Wyoming where no one lives and the Cheney's own everything is the perfect place to pull a fast one, sir.
could Trump or a Trump-backed candidate lose a close election where fraud wasn't the deciding factor?Margin against her was too large. Don’t think they could have pulled it off without it being easy to detect and expose. Just my 2 cents.
Either way, it’s been 53 yrs since a Bush, Clinton, Cheney, or Obama didn’t hold some sort of office. America should celebrate those legacies being ended.
Probably not. Just kidding. Of course, Trump backed candidates can lose. Some have. Was fraud a factor? Who knows. I tend to believe its a lot more prevalent than any of us can imagine, and its been going on longer than we can imagine as well. Forget Trump...I just want election integrity cleaned up so we all know for certain that our votes count.could Trump or a Trump-backed candidate lose a close election where fraud wasn't the deciding factor?
what would it take to convince you that elections are adequately "clean"?Probably not. Just kidding. Of course, Trump backed candidates can lose. Some have. Was fraud a factor? Who knows. I tend to believe its a lot more prevalent than any of us can imagine, and its been going on longer than we can imagine as well. Forget Trump...I just want election integrity cleaned up so we all know for certain that our votes count.
This^Margin against her was too large. Don’t think they could have pulled it off without it being easy to detect and expose. Just my 2 cents.
Either way, it’s been 53 yrs since a Bush, Clinton, Cheney, or Obama didn’t hold some sort of office. America should celebrate those legacies being ended.
I'd need more than 5 minutes while watching First 48, to think about that...but off the top of my head: In person voting on election day, paper ballots only, hand counted (no machines), results announced by midnight of election day, mail in ballots limited to military only, voter rolls cleaned up in every state.what would it take to convince you that elections are adequately "clean"?
what's adequate look like?
i think "hand counted ballots" and "results announced by midnight of election day" are diametrically opposed goals.I'd need more than 5 minutes while watching First 48, to think about that...but off the top of my head: In person voting on election day, paper ballots only, hand counted (no machines), results announced by midnight of election day, mail in ballots limited to military only, voter rolls cleaned up in every state.