he agreed to a debate, despite his temporary speech impediment.LoL @ 53 year old Lurch being protected...
View: https://twitter.com/NRSC_Rapid/status/1567166684607221762
View: https://twitter.com/FearTheFloof/status/1567267677466501122
careful, your bias is showing.This is Biden's White House monkeypox coordinator, Demetre Daskalakis. No, I'm not making this up.
View attachment 77715
Herd we gohe agreed to a debate, despite his temporary speech impediment.
He's crushing Dilbo Carpetbaggins.
View: https://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/watch/john-fetterman-agrees-to-debate-dr-oz-in-pennsylvania-senate-race-147997765808
Do you think chasing after innocent black men with a shotgun should be disqualifying ?he agreed to a debate, despite his temporary speech impediment.
He's crushing Dilbo Carpetbaggins.
View: https://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/watch/john-fetterman-agrees-to-debate-dr-oz-in-pennsylvania-senate-race-147997765808
is that what happened?Do you think chasing after innocent black men with a shotgun should be disqualifying ?
Heard gunshots in an alleyis that what happened?
he saw a black man and chased him down with a shotgun?
LoL.
the guy he stopped also said that he thought it was gunshots until he looked up and saw fireworks.Heard gunshots in an alley
Got in his truck that already had a shotgun in it. Drove up on a black man , got out of the truck and pointed the gun at him. Called the cops and held him at gun point. Man was completely innocent. Turns out it was someone setting off fireworks.
oh and Fetterman was the Mayor
He claims he didn’t point the gun
View: https://youtu.be/_cZ4x12Mb40
Just to be clear thenthe guy he stopped also said that he thought it was gunshots until he looked up and saw fireworks.
but considering that the guy didn't file a complaint, it happened once in a split-second decision, and that Fetterman wasn't convicted of a felony, no.
It's absolutely not disqualifying.
You can't trash Uvalde police for doing nothing AND trash Fetterman for doing something. He didn't harm anyone, and I didn't see any indication that the race of the individual was a factor in his decision. It's a real stretch to call Fetterman a racist over this situation.
Also can’t bash police for not doing their job, unless I’m ok with a man randomly picking another and holding at gun point?the guy he stopped also said that he thought it was gunshots until he looked up and saw fireworks.
but considering that the guy didn't file a complaint, it happened once in a split-second decision, and that Fetterman wasn't convicted of a felony, no.
It's absolutely not disqualifying.
You can't trash Uvalde police for doing nothing AND trash Fetterman for doing something. He didn't harm anyone, and I didn't see any indication that the race of the individual was a factor in his decision. It's a real stretch to call Fetterman a racist over this situation.
but the parents who tried to get in to the school, same-same?Also can’t bash police for not doing their job, unless I’m ok with a man randomly picking another and holding at gun point?
One was the police
The other wasn’t
no. the assault started before they fired.Just to be clear then
The guys in Georgia who murdered that guy were cool until they fired?
LOL at comparing kids being murdered in real time and holding up an unarmed random dude.but the parents who tried to get in to the school, same-same?
he wasn't a random unarmed dude. He was a guy seen fleeing the sound of "gunfire".LOL at comparing kids being murdered in real time and holding up an unarmed random dude.
If the parents grabbed guns and ran into the wrong school I’d definitely call them morons and say they shouldn’t be in congress.
I disagreehe wasn't a random unarmed dude. He was a guy seen fleeing the sound of "gunfire".
He was accosted, but didn't feel inconvenienced enough to file a complaint.
it's a long reach to say he's not fit to represent his constituents. If the parents had charged in with guns and killed the guy, we'd be calling them heroes. They'd probably be charged with felonies and disqualified from holding office.
But none of that happened here. It might disqualify Fetterman from an individual's vote, but it's not a pattern of bad judgment or recklessness with firearms.
if the guy he accosted had filed a complaint, I'd feel differently.I disagree
I’m actually surprised your ok with using guns to intimidate and play vigilante.
But
He’ll likely win then vote to take away your guns.
But remember how that didn’t ever happen?@MMAHAWK
remember when Pres Trump said they should take away the guns first, and then due process later?
remember when Pres Trump banned bump-stocks by telling the BATFE to re-interpret their ruling?
I know who is a threat to liberty, and they're all from the same party.
But remember how that didn’t ever happen?
You see how these conversations are tough? But I gotta ask. If wrong decisions isn’t an indication.making the wrong decision isn't an indication of bad judgment.
Did he take a gun from a single person or just speak nonsense?
View: https://www.washingtonpost.com/video/politics/trump-take-the-guns-first-go-through-due-process-second/2018/02/28/4f767df6-1cec-11e8-98f5-ceecfa8741b6_video.html
Pres. Trump moves to ban gun ‘bump stocks’
WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he has directed his attorney general to propose changes that would ban so-called bump stocks, which make it easier to fire rounds more quickly. “Just a few moments ago I signed a memo directing the attorney general to propose regulations that ban awww.fox13now.com
repetition.You see how these conversations are tough? But I gotta ask. If wrong decisions isn’t an indication.
What’s an indication of bad judgement?
shouldn't speaking nonsense in a way that indicates a willingness to deprive people of basic human rights disqualify someone from being the head of Executive?Did he take a gun from a single person or just speak nonsense?