Society Let's talk New Jersey drones

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up
Shinkicker

Shinkicker

For what it's worth
Jan 30, 2016
10,445
13,911
luchalibre said:
I don't need to call them, I still have all the access they do plus a lot more. I've seen nothing shocking with this situation other than a lot of retarded people thinking a plane or helicopter is an alien spacecraft. I've lost a lot of faith in the intelligence of people if anything.
Click to expand...
So the establishment is telling people “we know about the Drones. Stop calling.”
Capable establishments are being told not to ‘engage’ the Drones.
Congress is calling witnesses to testify about Drones.
The FBI, CIA, and the DOD are conducting a briefing on Drones.


All of this based on people misidentifying planes? Can you tell me Who is retarded again?
 
L

luchalibre

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2024
649
576
Shinkicker said:
So the establishment is telling people “we know about the Drones. Stop calling.”
Capable establishments are being told not to ‘engage’ the Drones.
Congress is calling witnesses to testify about Drones.
The FBI, CIA, and the DOD are conducting a briefing on Drones.


All of this based on people misidentifying planes? Can you tell me Who is retarded again?
Click to expand...
When do you not engage? Typically when you're building out a network and discovering their TTPs and things like that. If your adversary has weakness you can exploit you don't tell them immediately and lose the ability to exploit. THAT would be retarded.
 
Shinkicker

Shinkicker

For what it's worth
Jan 30, 2016
10,445
13,911
A retarded “hobbyists” can fly a car-size drone around a city unchecked and no one knows what’s going on.

I don’t know but that even the EADS and a local drone expert doesn’t know what’s going on is even scarier.
 
Shinkicker

Shinkicker

For what it's worth
Jan 30, 2016
10,445
13,911
luchalibre said:
When do you not engage? Typically when you're building out a network and discovering their TTPs and things like that. If your adversary has weakness you can exploit you don't tell them immediately and lose the ability to exploit. THAT would be retarded.
Click to expand...
Are you saying this drone is a known adversary?
 
Shinkicker

Shinkicker

For what it's worth
Jan 30, 2016
10,445
13,911
Shinkicker said:
Btw, I don’t think It’s aliens. It’s China. Lol
Click to expand...
Seriously, here’s what I think is happening.

The establishment/some agency is flying these drones. They are getting everyone worked up over it. Then they will go to Congress and ask for millions and billions of dollars to investigate and formulate plans to counter any future adversary drones.

Congress will give them the money and we will feel safe again.

L @luchalibre , you are correct. We are mostly retarded.
 
C

CuddleBug

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2023
508
854
This thread has now devolved into discussions on it being the government, a foreign government, etc. Can we please get back to the sensible discussion of this being aliens?
 
Shinkicker

Shinkicker

For what it's worth
Jan 30, 2016
10,445
13,911
Jamie999 said:
Possibly.. They just caught a Chinese spy flying a drone over a military base or something... I'm guessing that might be what you're referencing.. So maybe.
Click to expand...
Oh really?! How convenient. We are going to need an extra 40 million for our drone defense plan then.



side note
The government must have been getting so pissed that people were thinking aliens and not China. lol
 
L

luchalibre

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2024
649
576
Shinkicker said:
Oh really?! How convenient. We are going to need an extra 40 million for our drone defense plan then.



side note
The government must have been getting so pissed that people were thinking aliens and not China. lol
Click to expand...
More like 4 trillion. Drones are big business. Hell 40 million won't even touch 1/2 a Triton
 
Mike Litoris

Mike Litoris

I identify as a 10er
Jan 25, 2020
106
273
I heard some reporter on the news saying how dangerous it was to try and shoot the drones out of the sky because bullets will come back down.

While that's true, wait until he finds out what shot guns are for.
 
L

luchalibre

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2024
649
576
Mike Litoris said:
I heard some reporter on the news saying how dangerous it was to try and shoot the drones out of the sky because bullets will come back down.

While that's true, wait until he finds out what shot guns are for.
Click to expand...
I mean it's more dangerous to shoot at them because it's a serious felony and you're gonna get raked over the coals. Some of the group 1 drones are 30k and sensors can go over 100k. You bet you ass people will press charges and sue the shit out of you if you shoot one. If you can see it, it can see you.
 
Shinkicker

Shinkicker

For what it's worth
Jan 30, 2016
10,445
13,911
State and local officials are now pressuring the federal government to take action as government agencies will lose their counter-drone authority without Federal Aviation Administration reauthorization from Congress.

Rep. Chris Smith, a New Jersey Republican and outspoken critic of the Biden administration's response to these sightings, told Fox News he plans to introduce legislation as early as this week that would allow state police to better handle the drone threats = including tracking the drones and taking them down.

He said he sees the bill as a 'very real extension of a capability that is needed right now' in US defense space.

'There's more vulnerability here that anyone wants to accept, but we need to take action - decisive action.'

Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, a Democrat from Illinois, also said Congress has to 'work in a bipartisan manner to plug some holes within the law in terms of who is allowed to operate drones, in what manner and how do you disable or deal with drones in improper airspace.'
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom