General Trump's Running Shit Like a Motherfuckin BOSSS

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up
MountainMedic

MountainMedic

Rock Kicker
Sep 28, 2017
4,840
9,939
Bungee up said:
I'm very glad to hear this.
I have high hope for him. I'm interested to see how hard he goes.
My expectations for tulsi aren't high . I just dont trust her. I'm not disappointed with her as a pick though.
Click to expand...
I don't really trust RFK, to be honest.
I just feel like a temper tantrum/rage quit is on the horizon for him. Then he'll spend the next few years trashing Trump and Musk.

Hope I'm wrong.

I think Tulsi will be OK, not incredible.

The appointment I'm most behind is Patel. He is absolutely the right man for the job.

Rubio will do exactly as he's told, so he's fine but wouldn't have been my first choice.

Bondi worries me a bit. She's an authoritarian on some issues including gun rights.

Hegseth has some baggage but he's a great pick for our time.

I'm not really familiar with Trumps other picks enough to have an opinion.
He made horrible choices last time, this lot has to be better, and more importantly they have to be on the same page as the President at all times. 4 years is a blink of the eye, and the dogfight for who's next is probably underway behind the scenes.. thats just how professional politicians act.
 
Wild

Wild

Zi Nazi
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
93,216
135,056
kvr28 said:
Yep, as soon as he doesn't get what he wants/going too slow, he is gonna bounce.
Click to expand...
I respectfully disagree. I think all of these picks are 100% pro-Trump, pro-America, and in it for the full term. I think they're all going to do a prenominal job helping restore this country to greatness.
 
C

CuddleBug

Posting Machine
Nov 18, 2023
679
1,201
Wild said:
I respectfully disagree. I think all of these picks are 100% pro-Trump, pro-America, and in it for the full term. I think they're all going to do a prenominal job helping restore this country to greatness.
Click to expand...
Unless they mean he gets push back from the Whitehouse, I don't see any cabinet members not getting their way because they will bulldoze and fire anyone who tries to stop them, the only part they can't account for is the court system.
 
B

Bungee up

Active Member
Jun 25, 2022
283
240
MountainMedic said:
I don't really trust RFK, to be honest.
I just feel like a temper tantrum/rage quit is on the horizon for him. Then he'll spend the next few years trashing Trump and Musk.

Hope I'm wrong.

I think Tulsi will be OK, not incredible.

The appointment I'm most behind is Patel. He is absolutely the right man for the job.

Rubio will do exactly as he's told, so he's fine but wouldn't have been my first choice.

Bondi worries me a bit. She's an authoritarian on some issues including gun rights.

Hegseth has some baggage but he's a great pick for our time.

I'm not really familiar with Trumps other picks enough to have an opinion.
He made horrible choices last time, this lot has to be better, and more importantly they have to be on the same page as the President at all times. 4 years is a blink of the eye, and the dogfight for who's next is probably underway behind the scenes.. thats just how professional politicians act.
Click to expand...
I agree with your assessment on all of them.
I think it's going to go one of 2 ways with RFK amd we're going to find out very quickly which way it's going to go. It'll either go like you said , or he'll be very quiet and not do a whole lot. Or he's going to go hard as fuck and shake the shit out of things.
After all the shit he's talked that is my expectation. Anything less and I'll consider him a bullshiter.
IMO Tulsi is far to persuade able at best and a mole on the government intelligence payroll at worst. My expectations for her arnt high.
People might think I'm crazy for saying that but I've found I'm pretty good at picking out people who work for the CIA/IA's.
It's very subtle and a combination of things but one of the things is they say stuff where it sounds like they are really giving the goods, saying things you shouldn't say. But when you really listen to it they are saying nothing people don't already know and letting the person they are talking to make the claims.
I could give little really subtle examples where she has caught herself in interviews but people probably wouldn't see what I'm seeing.
I'm a person who believes pretty much everyone in the public is a FED and the FED'S control both sides of the discussion. The internet isn't the place where you get the truth like so many believe. The FED's don't go to all this trouble to put out propaganda and forget to turn their attention to media pundits on the internet.
I think in a lot of cases these people don't even know they are being influenced by the FED's.
I can only think of less than 5 names who I think aren't that are name people would know.
That probably sounds like a silly claim but I made it years ago and wholeheartedly am sticking to it.
Independent YouTube media is going to be our version of what cable news is for boomers.
Sorry for the FRAT post.
All that said, I'm not disappointed with his picks..... yet.
 
S

supersonic

Posting Machine
Sep 4, 2015
804
1,073
Bungee up said:
I agree with your assessment on all of them.
I think it's going to go one of 2 ways with RFK amd we're going to find out very quickly which way it's going to go. It'll either go like you said , or he'll be very quiet and not do a whole lot. Or he's going to go hard as fuck and shake the shit out of things.
After all the shit he's talked that is my expectation. Anything less and I'll consider him a bullshiter.
IMO Tulsi is far to persuade able at best and a mole on the government intelligence payroll at worst. My expectations for her arnt high.
People might think I'm crazy for saying that but I've found I'm pretty good at picking out people who work for the CIA/IA's.
It's very subtle and a combination of things but one of the things is they say stuff where it sounds like they are really giving the goods, saying things you shouldn't say. But when you really listen to it they are saying nothing people don't already know and letting the person they are talking to make the claims.
I could give little really subtle examples where she has caught herself in interviews but people probably wouldn't see what I'm seeing.
I'm a person who believes pretty much everyone in the public is a FED and the FED'S control both sides of the discussion. The internet isn't the place where you get the truth like so many believe. The FED's don't go to all this trouble to put out propaganda and forget to turn their attention to media pundits on the internet.
I think in a lot of cases these people don't even know they are being influenced by the FED's.
I can only think of less than 5 names who I think aren't that are name people would know.
That probably sounds like a silly claim but I made it years ago and wholeheartedly am sticking to it.
Independent YouTube media is going to be our version of what cable news is for boomers.
Sorry for the FRAT post.
All that said, I'm not disappointed with his picks..... yet.
Click to expand...
Great post
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom