also, I know you're a Rand guy (respect), why did Trump try so hard to get Rand out of the race first? then, after he dropped to focus on the senate, why did Trump continue to slam him & try to help Rand lose his senate seat? if anyone followed, it was like Gray & Trump were colluding (doubt it, but Gray sure capitalized on it)
I would think an anti-establishment candidate would be behind someone like Rand Paul.
I agree with all that.
My thoughts are, that leading into the convention, the meetings that he had with the RNC powerhouse went something like,
"the establishment is unbeatable, play ball 50%, or we have no problem keeping the establishment going, even if it's Hillary."
My fear would be a false flag on Trump in some attempt to cultivate massive civil unrest putting Pence in the oval office. I would put nothing past them.
And Trump, personally, is not my cup of tea.
BUT, despite all of that, he still holds firm to the things I care about most, which are establishing relations with Russia that keep an acceptable power balance, and keeps my face from melting off.
Both parties' warhawks seem dead set on villainizing Russia.
I know there will be massive voter fraud, am 99% sure my vote doesn't count, but I see Hillary and I see WW3 and/or a massive push toward UN control over our states, constitution, and overall globalization.
And interestingly, many Mises institute contributors have seemingly positioned themselves behind Trump in an effort to further public awareness of libertarian values.
I'm HOPING, that once the Don is in office, there will be a revived awakening toward these values that could never be accomplished by the lack of showmanship of the Paul's and others in a country that is blinded by pageantry.
Either way, anything is better than Hillary Clinton.
This Trump movement might be the springboard for a louder, more powerful voice by 3rd party candidates in the future.