Good. Has any of that shit worked out well for us? Ever?
Hate to look like I'm defending Trump and I know you weren't addressing me but I read that Boeing recovered most or all of its losses (related to the Trump tweet and subsequent statement) later in the day.@IschKabibble
Boeing is your biggest exporter and a huge company, I read his tweet had em lose 1+billion equity. How many US-jobs could that potentially cost down the line?
Good. Has any of that shit worked out well for us? Ever?
Good. Has any of that shit worked out well for us? Ever?
Yeah, but its not as if nothing happened, and it shows how influential such a tweet can be, he tweeted cancel order, is that breaking a contract? Is it broken already? Will it be broken? Interesting in any case.Hate to look like I'm defending Trump and I know you weren't addressing me but I read that Boeing recovered most or all of its losses (related to the Trump tweet and subsequent statement) later in the day.
Hate to look like I'm defending Trump and I know you weren't addressing me but I read that Boeing recovered most or all of its losses (related to the Trump tweet and subsequent statement) later in the day.
and you can't even say its a negotiating tactic.
Yeah but fuck those Airbus commies amirite?The current aeronautics approoriations process for the military is wrought with abuse and industry wide price fixing. The current process is no longer an X prize bidding, but rather an across the board refusal to risk any private money, moving to full public risk.
In this process, as is seen with the failure of the F-35 creation, the manufacturer gets a down payment on a vision. Nothing proven, nothing risked. Missed targets and increased funding needs are accepted as sunk opportunity costs are chased father and farther down the timeline. It is too costly and too time consuming to back up and start with proper path.
The airforce one program has ballooned in projected costs of 4 billion while Boeing hides this with a focus on the down payment. That's what they design fee is. The process refused to stop once 150+ million is spent.
The other issue in the background is that as Boeing looks to upgrade add ons for two new 747, the entire line is expected to be ending. You will be in the same position as the space shuttle, creating highly expensive and rare customized parts to maintain mission capability. That's a weakness.
There is currently zero public accountability in this process.
Just like the F-35, here we go again...
So one of the first things your "America first" prez will be doing is breaking a contract with one of your biggest companies and shaking em down / damaging em by using public pressure?It's a negotiating tactic
What are you reading? The stock reacted (by no means did it "tank" as was reported) by dropping a couple bucks. For a $150/share stock, that's hardly an issue. It recovered most of that by the end of the day, then on Tuesday it finished higher than it was when he sent out the tweet. It's in the green today by $0.32/share.I read his tweet had em lose 1+billion equity. How many US-jobs could that potentially cost down the line?
Yeah, I was more shocked at the current contract to BA that pays them $170 million to DESIGN the interior of the plane. Fucking insane.In this process, as is seen with the failure of the F-35 creation, the manufacturer gets a down payment on a vision.
will be doing is breaking a contract
Yeah but fuck those Airbus commies amirite?
but using the same logic he has EARNED them $160 million today alone at the time of this post.
"Noch bevor die US-Börse am Dienstag eröffnete, brach die Boeing-Aktie aufgrund des Trump-Tweets um fast zwei Dollar ein, ein zeitweiser Marktwertverlust von 1,2 Milliarden Dollar."What are you reading? The stock reacted (by no means did it "tank" as was reported) by dropping a couple bucks. For a $150/share stock, that's hardly an issue. It recovered most of that by the end of the day, then on Tuesday it finished higher than it was when he sent out the tweet. It's in the green today by $0.32/share.
While I agree he should keep some of this stuff off of twitter, this incident had zero impact on intelligent shareholders - let alone $1 billion.
They are using fuzzy math to say his tweet lost them $1 billion, but using the same logic he has EARNED them $160 million today alone at the time of this post.
Mike Pence was quoted talking about a contract.You're the only one saying this. Theres no contract. There is a broken appropriations process as I described above. He is showing his willingness to not get stuck in a sunk cost fallacy where you just need a little more, a little more...
Mike Pence was quoted talking about a contract.
And what you describe is what you wish to have him showing by that. He could show that in a room where they are actually talking to each other - like reputable businessmen.