Can you explain why it was justifiable?I train LE and armed security on Shoot-No shoot situations just like this. It was 100% justifiable. It was also 100% avoidable. All the guy had to do was stop with his buddies & put his hands up.
Can you explain why it was justifiable?I train LE and armed security on Shoot-No shoot situations just like this. It was 100% justifiable. It was also 100% avoidable. All the guy had to do was stop with his buddies & put his hands up.
From what it seems like at the moment, is that if they suspect you have a gun, and you aren't complying and have hands where they can't see them, then the police can shoot you. To me that is shocking. To not even have to see a weapon, let alone have it pointed at you, and they can shoot you.Can you explain why it was justifiable?
That would not be justifiable IMHO. Maybe in the eyes of the law but not morally.From what it seems like at the moment, is that if they suspect you have a gun, and you aren't complying and have hands where they can't see them, then the police can shoot you. To me that is shocking. To not even have to see a weapon, let alone have it pointed at you, and they can shoot you.
did the cops know about his facebook comment at the time of the shooting, or is it like the robbery before the michael brown shooting, in which they had no clue?As I read more about the case I found that Mr. Taylor had warrants for his arrest, and posted this on Facebook a few days before the shooting. Taylor wrote "I feel my time is coming soon, my nightmears are telling me. im gonna have warrants out for my arrest soon ... ill die before I go do a lot of time in a cell."
I wish I could shoot fuckers that didn't listen to me. NO NAMESWhat i don't understand is why didn't the Cop use a stun gun, beanbag gun or another nonlethal weapon? And if i was a cop and i absolutely had to shot someone it would be in the legs. Anyways the guy wasn't listening and he suffered the consequences. Cops these days don't fuck around.
But not at all costs this is really sounding like SBCSo that justifies the cop shooting him instead of physically handling him? I mean cops are trained to control suspects correct?
Their cowards, that's the issueWhat I want to know is, is it something in their training that makes certain cops feel lethally threatened, or is more psychological screening needed to weed out the rigid, wrathful types, or is it that profiling frames some men as both menacing and disposable, or that untreated mental illness, which affects both cops and civilians, is endemic and contributes to fatal miscommunication? Or is it some hideous fucking depressing tangle of all this and more besides that makes you want to quit Earth?
Jesus.
Cops aren't trained to shoot at limbs. Like the military, they are trained to shoot center mass. If the guy wasn't a fucking idiot he would still be alive.I have to agree.
Stop
Put your hands up slow
Don't keep walking
BUT shoot the guy in the leg or some shit.
There are bad cops just like there are bad (insert profession). Most departments have rigorous vetting processes, which include psychological testing and polygraph, to weed out the bad apples. Even so some get through. The profession is an incredibly dangerous one. Being in danger for prolonged periods of time can cause adverse reactions in behavior. I'm not making excuses for bad behavior, but when you see the worst society has to offer (men raping women, people beating infants to death, drunk driving fatalities) it tends to color ones perspective.What I want to know is, is it something in their training that makes certain cops feel lethally threatened, or is more psychological screening needed to weed out the rigid, wrathful types, or is it that profiling frames some men as both menacing and disposable, or that untreated mental illness, which affects both cops and civilians, is endemic and contributes to fatal miscommunication? Or is it some hideous fucking depressing tangle of all this and more besides that makes you want to quit Earth?
Jesus.
I want to clarify: I don't hate cops. But straight up, they do frighten me; though I'm able to recognise that they don't pose much danger to a 5'2" 107 lb. white middle-class woman, I didn't grow up middle-class. I saw cops be a whole lot different to the men I knew, my broke-ass family and neighbours. Sometimes they deserved it, often not. I do think cops choose to solve civilian defiance with violence too often. I know this has to happen sometimes and appreciate that they'll show up prepared to crush if some rapist breaks my basement window. But from what I've seen cops do on the whole default to violence too quickly, and even faster if you're not white, if you're poor; if you're male; if you're a big male. I think the reasons for this are many, and little to do with "cops are evil." To some extent it's "adverse reactions," as you say, to an often traumatic and badly-paid job, I'm sure-- but then again, the vets I know go out of their way to avoid ugliness and conflict, and they've experienced heinous shit too (and are paid garbage) so how are they processing their trauma? I dunno.There are bad cops just like there are bad (insert profession). Most departments have rigorous vetting processes, which include psychological testing and polygraph, to weed out the bad apples. Even so some get through. The profession is an incredibly dangerous one. Being in danger for prolonged periods of time can cause adverse reactions in behavior. I'm not making excuses for bad behavior, but when you see the worst society has to offer (men raping women, people beating infants to death, drunk driving fatalities) it tends to color ones perspective.
This should be illegal.Police don't have to see a weapon to use deadly force.
No clue. If they flashed a gun in a threatening manner, and that's IF, threatening with a gun is assault with a deadly weapon.a 911 caller who said three men had "flashed" a gun. And Cruz saw them "making a scene" on their way to the 7-Eleven near 2100 S. State Street.
Confronted by officers, the two men with Taylor held up their hands, while Taylor alone was "noncompliant."
So someone "claims" they saw someone "flash a gun". #1, open carry in Utah is not only legal, but it's one of the most encouraged states to do so.
#2, if someone did have a gun, what law were they breaking?
#3, if a law was being broken, did it justify this type of heightened threat?
Come on guys, do a LITTLE bit of research to find the facts yourself and make judgement. I would like to know what laws were "reported" being broken. We know at this point ZERO laws were "actually" broken, but what was the reported broken law-anyone?