This may be true but that doesn't mean Comey was close to a good FBI director.Funny thing about that is Trumpaloompa fired Comey thinking this would go away.
This may be true but that doesn't mean Comey was close to a good FBI director.Funny thing about that is Trumpaloompa fired Comey thinking this would go away.
Comey is not the one conducting this investigation. Mueller is.Comey
I was already thinking... you mentioned former FBI director, so...Comey is not the one conducting this investigation. Mueller is.
Mueller was FBI Director before Comey, which makes him a former FBI director.I was already thinking... you mentioned former FBI director, so...
I offer my sincerest apologies.Mueller was FBI Director before Comey, which makes him a former FBI director.
Try to pay attention. I know it's hard now that shit is finally starting to hit the fan for the Trump train...
But try.
Hey, one @MC Gusto is enough!All of a sudden, I feel like spamming gifs and memes like a Trumptard...
Holy fuck...Seth Abramson is a law professor and journalist for BBC, Washington Post, CNN. Sorry for how long this is but I think it’s really interesting.
To be fair, we still don't know if pizzagate is a thing or not.It shows a really sad part of human nature to see the same people on board for that bizarre pizza-gate hoax now saying; “what evidence? There is no evidence of collusion. This is a witch hunt.” They are suddenly skeptically minded people despite FBI documented, grand jury approved evidence.
That is the left or right mentality. People who are open to any evidence regarding this case were casting doutb on the Hillary debacle, and vice versa. That is my frustration, people are willing to be loyal to a lie as long as they are part of a team. We should rid ourselves of this mentality as it is used against us.It shows a really sad part of human nature to see the same people on board for that bizarre pizza-gate hoax now saying; “what evidence? There is no evidence of collusion. This is a witch hunt.” They are suddenly skeptically minded people despite FBI documented, grand jury approved evidence.
Citing “a person in the room,” CNN reports that the Putin-Trump meeting idea was “raised by George Papadopoulos as he introduced himself.” Papadopoulos, who Trump name-dropped as one of his foreign policy advisers just days earlier, told the group “that he had connections that could help arrange a meeting between then-candidate Trump and President Putin,” according to details of his guilty plea made public this week. The timeline laid out in the plea agreement indicates Papadopoulos had just returned from Europe, where he had met with a Kremlin-connected professor who took an interest in him because of his role with the Trump campaign.
The Times, citing an interview with a Trump campaign aide who were in the room for that March 2016 meeting, reports that Trump listened as Papadopoulos proposed the meeting with Putin and even asked questions. But then Sessions, “as the campaign’s top national security official, spoke vehemently against the idea, asking others not to discuss it again. Mr. Trump did not challenge him, the former aide said.”
Papadopoulos’s guilty plea, along with the CNN and Times reports, indicates he knew campaign surrogates were in communication with Russian officials. Recall that Sessions denied having such knowledge during his testimony to Congress. The inconsistency between Sessions’s testimony and what we now know about the Trump campaign’s contact with Russia is particularly problematic for the attorney general, given that he was under oath.OK. CNN has just published a story and I'm telling you this about a news story that's just been published. I'm not expecting you to know whether or not it's true or not. But CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week that included information that quote, "Russian operatives claimed to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump." These documents also allegedly say quote, "There was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump's surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government."
Now, again, I'm telling you this as it's coming out, so you know. But if it's true, it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?
"Senator Franken, I’m not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I didn’t have—did not have communications with the Russians, and I’m unable to comment on it"