There is no tool that staves off tyranny.There is a disease of the mind that cannot be changed by policy.
Unless that policy is to criminalize fomentation of social division by media/corporate outlets.
That would be a far better place to start than attempting to prohibit tools staving off tyranny.
People commit tragedies worldwide in the name of justification, and by any means.
Whether it's knives, guns, bombs, acid, vehicles, poison, hammers, machete's or drone strikes.
There is no answer that can legislate free will.
That's simply untrue. There are multiple mechanisms we just aren't trusted with them.There is no tool that staves off tyranny.
No. If you have to rely on a tool to stave off tyranny you are ultimately just acting out another form of tyranny. The mechanisms of deliberation, participation and production are how we have nominal liberty today. These are all technologies, just like weapons, and they have a much higher success rate than weaponry except as a deterrent for the use of other weaponry.That's simply untrue. There are multiple mechanisms we just aren't trusted with them.
I'm not referring to a tool. I'm referring to regulations (specifically governmental) that impede natural progressions of human evolution.No. If you have to rely on a tool to stave off tyranny you are ultimately just acting out another form of tyranny. The mechanisms of deliberation, participation and production are how we have nominal liberty today. These are all technologies, just like weapons, and they have a much higher success rate than weaponry except as a deterrent for the use of other weaponry.
If you're referring to regulations diverting natural progressions, that's their intended purpose. Regulations are also technologies and depending on the political winds and popular opinion, they shift societies in one direction or another. We haven't evolved for millennia in biological terms. All of our changes have been technological. You can say you disagree with particular aspects of the regulatory framework, but you can also migrate to places where the framework is more favorable to you.I'm not referring to a tool. I'm referring to regulations (specifically governmental) that impede natural progressions of human evolution.
and that's where tyranny comes from.If you're referring to regulations diverting natural progressions, that's their intended purpose.
do you find it odd that some of the most tyrannical governments of recent history decided to ban guns before they became their most tyrannical?There is no tool that staves off tyranny.
Do you find it odd that most efforts to arm "rebels" as a means of overthrowing governments have ended in abysmal failure? Syria, Iraq, Nicaragua, Vietnam, Cuba, the list goes on.do you find it odd that some of the most tyrannical governments of recent history decided to ban guns before they became their most tyrannical?
You're actually trying to equate failed proxy wars with the holocaust?Do you find it odd that most efforts to arm "rebels" as a means of overthrowing governments have ended in abysmal failure? Syria, Iraq, Nicaragua, Vietnam, Cuba, the list goes on.
no, do you think the term "rebels'' is synonymous with the common citizens who make up a country?Do you find it odd that most efforts to arm "rebels" as a means of overthrowing governments have ended in abysmal failure? Syria, Iraq, Nicaragua, Vietnam, Cuba, the list goes on.
Yes. Who else do you think they are? If Trumpito declared martial law tomorrow, 40% of the country would cheer him on, 40% would do nothing and 20% would be the "rebels," desperately trying to either get the Mexican cartels to supply them weapons or get free passage to join the Weapon X program in Canada. The gun battle would go poorly and half the rebels would be wearing Hayabusa apparel while whistling Drake songs on their way through the Dakotas.no, do you think the term "rebels'' is interchangeable with the common citizens who make up a country?
and you're basing these numbers on?40% of the country would cheer him on, 40% would do nothing and 20% would be the "rebels,"
so you think that not only would the military follow Trump's hypothetical tyrannical orders, but 40% of citizens would cheer him on?Yes. Who else do you think they are? If Trumpito declared martial law tomorrow, 40% of the country would cheer him on, 40% would do nothing and 20% would be the "rebels," desperately trying to either get the Mexican cartels to supply them weapons or get free passage to join the Weapon X program in Canada. The gun battle would go poorly and half the rebels would be wearing Hayabusa apparel while whistling Drake songs on their way through the Dakotas.
Voting patterns and Poutine sales.and you're basing these numbers on?
so if Trump decided to follow your advice & confiscate private citizens' guns, what % of the military would comply with those orders?Voting patterns and Poutine sales.
Well, historically the government has a group of particularly devout socialists who believe the state is virtuous and will do the heavy lifting.so if Trump decided to follow your advice & confiscate private citizens' guns, what % of the military would comply with those orders?
Firearm database is a big failure though.The Air Force is admitting an error that they didn't report this guy's crimes to the public. He was court-martialed in 2012 for domestic violence and eventually dishonorably discharged from the Air Force. However, his name was never entered into the National Criminal Information Center database which should have kept him from being able to purchase weapons.
But if we are being honest with ourselves, if a guy wants to get his hands on a gun it's pretty easy to do so. The bigger problem here is a branch of our military decided to wipe their hands of this dude.
He beat his wife repeatedly
Pointed a loaded gun at his wife
He cracked his stepson's skull - a toddler. Admitted to doing it on purpose.
The Air Force stripped him of rank and sentenced him to "confinement" for 12 months. After those 12 months, they kicked his ass out - basically releasing him to society.
Shortly after that he was charged with rape. Charges dismissed.
Then he was charged with animal cruelty - he was beating his puppy in the head.
The media is focusing on the firearm database failure, but it certainly looks to me like the writing was on the wall that this dude wasn't right in the head.