That is some Ctard thinkingCDC is 100% a political source, they're not doing science either.
CDC is our God and Fauci is our Jesus
That is some Ctard thinkingCDC is 100% a political source, they're not doing science either.
no, it's simple analysis of the information that was available compared to the misinformation that they spread, and how that misinformation served their political ends. It's not always rank incompetence and "failing up" when you talk gov't agencies.That is some Ctard thinking
CDC is our God and Fauci is our Jesus
it's the basis for her analysis and she took a completely corrupted and biased source, and made no attempt to correct for it.Not everything on those tweets is from Facebook and you know it
FB survey is better than nothing at all...I suspect much of those claims may hold up if a complete study was done including control groups
I consider those tweets food for thought even if the data gathered isn't concrete
I posted "science" because I don't think much of what is touted as covid "science" can be relied upon at this time, it was mostly a troll and you weren't/aren't the fish I am targeting.
I knowno, it's simple analysis of the information that was available compared to the misinformation that they spread, and how that misinformation served their political ends. It's not always rank incompetence and "failing up" when you talk gov't agencies.
"PhDropout @rockefelleruniv. Accused and admitted "open the schools zealot". Wife, mother of 3. Conservative because liberal. "it's the basis for her analysis and she took a completely corrupted and biased source, and made no attempt to correct for it.
she has no intellectual integrity and no place in scientific research.
"We did not consider the use of respirators in the community. Respirators are tight-fitting masks that can protect the wearer from fine particles and should provide better protection against influenza virus exposures when properly worn because of higher filtration efficiency."I know
I was kidding
I share your opinion on that
We got real problems up at the top
I still think this influenza study holds some water
I am all ears if you can point out the flaws in this studyNonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings—Personal Protective and Environmental Measures
Pandemic Influenza—Personal Protective Measureswwwnc.cdc.gov
Spam some mask studies on virus transferal from before 2020That data is daft. The science is settled; masks work. I could spam a load of links in here, which would scientifically carry more weight, but this YouTube vid is more entertaining and visual:
View: https://youtu.be/x6cTDGqcUpA
agree, but she's tired of masks because she's been lied to about masks."PhDropout @rockefelleruniv. Accused and admitted "open the schools zealot". Wife, mother of 3. Conservative because liberal. "
That ^^^ was the first thing I read and I didn't take here seriously after that, even though I agree with her about restrictions.
She is just a Jaded Mom of 3 tired of Masks.
So everybody should be wearing fit tested 95s or 100s?"We did not consider the use of respirators in the community. Respirators are tight-fitting masks that can protect the wearer from fine particles and should provide better protection against influenza virus exposures when properly worn because of higher filtration efficiency."
\
N95s don't have to be SCBA to work.So everybody should be wearing fit tested 95s or 100s?
we both know that is extremely unrealistic
Right onagree, but she's tired of masks because she's been lied to about masks.
YaN95s don't have to be SCBA to work.
The issue was not that masks don't work, the issue is that we didn't have enough of the masks that work best.
you're repeating the lies of Fauci if you think that touching your face with a mask on increases the odds of getting sick.Ya
A lot of people can't/won't wear a 95
So enforcing that would have been unrealistic
The loose masks are pretty ridiculous and most people just end up touching their faces 20x more than they normally would, which isn't good for spreading....lotta dirty ass masks all around us and those are probably full of all types of shit
So ya the lies at the beginning fucked it all up
IMO effective masking was never gonna happen for all those reasons
So touching your face with dirty hands doesn't spread what you hand touched?you're repeating the lies of Fauci if you think that touching your face with a mask on increases the odds of getting sick.
that's pure bullshit.
I'd say almost everyone CAN wear an N95, and those that can't will do just fine with a surgical or other face covering.
no, because your face doesn't have any ACE2 receptors.So touching your face with dirty hands doesn't spread what you hand touched?
People don't wear them over their nose mostly here so 95 means nothing.
I thought covid was heat seeking?no, because your face doesn't have any ACE2 receptors.
That's rudeit just makes your face dirty, but girls don't want to kiss you anyway.
Why? That's not necessary.Spam some mask studies on virus transferal from before 2020
I would love to read them
Thanks for posting those @LeighWhy? That's not necessary.
Face masks help control transmission of COVID-19
In their paper on self-reported face mask wearing and control of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission in the US, Rader and colleagues1 showed an elegant ecological analysis of data from across the US, estimating the effect of face mask use on the transmission...www.thelancet.com
Oxford COVID-19 study: face masks and coverings work – act now | University of Oxford
Cloth face coverings, even homemade masks made of the correct material, are effective in reducing the spread of COVID-19 - for the wearer and those around them - according to a new study from Oxford’s Leverhulme Centre for Demographic Science.www.ox.ac.uk
Face Coverings and Respiratory Tract Droplet Dispersion
Respiratory droplets are the primary transmission route for SARS-CoV-2. Evidence suggests that virus transmission can be reduced by face coverings, but robust evidence for how mask usage might affect safe distancing parameters is lacking. Accordingly, we investigate the effectiveness of surgical...www.medrxiv.org
You probably won't understand this but here you go.
Thanks TODYou probably won't understand this but here you go.
Face Mask Use and Control of Respiratory Virus Transmission in Households
Face Masks and Respiratory Virus Transmissionwwwnc.cdc.gov
That's a fucking hilarious abstract to read. Honestly sums up the mask debate very well.You probably won't understand this but here you go.
Face Mask Use and Control of Respiratory Virus Transmission in Households
Face Masks and Respiratory Virus Transmissionwwwnc.cdc.gov
Are you aware?Question for those still trying to involve themselves in the masking debate. Are y'all aware that we now have a years worth of data from a test group of billions, or nah?