i think I know what you meant to say, but please say it.Children and teens death rate is 99.99%
i think I know what you meant to say, but please say it.Children and teens death rate is 99.99%
Teens and Childreni think I know what you meant to say, but please say it.
Those diseases disproportionately have negative impacts on kids.Right, but they do for a Polio, MMR, and Hep B. Why is requiring this any different than those?
Lol @ new studies.You display the dunning kruger more than anybody here
You refuse to read new studies and science in an attempt to hold on to what you think you know and a narrative you want to be true
That is ignorance my friend
Derp your face off budLol @ new studies.
D
E
R
P
When you're right, you're right.Derp your face off bud
Fine by me
Real science is evolves
Real science stands up to scrutiny and discussion
You are only interested in Politicized MSM "science" on this topic
There is a lot more information to digest than what you choose to expose yourself to
At this point, I believe we are at over half the world population receiving at least one dose, with a small percentage of side effects. As far as “long term side effects” what would you imagine we see?It is different in many ways.
Completely different scientifically
No long term safety study
Completely politicized
For a virus that has a 99.8% survival rate...or higher for the general population
This "vaxx" is far less effective and unproven than those
bi yearly Boosters will be necessary to keep fully vaxed status
Makers have almost zero liability
Children and teens death rate is 99.99%
Gavin Newsome is a hypocrite
It is a Trump Vaccine
Etc...
Yes
You said that they have a death rate of 99.9%. That’s absolutely wrong. I believe you meant to say they have a survival rate 99.9%Teens and Children
They really aren't at risk from Covid
Natural Immunity would serve them much better and last for decades or longer
Thank you babe, for allowing me to amend my statement
The trump part was a joke about how political it was from the startAt this point, I believe we are at over half the world population receiving at least one dose, with a small percentage of side effects. As far as “long term side effects” what would you imagine we see?
What is a good length, in your opinion, for a long term safety study?
MMR also have remarkable survival rates, yet they still require a vaccination for that.
When you say that the vaccine is “far less effective” what do you mean? The MMR vaccine has an efficacy of ~95%. The Pfizer vaccine is also ~95% effective.
Regardless if it is a “Trump Vaccine”, we had basically an unlimited amount of money and man power going into the development of it. We also weren’t starting this completely blind. We have been researching these types of vaccines for a few decades, and have been researching SARS since the first outbreak in the early 2000’s. This is why they were able to get something so effective in a short period of time.
I understand wanting to be able to choose whether or not you get the vaccine, because it really SHOULD be a personal choice. However, we already require vaccines to go to public schools. Covid does have a great survival rate, but how many people have died at this point worldwide? It’s an insane amount. And who are usually the people that infect vulnerable people? It’s usually the kids. I taught kids jiu jitsu for 6 and a half years. I got sick every single year multiple times, because the little bastards are the perfect spreaders. The severity of my sickness always varied, but it was guaranteed I would be down for at least 1 solid week every year during the beginning of the school year.
As I say the following please bear in mind that I am vaccinated, and with something far more experimental than anything you folks got, so I'm not anti-vax by any stretch of the imagination. That being said, according to Pfizer they don't even know the longterm effects of the vaccine. That's why it went from "2 doses and we're all done with covid." to "Put your masks back on, looks like it's at least 3." If the manufacturer doesn't know whether or not their vaccine is effective beyond 6 months, it's kind of hard to rationalize that they could possibly know with certainty that we aren't all going to grow massive 4 inch penises either.What is a good length, in your opinion, for a long term safety study?
Pfizer is 95% effective against death. It's a sliding scale beyond that. The vaccine also apparently needs to be reapplied every 6 months or it goes out the window entirely. Again, this is according to Pfizer, not some YouTube nonsense.The Pfizer vaccine is also ~95% effective.
YesYou said that they have a death rate of 99.9%. That’s absolutely wrong. I believe you meant to say they have a survival rate 99.9%
1. An insane number, not amount.I understand wanting to be able to choose whether or not you get the vaccine, because it really SHOULD be a personal choice. However, we already require vaccines to go to public schools. Covid does have a great survival rate, but how many people have died at this point worldwide? It’s an insane amount.
Can't verbalize his own thoughts, wants to be taken seriously.
I agree that this has been politicized which I find particularly disturbing. However, that doesn’t take away from what is actually happening.The trump part was a joke about how political it was from the start
I would like the same safety study length that other vaccines are held to...especially for those with almost no risk(which is almost everybody)
95% was an early claim and you weren't supposed to be able to contract or spread the virus, that goalpost has moved 20 times since that early claim and the early claim has proven to be BS...almost every claim about the vaccine has fallen apart in time, yet here we are
Personal Choice is everything, if we don't stick up for that then what are we left with?
The little bastards are building their immune systems, that is the reason Humans have existed for so damn long(Millions of years)...we have amazing immune systems that learn from exposure(previous sars exposed human have proven to have antibodies that fight this version of Sars)
I'm not trying to debate you or change your mind...I just was pointing out some differences between this "vaccine"(isn't a vaccine it is a therapy) and other vaccines
I think it is completely unnecessary to mass vaccinate the population, especially the youth...I come to that by reading the science and Data that is available currently, that is my opinion and I am not trying to force it on anybody
It has always been about preventing an overburdened hospital system by reducing the spread of infection and one's chances of becoming overburdened.
What is an amount? I always thought it was a quantity. A quantity of people, perhaps?1. An insane number, not amount.
2. The survival rate argument by anti-vaxxers, anti-maskers, and anti-any sort of restrictive measures crowd has been a diversion from the beginning. Death was never the primary concern. It has always been about preventing an overburdened hospital system by reducing the spread of infection and one's chances of becoming infected. Vaccines, mask mandates, and other covid restrictions have been shown to be successful at doing those two things, thereby reducing or limiting the number (not amount ) of people requiring hospitalization.
It hasn't "been politicized", it IS political, period.I agree that this has been politicized which I find particularly disturbing
Question away my friendI agree that this has been politicized which I find particularly disturbing. However, that doesn’t take away from what is actually happening.
How long was the polio vaccine studied for before being given to the public?
The goal posts haven’t been moved with the ~95% efficacy. What percentage of people who are vaccinated are getting so sick that they have to go to the hospital? How many are dying? Being vaccinated against MMR doesn’t mean you won’t ever contract one of those diseases. The same goes with Covid.
The little bastards are indeed improving their immune systems.But they are the vectors that pass it onto their parents and grandparents.
Im also not trying to debate you or change your opinion, but I believe that some of your questions needed to be questioned.
Come on, babe. Other scientists besides Fauci have been worried about pandemics for a long time.It hasn't "been politicized", it IS political, period.
From 2017 when Fauci forecast it.
Crime against humanity is a better description.
Amount and number have the same meaning. The word that follows them decides which one you should use.What is an amount? I always thought it was a quantity. A quantity of people, perhaps?