View: https://twitter.com/mermaidsirenviv/status/1558614196216123392?s=20
They got Newsome'd
Grandkids: "What were you thinking?"
View: https://twitter.com/AlbertBourla/status/1559145992594784256?s=20
He should be fine.
He's got 4 injections and Paxlovid, thank god.
Pfizer’s CEO has tested positive for COVID-19, he announced on Aug. 15.
“I would like to let you know that I have tested positive for #COVID19,” CEO Albert Bourla wrote on Twitter.
Bourla 60, says he has received four doses of his company’s COVID-19 vaccine.
“I would like to let you know that I have tested positive for #COVID19,” CEO Albert Bourla wrote on Twitter.
Bourla 60, says he has received four doses of his company’s COVID-19 vaccine.
Healthcare workers subjected to vaccine mandate will get $10M in legal settlement
A group of nearly 500 healthcare workers is slated to receive a $10 million payout in a first-of-its-kind settlement challenging their hospital's COVID-19 vaccine mandate.
The coalition of workers at NorthShore University HealthSystem in Illinois filed their suit in October 2021, alleging the healthcare facility was illegally refusing to grant religious exemptions to the mandate. The July 29 settlement agreement by the state's Northern District Court means 473 current and former healthcare workers are soon to receive compensation for being denied religious exemptions from the healthcare system's vaccine requirement.
Liberty Counsel, the legal group representing 13 plaintiffs, said the settlement should "serve as a strong warning to employers across the nation that they cannot refuse to accommodate those with sincere religious objections to forced vaccination mandates,” according to a statement from Horatio Mihet, vice president of legal affairs at the group.
Healthcare workers subjected to vaccine mandate will get $10M in legal settlement (washingtonexaminer.com)
A group of nearly 500 healthcare workers is slated to receive a $10 million payout in a first-of-its-kind settlement challenging their hospital's COVID-19 vaccine mandate.
The coalition of workers at NorthShore University HealthSystem in Illinois filed their suit in October 2021, alleging the healthcare facility was illegally refusing to grant religious exemptions to the mandate. The July 29 settlement agreement by the state's Northern District Court means 473 current and former healthcare workers are soon to receive compensation for being denied religious exemptions from the healthcare system's vaccine requirement.
Liberty Counsel, the legal group representing 13 plaintiffs, said the settlement should "serve as a strong warning to employers across the nation that they cannot refuse to accommodate those with sincere religious objections to forced vaccination mandates,” according to a statement from Horatio Mihet, vice president of legal affairs at the group.
Healthcare workers subjected to vaccine mandate will get $10M in legal settlement (washingtonexaminer.com)
10 million lousy bucks for five hundred workers subjected to torturous stress.
What's that, like a year's salary for Pfizer's 20th in command?
Meanwhile our government passes a bill to hire 87,000 stormtroopers to raze villages for taxes.
They should all be shot in the head.
What a moron.
Wonder if @Splinty is still fine with giving pregnant women the shot
View: https://twitter.com/thewillwitt/status/1559672065329958917?s=21&t=9F5IkjE1D-bnG-1IzC-6qw
View: https://twitter.com/thewillwitt/status/1559672065329958917?s=21&t=9F5IkjE1D-bnG-1IzC-6qw
i'd like to see the data on this but holy shit if true and they hid it
Canadian Judge rules kids can't be forced to take COVID-19 vaccines
A judge has ruled a 12-year-old girl who is uninterested in taking a COVID-19 vaccine cannot be compelled to take a jab, following a decision in an Ontario family court.
“I do not want my COVID-19 vaccine,” the young girl, described as an A-student, said in an email to the court detailing her decision. The girl explained how “people who have received both shots and the booster are still getting COVID,” and that “she heard from friends that their doctors are advising that children not get vaccinated.”
The court heard how the girl's mother “is not against the COVID-19 vaccine but is not prepared to force her daughter to be vaccinated against her will,” Blacklock's Reporter reported.
The girl's father filed a motion attempting to have the girl vaccinated ahead of the upcoming school year, suggesting that the vaccine is “keeping everyone in our community safe.”
“I do not want the vaccine. I hope my wishes will be respected,” the girl said, saying that this was her “final decision.”
In his ruling siding with the mother and daughter, Justice Christopher Corkery wrote that “the science relating to COVID-19 is developing,” adding that “the ‘facts’ are changing.”
“What are the health implications if children receive the current vaccine but skip some or all of the boosters?” the judge wondered. “What future COVID variant will boosters guard against?”
These questions, Corkery said, “are all questions requiring answers which are currently unavailable. “It is improper for the Court to pre-determine future medical treatments at unknown times, in unknown circumstances.”
Continuing in his explanation, the Ontario Superior Court justice raised more questions. “Does safe mean there are no side effects? Is the vaccine effective in protecting her from contracting COVID-19, from spreading it, from dying from it, from severity of symptoms?”
Justice Corkery outlined how “As with informed consent there are many factors that must be carefully considered in weighing risks and benefits.”
A forced inoculation for COVID-19 would, in the justice's words, “would not respect her physical, emotional and psychological safety, security and well-being but would in fact put her at risk of serious emotional and psychological harm.”
The ‘facts’ are changing: Judge rules kids can't be forced to take COVID-19 vaccines - Rebel News
A judge has ruled a 12-year-old girl who is uninterested in taking a COVID-19 vaccine cannot be compelled to take a jab, following a decision in an Ontario family court.
“I do not want my COVID-19 vaccine,” the young girl, described as an A-student, said in an email to the court detailing her decision. The girl explained how “people who have received both shots and the booster are still getting COVID,” and that “she heard from friends that their doctors are advising that children not get vaccinated.”
The court heard how the girl's mother “is not against the COVID-19 vaccine but is not prepared to force her daughter to be vaccinated against her will,” Blacklock's Reporter reported.
The girl's father filed a motion attempting to have the girl vaccinated ahead of the upcoming school year, suggesting that the vaccine is “keeping everyone in our community safe.”
“I do not want the vaccine. I hope my wishes will be respected,” the girl said, saying that this was her “final decision.”
In his ruling siding with the mother and daughter, Justice Christopher Corkery wrote that “the science relating to COVID-19 is developing,” adding that “the ‘facts’ are changing.”
“What are the health implications if children receive the current vaccine but skip some or all of the boosters?” the judge wondered. “What future COVID variant will boosters guard against?”
These questions, Corkery said, “are all questions requiring answers which are currently unavailable. “It is improper for the Court to pre-determine future medical treatments at unknown times, in unknown circumstances.”
Continuing in his explanation, the Ontario Superior Court justice raised more questions. “Does safe mean there are no side effects? Is the vaccine effective in protecting her from contracting COVID-19, from spreading it, from dying from it, from severity of symptoms?”
Justice Corkery outlined how “As with informed consent there are many factors that must be carefully considered in weighing risks and benefits.”
A forced inoculation for COVID-19 would, in the justice's words, “would not respect her physical, emotional and psychological safety, security and well-being but would in fact put her at risk of serious emotional and psychological harm.”
The ‘facts’ are changing: Judge rules kids can't be forced to take COVID-19 vaccines - Rebel News
No way this is factual.
I don't think they would have been able to keep that quiet.
Seems like a crazy percentage and criminal if true.
Time to change the definition of "kids".