That’s sort of not how “research” works. Many of these papers are not meant to have the laymen read and interpret. You research a tiny element of something so that others can research another element of something else to add to the previous papers research. Or they’ll take what one group of researches started and refine it down. One group of 5 researchers aren’t going to discover every little bit of detail of everything they’re studying. It just doesn’t work that way.There is some really incompetent, and worse, research being bandied around by some prominent academics. I think academia is going to need to drink some bleach and apply some tremendous sunlight once this is all over to get rid of some of the disease in the system. It's not going to happen, but there should be consequences for some of the stuff that has been put out there.
Cunts need to start realizing that if your research is coming up with findings that seems to contradict everything we are seeing around us, your first thought shouldn't be 'what a delightful counter-intuitive finding, I must be a genius and the rest of the world must be wrong', it should be 'hmm, perhaps my research design is completely fucked, I better check it again'. Too many are trying to play the role of brilliant contrarians and are instead playing the role of dangerous imbeciles.
What we need is non researchers (specifically the media) to not take a small finding of a study and twist it around to make folks believe that the results are directly related to the causes in the study. It’s just not that simple unfortunately.