General Electile Dysfunction: an election that lasts longer than 4 days is a serious medical problem

  • Thread starter Deleted member 1
  • Start date
Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up
D

Deleted member 1

Guest
Oh my. The Q subreddit is full of these...

1604930529341.png


1604930588783.png

1604930610423.png

1604930635796.png

1604930659714.png

This isn't even funny. It's just sad.
 

Hauler

Been fallin so long it's like gravitys gone
Feb 3, 2016
49,617
61,677
I'm sure Trump will handle the timeliness of Pfizer's vaccine announcement well.

Purely coincidental that they announced it the 1st Monday after Biden "secured" the votes.

:eyeroll:

It's all political man. These people don't give a flying fuck about their constituents. It's all about power and $$$.
 
D

Deleted member 1

Guest
I'm sure Trump will handle the timeliness of Pfizer's vaccine announcement well.

Purely coincidental that they announced it the 1st Monday after Biden "secured" the votes.

:eyeroll:

It's all political man. These people don't give a flying fuck about their constituents. It's all about power and $$$.
Pfizer would have somehow done worse announcing the vaccine last week and pushing Trump to a win?

Biden is now the pro business candidate?
 
D

Deleted member 1

Guest
Pfizer would have somehow done worse announcing the vaccine last week and pushing Trump to a win?
Maybe announcing right before the election would be seen as a rush by the populace? People would be suspect and not willing to take it?
 

ThatOneDude

Commander in @Chief, Dick Army
First 100
Jan 14, 2015
35,368
34,142
Pfizer would have somehow done worse announcing the vaccine last week and pushing Trump to a win?

Biden is now the pro business candidate?
More goal posts moving. First it was rona would go away after the election, that hasn't happened so we need more excuses.
 
M

member 3289

Guest
I'm sure Trump will handle the timeliness of Pfizer's vaccine announcement well.

Purely coincidental that they announced it the 1st Monday after Biden "secured" the votes.

:eyeroll:

It's all political man. These people don't give a flying fuck about their constituents. It's all about power and $$$.
 

Hauler

Been fallin so long it's like gravitys gone
Feb 3, 2016
49,617
61,677
Pfizer would have somehow done worse announcing the vaccine last week and pushing Trump to a win?

Biden is now the pro business candidate?
I've long stated that Covid has been politicized. And it was a leading voting concern for most Americans.

If you take the worry of Covid off the table, suddenly it's more about getting the economy back on track. If you don't think that favors Trump I don't know what to tell you.
 
D

Deleted member 1

Guest
I've long stated that Covid has been politicized. And it was a leading voting concern for most Americans.

If you take the worry of Covid off the table, suddenly it's more about getting the economy back on track. If you don't think that favors Trump I don't know what to tell you.
I'm just asking what Pfizer themselves benefits from by potentially tipping the election one way or the other and why they would hold their vaccine announcement until today.

If anything you make a good point that because Corona virus became politicized (significantly thanks to the president himself) there may be some calculation here that Pfizer did not want to release right before the election and view themselves furthermore politicized.

I'm trying to come up with reasons on why they would wait until after the election.
 

Hauler

Been fallin so long it's like gravitys gone
Feb 3, 2016
49,617
61,677
More goal posts moving. First it was rona would go away after the election, that hasn't happened so we need more excuses.
They announced a vaccine.
That IS Rona going away after the election.
 
D

Deleted member 1

Guest
They announced a vaccine.
That IS Rona going away after the election.
have they made preliminary estimates on when they're going to release the vaccine?

Pretty much everybody has spitballs that we will see a vaccine for the earliest highest risk like first responders sometime next spring and probably not see mass vaccine availability until third quarter next year.

Does this change that at all?
 
M

member 3289

Guest
I've long stated that Covid has been politicized. And it was a leading voting concern for most Americans.

If you take the worry of Covid off the table, suddenly it's more about getting the economy back on track. If you don't think that favors Trump I don't know what to tell you.
According to exit polls, it was only the third-most important issue amongst voters. The first? The economy.

I'm not arguing that Trump lost because of his terrible response to the pandemic. I've been saying for about a month that it was why he would lose.

But it didn't have as big of an impact as I'd anticipated.
 

Hauler

Been fallin so long it's like gravitys gone
Feb 3, 2016
49,617
61,677
I'm just asking what Pfizer themselves benefits from by potentially tipping the election one way or the other and why they would hold their vaccine announcement until today.

If anything you make a good point that because Corona virus became politicized (significantly thanks to the president himself) there may be some calculation here that Pfizer did not want to release right before the election and view themselves furthermore politicized.

I'm trying to come up with reasons on why they would wait until after the election.
I don't know. Maybe it is coincidental.

Or maybe Pfizer was urged not to release their findings until after the election.

I don't care one way or the other. Not a Trump honk at all. But the timing of the announcement is hard to ignore.