He should be 35-2, not 30-7. Rashad loss was BS. Sonnen,Wand, Belfort and Hendo were on TRT or banned substances when they fought Bispjng. So those 5 losses aren't legit. Out of the two losses he avenged the loss to Rockhold and would smash Kennedy if they rematchedPossible goat because he beat a guy who beat Fedor (but is really 1-1 with that guy and the Fedor fight was 5 year prior)?
Is this one big troll thread?
Was TRT allowed during some of those fights? I can't remember. Either way the issue I have with that is Mike signed the contract. He made a point of calling out suspected or proven cheats yet agreed to fight (obviously thought he'd beat them) and came up short. He knew full well what he was up against and lost so I can't agree about them not being legit. Then you add the Rashad fight being a split, him being 1-1 with Luke then assume he'd beat Tim who has a win over him....Too much to consider if you compare his resume to a guy like GSP. If he can beat Georges I don't see it helping his case much more. He's smaller, formerly retired and 3+ years away from fighting. Between this and rematching Dan in his retirement fight I just don't get this claim.
Emphasis on the slight, methinks. Like, MONSTROUS AMOUNTS. It's a list of finished warriors.
You're argument is invalid as it is never going to happen
Let's say we fight and I bring a sword. You're like "Fuck this chump with his sword and shit, I'll beat your ass sword or no fuckin sword, bitch!" and I cut you up and wallop you as a result. Are you truly gonna say "I got fairly beat because I fought him knowing he had a sword" or "That little bitch can only beat me with a sword, if the playing field was even - as it should've been - I probably would've whooped him good!"??
I wouldn't call you out for using a sword in fist fights then accept to fight you under those same circumstances, that would be retarded. If for some reason I did accept the fight knowing you have a sword and you diced me up I'd only have myself to blame for biting off more than I can chew.
You're right, bro. I don't think Bisping is the GOAT, but he certainly did alright in his career and imo has been able to keep his game strong for a long time. I mean just look at how quickly guys like Rashad and Machida have regressed and they're a similar age.
I agree with this. Until we can agree on the definition of goat it'll always be a pointless argument. Mikey has lasted for a loooong
I wouldn't.
Name me his best win pre-Rockhold?
Are we talking Bisping vs Rockhold 1 or Bisping vs Rockhold 3?
Then i would say Rockhold is his best win, otherwise i would say Anderson Silva.
BEFORE that win, who was Bisping's best win. Hell, even before his reign as cha,p or against Hendo, Silva etc, what was his best win?
i said he was underrated, i didn't say he was GOAT.
I get what you are saying but what if i said was the Silva that fought Weidman the first time was he in his prime?
Hang on a minute, he had like TWENTY FIVE fights before he won the belt in the UFC. I'm not trying to make him look bad, I'm only asking who people think was his best win prior to the big names.Ok@Combo we can find many ways to make fighters not sound as good as what they are. For example tell me Jacares best win aside from Mousasi?
