Nah. Good motor. I've had the 2.7 and the 5.0. The 3.3 feels underpowered by comparison but reliable so far. The 3.5 I had as a loaner once and it's preposterous how fast it is. I really liked the 2.7.Any issues with it so far?
Nah. Good motor. I've had the 2.7 and the 5.0. The 3.3 feels underpowered by comparison but reliable so far. The 3.5 I had as a loaner once and it's preposterous how fast it is. I really liked the 2.7.Any issues with it so far?
That have the eco boost?Nah. Good motor. I've had the 2.7 and the 5.0. The 3.3 feels underpowered by comparison but reliable so far. The 3.5 I had as a loaner once and it's preposterous how fast it is. I really liked the 2.7.
The 3.3 in a naturally aspirated V6. Likely the most reliable engine available in the F150, just under powered in comparison to the other offerings.That have the eco boost?
No. The 3.3 and 5.0 are naturally aspirated. The 3.3 is not common to find, I guess its mainly selected for fleet vehicles. WHen I found the truck, I had never even heard of it, so I went to digging around and found many posts online about what a durable motor it is.That have the eco boost?
Yeah thats what I have read.The 3.3 in a naturally aspirated V6. Likely the most reliable engine available in the F150, just under powered in comparison to the other offerings.
My cruiser had a 3.0 twin turbo ecoboost, that thing had some get up and boogie to it, fastest I ever had it was 128, was an ass gripping moment the first couple times going 110 plus but it drove like on rails, I started enjoying it. My wife was getting mad at me because I was driving the F-150 the same. I have relaxed on that a bit.No. The 3.3 and 5.0 are naturally aspirated. The 3.3 is not common to find, I guess its mainly selected for fleet vehicles. WHen I found the truck, I had never even heard of it, so I went to digging around and found many posts online about what a durable motor it is.
One big reason no one buys it is, it has barely has more towing capacity over the 2.7 but significantly less power. So a guy is usually just going to get the 2.7 in that case.
When I first got it, yeah, it felt slow, but not dog ass slow or anything, just slower than the 5.0 I came from. I would say the 2.7 was perhaps even a bit quicker than the 5.0. Now that I have owned it for about a year, its fine, I have no issues with its acceleration at all. Plus I am getting 20-22 mpg with it.
The Ford V6’s got a bad reputation for the internal water pumps. Thing is, every rwd based version has a traditional external water pump that takes about an hour & $100 to replace. The internal water pumps on the transverse mounted V6’s take over 10hrs of labor (at a minimum) and hundreds in parts/gaskets to replace.Yeah thats what I have read.
Even with 75k miles on it, there are only two issues with the truck since Ive had it. The felt sound barrier underneath sort of half came off (Ive yet to crawl under it months later and fully remove it, lol, I just never think to do it). Recently I intermittently it wouldnt sense the drivers door was closed and ding at me and keep the dome light on. I removed the housing between the door and the wires there look fine, so its likely something within the harness which is behind the door itself. It hasnt done it now in a few weeks so I have again just left it. If it becomes a constant thing, I might have a mechanic fix it. It was a tedious fuckin pain in the ass dicking around between the door and I think I will spend the money to avoid hulk smashing the fucker.
Yeah, that engine will make you sick when it grenades the bottom end.
I dont even wanna know what a new one costs. It aint in my price range, I can assure you.Yeah, that engine will make you sick when it grenades the bottom end.
Those things are why used 5.7 tundra prices have skyrocketed around me
You likely wouldn't have to worry too much as it won't make it out of warranty. Several haven't made it to their 2nd oil change.I dont even wanna know what a new one costs. It aint in my price range, I can assure you.
The interiors are bad ass