I'm interested in a good counter to this what I feel is a logical argument. I'm one of the rare rather neutral people on this issue.
One argument people have for guns is that guns are needed to protect ourselves from the government. This insinuates you want an even playing field. Fair enough.
However. Just like you can use guns for non lethal purposes, or you can have a whacko use guns to cause massive amounts of damage, one could also use tanks for non lethal purposes, or you can have a whacko use tanks to cause massive amounts of damage. Except, tanks are outlawed. Tanks are outlawed for this very purpose. Government has tank access. The same government you fear and want your AR for could literally blast a cannon through your home obliterating your AR into pieces.
But you would agree tanks should be outlawed as they are.
Why couldn't you cut back on weaponry made capable of causing massive murders such as Vegas, school shootings, etc....?